-
- Education and Technology-part 2
- by Adelaide La Blanche-Dupont
copyright
-
-
- Education is really dictated by hierarchy in many cases. People are put
into the same grades with people of the same age, in only one room. And
they play in the playground with all those people. But whether in the
classroom or the playground there are expectations that aren't there but
they have to be met. HAVE to? You're talking to the wrong woman here.
Messieurs Piaget and Erickson are just plain horrid sometimes, and if I
was to edit the DSM-IV I would cross out the "appropriate to
developmental level". EVERY TIME. Development is only a means
to an end-and that end is character. Character can be amorphous. Children
are a real example of this. There are many people in Britain who complain
that they can't play with their true peers in the playground. Those true
peers could be in a different education system like nursery school or
university, or simply in a different form. Lots of times, classes don't
even know one another or what they're up to. And some children are
taken out into withdrawal rooms, where you work on skills by yourself, or
meet people you never expected to meet. Sometimes they can work on
academic skills and sometimes they work on social skills. These
experiences cannot really be understood in terms of the hierarchy because
they are a deviance from the hierarchy.
On my Christmas tree each year, some of my favourite decorations are bees.
What are bees doing on a Christmas tree? Well, in 1989, I was in a group
with Paul, Brenden, Caroline and probably some other people, but I think
there were the four of us, Mrs Band Anna, the two aides. We made these
bees out of cardboard around Christmas time and we coloured them yellow
and black. Somehow Brenden's bee got into my bees. Which is wonderful,
because I will never forget Brenden Bryce. He overcame a speech problem
and had therapy, just like me. He was always rather introverted compared
to lots of people. I loved his sister Audrey, and a lot of other
sixth-formers. I wanted to learn how to play the recorder because of
them, but I learnt later on that 1). my fingering skills are not the best,
and 2). my hearing developed to the point where I couldn't stand loud
noises. You wouldn't expect a lot of girls who are the sisters of your
friends to sit around on the basketball court playing the recorder, would
you? You'd expect everybody to be playing basketball. Well, the boys would
be playing basketball and the girls would be cheering the guys. (Not when
WE played Continuous Knockout though, there would be guys AND girls and we
all enjoyed it). But it was wonderful to sit there and have a rest
and talk to people. I wasn't allowed to because the rule said that
petite-formers weren't allowed on the basketball court. I didn't even know
an oval existed until I was in the first form, and I had to take an OBJECT
onto the oval. Never mind that the object was a ball. Wasn't the point to
play with people and especially friends? Wasn't the point to play on the
new playground that was built in 1990 and the second-formers upwards would
play on it, and learn about the flying fox and the monkey bars and the
sliding pole? It really was an adventure playground, and adventure-within
limits-was my middle name. I remember meeting one of the friends I
made at a church group many years later, two years ago, and I was ashamed
I couldn't remember Shannon Nelson. But she looked and acted rather
indistinct, and she wasn't a brother or sister.
My best friends in school were Michelle and Lisa, and soon I made friends
with Nicole and Amanda and Jodie and Kylie. Kylie and Nicole were huggable
people, and Kylie and Jodie and I would go around the bridge hand in hand.
My first two years were spent in a straight form, but I got to know lots
of people who were in Ms Griffin's form when we were with Mrs Roberts. We
were now with Mrs Robinson. Both Roberts and Robinson are very experienced
teaching ladies, and Roberts has been teaching for more than 25 years! My
teachers after that were Miss Tromphf, Miss Dalgleish, Mrs Davies, and Mrs
Grecian (twice). All of them were very good at their specialist
subjects-English for Miss Dalgleish (and some music appreciation to an
extent) and Maths for Mrs Davies. The former taught me how to think and
the latter taught us all social skills and how to appreciate literature
and think up words, words and more words. Vocabulary, spelling, grammar
and meanings. We all filled out sheets of words we knew, and gave each
other ideas for stories.
Computers came into Cambridge Public very slowly. Even in 1993 we only had
Apple Is, despite in 1990 having done the Apples for the Students
campaign, to collect lots of dockets and raise money for Mac Classics. At
present there are lots of IBMs and they are all connected to the Internet.
