Home               

LC

Brent

Other Areas

About LCW 

Contact LCW

Quest Scores

Complaint Tips

LC Dossier

LC Cutbacks

Other Sources 

Links

 Harrow see also Harrow Audit  Harrow and Office of Fair Trading

Correspondence about Byron Hall  4.1.04  Viewable at http://www2.harrow.gov.uk/Published/C00000263/M00002894/AI00021518/CliftonJacksonInfoItem.pdf 

2nd November 2004

Harrow Leisure Centre
Harrow
To the Manager, Harrow Leisure Centre (copied to Harrow Council)

Dear Sir,

First I would like to thank you very much for providing your venue for our community event that was held on the 29th August 04. This is the biggest event of our annual calendar and it attracts members of all ages. The Harrow leisure Centre staffs were very helpful and cooperative during the preparation and on the day of the event. With their support and help the event was very successful. I want to take this opportunity to ask you to forward our thanks to the staff that were on duty for that particular weekend.

1 However, there were several issues that I felt should be brought to your attention. Over the years our organisation has felt that the toilet facilities have seriously deteriorated. Some of the hand driers and toilets are out of order and have not been maintained. We have highlighted this to you in the past and it seems that nothing has been done. The conditions of the lavatory floor have not improved either. The rooms were unclean before we started using the facilities. Also there were no sanitary bags and disposal facilities in any of the ladies toilets.


2 This year the number of tables and chairs provided were insufficient for our guests. We were required to hire many extra tables and chairs from an external company at additional cost. As you may be able to understand this has put a heavy financial strain on our voluntary community organisation.

3. This year the stage was not constructed adequately, There were an insufficient number of platforms 'to start with, Over the last few years more and more of the platforms have remained broken and unusable. We were very disappointed by the general condition of the hall. It was simply not satisfactory and we feel the general standard has deteriorated over the years. We have verbally raised the above issues on previous occasions but have not seen any change, nor have we received any feedback.

We have hired Harrow leisure Centre now for well over ten years and appreciative of the service you have provided so far. However, we felt that it was time some of the issues were highlighted in the hope that you will do something to resolve them. I would welcome any feedback from you.
I hope to hear from you soon.

Yours sincerely

Mrs. Kiran D. Bhanderi
General Secretary
Kutch Madhapar Karyalaya

Reply from Harrow Council dated 17 July 2005

Dear Mrs Bhanderi,

Re: Harrow Leisure

Thank for your recent letter regarding your recent use of Byron Hall at Harrow Leisure Centre.

I can confirm that Leisure Connection the Council's facility operator have agreed to make a substantial investment in the provision of new equipment including tables and chairs for use in the Byron Hall. leisure Connection has placed an order with a supplier and is awaiting delivery.

Leisure Connections (sic) are aware of concerns from hirers regarding the cleaning of the Byron Hall, and the cleaning schedule has been adjusted, and additional resources have been allocated to support cleaning. We are also looking at revitalising some of broken staging platforms by either repairing or
replacing broken platforms to provide more stage space for events. 

Should you require any further information please feel free to contact me on 02084247623.
Yours sincerely

Clifton Jackson
Sports Strategy and Partnership Manager

Harrow User Contract Unfair 

From Harrow Observer, 18 November 2004, page 7 - (reproduced in full)
Campaigners celebrate victory after making a splash over leisure centre’s higher charges
 

ANGRY pensioners who campaigned against high prices caused by Harrow’s new Leisure Card are celebrating a minor victory.  Following discussions between Harrow Council and Leisure Connections, visitors to Harrow Leisure Centre in Christchurch Avenue, Wealdstone, will be asked to pay less for certain services.  

Residents in the borough had complained to the Observer about the higher charges for use of the centre’s swimming pool and other services during the past month, including 71-year-old Maureen Stapleton of Woodbury Avenue, Harrow, who was upset to discover the cost of her weekly aquafit session had gone up by more than £1 from £2.30-~3.45.

The price has now reduced to £2.75 for over­ 50s and no Leisure Card is needed. However, Maureen’s husband Frank Stapleton, 74, is concerned the cost is still too high. He said: “We were paying far less before. The thing is they should have considered us to begin with and not just put the price up. We do have to watch our pennies. There is a lot of discontent and they have lost customers over it. The class is now down to 10 as people just aren’t prepared to turn up.”

Rebecca Douglas, spokeswoman for Leisure Connections, encouraged customers to provide feedback. She said: “As a result of our flexible approach to the management of these leisure facilities, we were able to easily amend the pricing structure.”

Thanks to "Harrower" for bringing the above to my attention. PB

From Harrow Observer, 21 October 2004, page 5 - (reproduced in full)

Leisure card cuts discount for pensioner   by Dhtuti Shah

A DISABLED woman was appalled to discover that she must pay 50 per cent more for exercising in Harrow after the introduction of the new Harrow Leisure Card. Maureen Stapleton, 71, of Woodberry Avenue, was shocked to learn of the rise when she arrived at Harrow Leisure Centre in Christchurch Avenue, Wealdstone, for her weekly aquafit session.
She said: "I went on Thursday and the price had gone up from £2.30 to £3.45 per class.
"Nobody was notified about this increase and most of the people who go to aquafit are pensioners who don't have lots of money to spare."

