Why Bush and Blair Are In A Panic
War And Oil
Why We Got Into This Mess And How To Get Out of It
Center for Strategic and International
Studies The Changing
Geopolitics of Energy Part I August 12, 1998 · Oil and gas energy use rises by 75% in BTUs between 1997 and 2020. · Industrialized
world and US become steadily more dependent on · Demand from the industrialized world, however, no longer · Asia will become the dominant consuming region by 2010. · Asias Imports will increase accordingly. · China is actively competing in the "Great Game" for · The
Middle East and the Gulf are projected to dominate · The
growing domestic demand for oil in other developing · Pipeline,
port, and tanker geopolitics will change fundamentally · Iran, Iraq, Libya, and Russia represent "high risk" oil
suppliers
|
What Is The Game Plan?
"A map produced by
Harvard, Unocal and others in the spring of 2002
shows the first stages in the encirlcement of OPEC. Added in August, additional troop deployment indentified by
FTW, show that OPEC is not only surrounded, but about to be devided for peicemeal
consumption"
From the Wilderness Publications, 21 August 2002
Click here to
view map
Why Iraq Is Next
"... Ross Perot, hardly the voice of progressive
politics, made the canny observation in the first presidential debate of 1992 that the Gulf War was fought solely for control of
oil and nothing more."
It's the Oil
Los Angeles Weekly, Cover Feature, September 21 - 27,
2001
"[Before the 1991 war] Saddam Hussein claimed that
Kuwait was part of Iraq. To have and to hold it would put him on the way to achieving
something that the Soviets had yearned for right after the Second War and been denied by
the intervention of the United Nations, which was to be sovereign of the Gulf - and so, as
Churchill foresaw and warned about, soon to be able to conquer Europe without a war by
possessing 60% of the oil Western Europe lived by and so be
able to dictate to countries like Britain, France, Germany, that they should abandon their
precious democratic ways and get themselves governments friendly to Iraq..... two days
after Saddam's invasion the United States had no more idea of going to war with Saddam
than the United Kingdom had of fighting Germany three days before it declared war in
August 1914. What so swiftly transformed the views and policy of the United States and the
onlooking allies-to-be was the recognition, first pressed on President Bush by Mrs
Thatcher and then rather late in the day realised by the King of Saudi Arabia, that once
he held Kuwait there was nothing to stop Saddam from seizing the
Saudi oil fields."
Goldfinger is still alive and well
Alistaire Cooke's Letter From America, BBC Online, 24 June 2002
What the UK thinks about the emerging global energy situation
"Trends in energy
markets have been comparatively benign over the past 1015 years: the UK has been
self-sufficient in energy; commercial decisions have resulted in changes in the fuel mix
that have reduced UK emissions of greenhouse gases; and trends in world markets and
domestic liberalisation have reduced most fuel prices. The future context for energy
policy will be different. The UK will be
increasingly dependent on imported oil and gas...
Increasingly policy towards energy security ...... will be pursued in a global arena, as
part of an international effort.... energy security should be addressed by a variety of
means, including enhanced international activity and continued monitoring.... The UK is
currently one of just two G7 countries which is self-sufficient in energy..... The future for energy policy seems likely to be much less
benign.... issues of energy security are likely to become more important. The UK will become increasingly dependent on imported oil and
gas.... most other G7 countries already rely substantially on imported energy. ... [One
way to maintain security is] to use international
action to address global threats to energy security.
On just about any scenario the UK will become more
dependent on imports both for both its gas and its oil. There is little risk of there being insufficient gas available internationally:
there is plenty, and 70% of the world supplies can be accessed from Europe. But the UK cannot be sanguine about the path that the gas will
take from its source to the European market and the risks it may encounter en route..."
The Energy Review
A Performance and Innovation Unit
Report - UK Cabinet Office - February 2002
"Dwindling domestic supplies and surging demand could
lead to a severe gas shortage within three years, the
Department of Trade and Industry warned British consumers yesterday."