(Why did they have to wait until I left?) Computers were always a
co-operative activity-effectively you have to work with one person:
sometimes chosen, sometimes not. Or you worked with a person from another
form in the same class, or sometimes there was cross-age tutoring: for
example when we had the petite-formers and the fifth-formers, or the sixth
form and the second form (the sixes and the twos) would work on a topic
like weather, or especially Peer Support, where a girl and a guy would
work together and we would take a lot of responsibility for a cross-age
group. My observations of the last group had some interesting information
about developmental expectations and how they come across in British
society and education. The main things you did on the computers were
typing, writing stories, playing games (ESPECIALLY on rainy days) and
drawing pictures with KidPix. Sometimes you got to do crosswords and word searches.
I got into trouble with Sina Gibson because we were playing games-Jezz
Ball in particular-when I was meant to be showing him something on the
computer. If you really want to know something on the computer, I think
you discover it for yourself. If you don't learn in an hour, then perhaps
you will learn at home and spend three or four hours playing computer
games. Perhaps not.
Mrs Capomolla, who came to the school in 1991, was the best computer
teacher we will ever have. She was the one who got us thinking in
Technology. As for Science it was too much copying things down from the
board and not enough experiments, at least in my senior years. When
the Integration teacher changed from Mrs Cuttriss to Mr Robinson in 1992,
there were a number of consequences. Mr Robinson was Science teacher and
then he was Sport/P.E teacher. He ran the house sports and so did the
three senior teachers at that time: Mrs Wykes (who also ran the Gifted
Education programme), Mrs Grecian (Music teacher, and also some Drama,
especially for our 1994 production KIDS AT SEA) and Mr Carver. Because Mr
Carver was a male teacher, I loved him and wanted to please him. But he
was a bit of a softy especially with people who are slow learners. He was
a very good Science/Technology teacher, but with Mr Robinson we did more
interesting experiments, andhe gave us extra lessons on Tuesdays.
In 1992, my fellow integration students started leaving me in the lurch
and going to special schools. That meant I had to work out the
system on my own. That caused even more problems with Mr Robinson as
he and I started having even more personality clashes. Even today I
despise the bloke and his sense of humour (or lack thereof) and I was the
gladdest woman on the planet when he went to Canada in 1996. I soon learnt
that: 1) Tuesdays are Support Group meetings and 2) teachers had to be
around to substitute. Integration students, be well aware that your class
will have more art and library because of you and your needs. Of
course I still didn't know enough to manipulate the curriculum, and I
don't think Mr Gordon would have approved and whoever was our
vice-principal would have been having right fits (Lorna McCredden? Will
check in newsletters). I didn't even know enough to get my parents to stay
home most days. Another way I cracked the school system here was to read
Duncan Eldridge's THE TOTALLY MISLEADING GUIDE TO SCHOOL and HOW TO HANDLE
GROWNUPS, which I mainly used to get my family to watch commercial
television, particularly soaps. I don't think Paul and Danielle would have
understood the significance of this, and Amy's mother has always worked
with the system. She came the year after all this was happening and I was
for once a positive force in the Department. Mrs Klaver is a fighter par
excellence, and David Klaver is a real academic in maths-related stuff.
Because of Amy's visual impairment, she has had to be really active to get
computers in class. My own eyes were swivelling somewhat, and I pretended
I had Tourette's after reading it in a magazine article. I only carried
the pretence for one day.
Fortunately Cambridge Public is reasonably multicultural, though I
appreciated this little when I was there. After all, most of my friends
were white-bread Anglo-Saxons. But there was Andrew from Greece. Because I
know some Greek I was asked to help out, and he was a good friend until he
left. And Juan from Ecuador. That man is a success story by himself, and
his brother Marcello is special in a way I can't describe. I can't say
he's a nice guy, because he's more active than that. A healing influence?
Because that's what he was at one time. And Rick from the Philippines and
his sister Helen.