The council-owned centre is run by Leisure Connection and, before the introduction of the leisure card, pensioners were given a discount on all activities. When the card came into force, the new 20 per cent discount applied only to specific activities. The aquafit classes were not among these. Councillor Navin Shah, deputy leader of Harrow Council, said the council was unaware of the discrepancy, adding, "We are looking into this matter and are confident we can reach a suitable agreement."

The cost of the aquafit sessions was not the only thing worrying Mrs Stapleton. She said: "The centre is advertising discounted leisure for all, but that's not the case. They say I get a big discount, but I'm paying £1 more each time. "We're not getting our money's worth.
"The water is freezing, there is no heating in the changing rooms and the amplifier for the music is extremely old."

Her husband and carer, Frank Stapleton, 74, added: "The Government is encouraging older people like us to exercise, but how are we supposed to afford it?"

Rebecca Douglas of Leisure Connection said a replacement amplifier would soon be installed and the other problems raised had already been addressed.

LC's Comments on Harrow Leisure Card  on 4.10.04  from http://www.sportsmanagement.co.uk/newsdetail.cfm?codeID=9188 

.... The card – which can be used at Harrow Leisure Centre, Bannister Sports Centre and Hatch End Pool – will entitle users to a 10 per cent discount on all facilities. 

Residents over the age of 60 and children who are cared for by social guardians will also receive discounts off the initial price of the card as well as free swimming. Additional discounts are available for the unemployed, people with disabilities and asylum seekers. 

Contract manager for the facilities, Mark Cribb, said the cards have proved a huge success. “When the initial idea of this leisure card was suggested we were more than happy to partner and support the council with this initiative,” he said. 

“We are dedicated to working in partnership with the council to see the whole of Harrow maintaining healthy lifestyles and with more than 150 cards sold in 48 hours we are confident they will be a tremendous success.”  ...  

Makes me wonder what a failure would involve? PB 

From Harrow Council  Overview and Scrutiny Committee 1 July 2004  http://www.harrow.gov.uk/content/council_democracy/democracy_elections/agendas/agenda_minutes_harrow.jsp  

Contract for Management of the Council’s Leisure Facilities

1.1 This report gives details of the progress and the content of the agreement with Leisure
Connection plc for the management of the Council’s Leisure Facilities at Harrow Leisure
Centre, Bannister Sports Centre and Hatch End Swimming Pool...

6.2 The agreement is based on a partnership agreement, with the Council and Leisure
Connection working together. The Council will receive a yearly management fee of
£200,000 (index linked) from Leisure Connection, together with a percentage of any
income above an agreed threshold.

6.3 The agreement has taken a significant time to finalise, for the following reasons:
• this is the first partnership agreement of this type that the officers of Urban
Living and the management of Leisure Connection had been involved in, and
the process was significantly more complex and more time consuming than
either party had anticipated
• the loss of key players on both sides (the Head of Property and Development
at Harrow - Geoff Easton, the Council’s Arts and Leisure Officer – Carole
Stewart, and the Managing Director of Leisure Connection) caused delays at
crucial times through the loss of important skills, knowledge and the
reconsideration of decisions, and also the time taken by replacements to
familiarise themselves with the agreement and objectives.
• reorganisation of the business structure of both Leisure Connection and their
consultant lawyers, together with the prolonged illness of the Harrow lawyer
assigned to the project
• the fire at the Leisure Centre in November 2003 also delayed signature
6.4 The documentation has now been finalised and agreed by both parties and the
partnership agreement is to be signed by the end of June.
Thanks to "Harrower" for alerting me to these minutes. PB

Audit Commission Sport & Leisure Inspection 2002  http://snipurl.com/7rfr 

59 Concern over the standard of cleanliness at Harrow leisure centre has been raised by the public and the Council monitoring team: ‘I can never find out who is responsible for repairs such as the basketball nets – the managers just keep on saying it’s the Council – but nothing happens’ - [user]

82 The contractor has a system of logging complaints and responding to the person who has complained. The client and contractor currently carry out some evaluation of customer feedback, but do not display responses on the public notice board in the centre. Customer feedback is not used strategically to drive service improvements. There has been no progress in trying to establish a centre users’ forum

159 The contractors have in place a system for comments and complaints from the public and these are replied to promptly. Although problem areas are identified, resolving underlying causes is slow particularly when caused by poor maintenance. We found that complaints had not been resolved after several months. The fragmented nature of service provision can result in a lack of direction which does not always serve the needs of the customer.

How many months does it take to get something fixed round here’  [customer comment card] (The report makes clear that much maintenance is the responsibility of Harrow Council.)