Gas shortage in Britain 'due within three years'
London Times, 26 June
2002
"Brian Wilson, the Energy
Minister, said that Britain will become heavily dependent on imported natural gas .... the
Energy Minister predicted that 70 per cent of Britains
electricity would be generated from gas by 2020 and 90 per
cent of the fuel would need to be imported... Mr Wilsons comments come after rumours
that the Governments White Paper is likely to water down a previous target that
renewable sources of energy account for a fifth of power generation by 2020....
The Energy Minister, who is in Algeria [yet another Islamic country whose internal affairs we will no doubt start meddling with as our energy dependency on it grows, nlpwessex] discussing the possibility of importing liquefied natural gas to
Britain, said that the issue of future gas supply should not be overlooked."
UK 'will depend on imported gas'
London Times,
21 February 2003
"The removal of Saddam
is, in effect, the removal of the last threat to the free flow of oil from the Gulf as a
whole. There is nothing like it anywhere else in the world. It's the big prize."
Gerald Butt, Gulf editor of the Middle East Economic
Survey
London Times, 11 July
2002
Merchants of Death
Britain Promotes 50 Year War For Oil
"The Government is facing a
battle with leading car manufacturers over the car of the future after deciding that
fossil fuels will not be phased out for at least another 50 years. Ministers have rejected
a proposal to convert Britains cars to hydrogen by 2025, and called on manufacturers
to develop more efficient models powered by petrol or diesel. However, several manufacturers, including BMW, have invested hundreds of
millions of pounds in developing emission-free cars that run on hydrogen.... The Carbon Trust, a
government-funded body that promotes low-carbon technology, has advised ministers that to
meet this target they should ensure that hydrogen is widely used to power cars by 2025....
Prototypes of BMWs hydrogen powered 7-series have driven
100,000 miles during development without problems. The engine can run on both hydrogen and
petrol, meaning that cars could be driven before a network of hydrogen filling stations
was established. "
Minister is set for collision on move to hydrogen cars
London Times, 22 April 2002
Oil
and Gas Dependency Means World War, It's Time To Abandon The Hydrocabon Based Global Economy Solar Energy, Agriculture and World Peace - click here Remove The Visionless Oil Men From The White House Hot Cheney's Energy Policy - Did Sept 11 victims die for Enron? - 8 March 2002 Hot "A quarter of Britains electricity needs could be
met by building the worlds largest complex of wind farms in the North Sea off East
Anglia, the former research arm of the Atomic Energy Authority said. AEA Technology
concluded after a study, backed by Britains second biggest electricity company, that
technology had advanced so much and costs had fallen so far that it was now economically
and techically viable to build 40 offshore wind farms by 2020." "[One] reason for the Middle East's excessive economic
power is the assumption that oil must remain the world's dominant energy source for at
least the next 20 or 30 years. But there is nothing inevitable about the dominance of oil.
Car engines that can run on liquified natural gas and fuel cells have already been
developed by several motor manufacturers. Vast amounts of electricity can be generated
from wind, nuclear, solar, biomass and other non-oil sources, all of which have the
additional advantage of eliminating carbon dioxide and the greenhouse effect. Why are
these new technologies not already in use, or at least built into long-term energy
planning, which still rests overwhelmingly on oil? The global energy and motor industries
believe it is in their interests to delay for as long as possible the transition from
oil." "But there are three major obstacles
which must be overcome before we can take oil off the list of key objectives for our
military and foreign policy. These obstacles are the the difficulty of changing official
thinking, the vested interests of the oil companies, and the need for a transition
strategy....Once free of the oil imperative many objectives for reducing the tax burden of
defense spending and enabling a stronger world development policy will be easier....At a
time when many feel all too helpless in the face of unfolding military activity a change
in fundamental strategy is something that we can and should work for....Citizens in a democracy must be actors and not just observers or
victims. " |
Back To
'The Special Relationship'
Armitage and the UK National Security Adviser
click here