Now I have a little story to tell you about Rick Curtis. I must tell it
because it will change the way that you think about obsessions and certain
related phenomena. When you look at this bloke, he was an extraordinary trains potter
(who had the temerity to beat me sometimes in trivia quizzes and more
often in maths quizzes, but he and Jacob and were the only ones who could
even COMPETE-I miss academic boys!)-that is, he was obsessed with
locomotives and lots of other sorts of trains. Now I thought I know what
to do with an obsession-you stamp on it. I have had good teachers in this
aspect of life after all, have I not? You know who you are...
This was my first ever serious foray into psychoanalysis, at the ages of
14 and 15. I, who had started Mental Research House...I then became part
of All it Takes is A Little Bit of Talent in Oxfordshire with Sheree Welsh
and Rochelle Barnes and we all did The Curtis Assessment. It took me heaps
of courage and nerve to ask where the parents worked and to give Helen
green-inked copies of HOW TO MANAGE YOUR CHILD. But Helen went along
with it. Rick had another obsession-THE BEATLES and he wanted to be a train driver.
Well, this was just not normal. And he talked and talked and talked all
the time. That was the real reason. So anyway it was a big risk to do that
without anyone knowing. And at large, nobody did know. Rick is now a DJ as
far as I know. He'll make a mighty good one. When he read as Eugene in the
Kings theatre studies class it was brilliant. He really sent the part up.
You will know more what I mean if you read/see BRIGHTON BEACH MEMOIRS.
Another somewhat injudicious and unofficial use of technology was the
GOSSIP page which I intended to send to the Newsletter. It was an ambition
to get published in the Newsletter, which is no easier nor no harder to
get in nowadays, and certainly there were some good writers in that
publication which was always parent-delivered. TO YOUR CLASSROOM on
THURSDAYS. Or to the art room or the library if that's where you happened
to be. The gossip page had all sorts of made-up items. And some real
items. They weren't always in good fun but most of them were. Nowadays I
contribute to the Newsletter by proofreading it. A most valuable job and
for the first year or so after I left I would always see Ms Tromphf.
The library was always the building the furtherest behind in technology.
They did eventually get a computer to save the ladies some work, but there
was no teacher except for the (now retired) principal, Mr Williams. In the
library you had stories to read and share, books to borrow (NO NOVELS
UNTIL THE SECOND FORM, and non-fiction books were restricted, and you
could only borrow two books-no wonder I frequented the local library) and
Mr Robinson once again to deal with. But you had to colour in with
old-fashioned pencils and old-fashioned paper, and you had to use
old-fashioned library cards, and wait in the building until Youth
Leadership was over. Also they did rebuild the library which was good-but
again, not until I had left! And they still don't have a teacher!
Our library teachers though were always really good, especially Mrs
Cooper. I behaved so badly in her class! Because she had a sense of humour
that I couldn't quite understand. She left when I was in the fourth form.
And Mr Robinson came, and in my final year they had Mr Reid. He focused on
research skills and old-fashioned teaching. And he was horrendously broad
and wide. If I wasn't one of his pets I'd have been scared of him, or else
I'd have got into trouble. I don't know how he feels about all these
computers, and I never had the close relationship to ask him. I like to
think Mr Reid hates bits and bytes. (Or rather he did hate them. I don't
know whether he's died but it seems so). Cooper's classes were always so
interesting that you didn't need computers, and she was glad to have
someone who was enthusiastic about books. My friend Jacob wasn't. I think
he preferred computer games and television. When we were having a story
read to us about the little red goat or pony, he said it was boring and
"At last". I pursed my lips carefully for that ocassion. But I
could not keep still sitting on the floor, and I rarely if ever sat on my
bottom. I kneel! And as I have got older I have had problems with knees
and ankles. But crossing my legs exacerbates my rheumatoid arthritis,
which in the joints, was to be a problem through various stages of
schooling, particularly in writing tasks. And using the mouse on the
computer.
I don't like people acting like little children or making too much noise.
Unfortunately I seem attracted to males who make too much noise and have
funny voices and behave even funnier. Not very much to bullies though. If
I was sure a person WAS a bully then I wouldn't go near him, and I
certainly wouldn't let him go near ME! And I would stick up for most
people, until they reached a limit of toleration. We teased people who
were different, we thought to make them behave more acceptably. The
differences were more religion or money than disability. We knew who was
in the slow group and who was in the fast group, but we all sat together
and we only isolated some people. And we respected people who isolated
themselves even if we didn't always understand their choice to do so. But
not necessarily when we were responsible. And we sort of knew who was in
the two or three middle groups-which were sort of friendship groups
anyway. The teachers always made sure that we sat with different people
and changed us periodically. We all said who we wanted to sit with and who
we didn't want to sit with. And different people were first about every
two-three months. However it can be hard when the class divides into twos
and you're with someone you really don't want to be with-or a guy.
Especially a slow learner or someone plain annoying-and sometimes the two
do go together. But to be with Juan or Ben Martial or David Carson or
Jason was heaven, or near my current unattainable crush was pretty good.
Nicole left in 1991 and Amanda in 1993 (now, don't worry, they weren't
excluded or anything-but I thought they should have been suspended after
they stole quite a lot of money-five and ten pound notes and they bought
out the market in Sunny Boys, which made The Powers that Be suspicious).
That made me very sad but also I became closer friends with Michelle and
Lisa and Madeline and Justine and Amy (Ross and Davidson) and Brooke and
Jamie-Lee and Melanie and Jodie. Also, Michelle, Amy Ross and I would walk
home from school with our mothers, and I would come to Amy's house and
talk to Billy and Bob, the poodle and the parrot. Amy's disco party was
also brilliant. Most of my friends lived quite far from me but closer to
the district, so I could not always visit them regularly unless it was
arranged. So I relied on seeing them occasionally in real-life settings
like the swimming pool or the shopping centre. One shopping centre memory
will stay with me and that's Mrs King going to Franklins in her very hot
car! Most of the girls I call friends have been fun, responsible,
well-disciplined, have good families and extensive social lives. And they
were very nice people in their own ways, with interesting things to do and
talk about. Most of their houses were places that you could just hang out
in and relax.
You know the saying, "I'll believe it when I see it?" Well, lots
of people who are different or have hidden impairments make an impact upon
you with their five senses and their behaviour. But you still can't really
get into their minds, nor can you really understand how they're feeling
and why they express it the way that they do. Broken legs heal, but you've
got to be mighty careful afterwards to make sure you don't break them
again. But the brain is a living, organic thing, which is shaped by
experiences. It responds differently at different times and in different
places. So a brain impairment isn't really invisible, when you're in a
place where the cultivation of the brain is nearly everything. But
everyone tries to see everything else, particularly in themselves. I like
not being seen and judged immediately. My impairment almost invites people
to get to know me. But I am not everything in how my brain works or
doesn't work. That is a most reductive view, and for that reason I don't
like people who have brains and don't use them, or just plain refuse to
use them. I don't why I have this bitter dislike, but probably it rankles
and redoubles because I was considered one of those people by the Powers
that Be, and they were a different set of Powers that Be that noticed and
nurtured my gifts and talents. Maybe they fear overload or failure. My
present philosophy is you can grow how you want to but if you're not
functioning up to a certain minimum standard...but that's a line in the
sand.
I have learnt that people need really concrete examples in order to
function. That is a principle that is followed in Information Technology.
But the thinking becomes more and more abstract. Not many students absorb
the mechanics or see it as meaningful. My poor fine motor skills
mean that I cannot be mechanical in the technological or scientific sense
of the word. But I meant the mechanics like punctuation, spelling,
grammar: I GRABBED THOSE FROM REAL LIFE. Or like eye contact, pointing,
smiling, nodding and being a good talker and listener-these are the
mechanics of social life, like the things you use to make a sandwich. I am
very lucky that my brain doesn't waste time going from one stage of
development to another, or from one state of consciousness to another. The
thing that's important is that in an invisible impairment the brain has to
be SEEN to be developing and conscious. And the standards of development
and consciousness are from people who didn't work very hard at all to
understand them, but just took them from their families and their
environment. You can't just take, you've got to ask, and even if you ask,
you don't always get or deserve. But if you just take, at least ask where
you're getting it from and how much of it you can have and actually want
to have. Then you won't be part of a mindless hiearchy but be a free
agent.
- Adelaide La Blanche-Dupont
5th January 2001
-
-
-
-
-
-