www.btinternet.com/~adrian.larner/dataproc

 ADRIAN LARNER

 DATA PROCESSING PAGE

 Latest News

 

The Home Page

Return to The Home Page

DATA PROCESSING

Various topics in Data Processing (including Computing and Information Systems Teaching, and odd bits of Mathematics and Philosophy)

Papers

Data Processing Papers at this site

Reviews

Reviews of Books for The Computer Journal

 

 

DATA PROCESSING ...

 

This fragment of the Data Processing Page is under development.

See the following:

The Data Processing Papers fragment of this page
 
The Data Processing Book Reviews

 

Copyright © 2001 Adrian Larner. The author, identified as Adrian Larner, asserts all moral rights. Subject to the asserted moral rights, the author grants pro tem unrestricted permission for non-commercial copying of all materials on this site for academic purposes.

The decorative image of a key (cc004239.gif) used on pages in this website was obtained from IMSI's MasterClips/MasterPhotos© Collection, 1895 Francisco Blvd East, San Rafael, CA 94901-5506, USA.

 

 

 

 ADRIAN LARNER

 DATA PROCESSING PAPERS

 Latest News

 

The Home Page

Return to The Home Page

Data Processing

Various topics in Data Processing

PAPERS

Data Processing Papers at this site

Reviews

Reviews of Data Processing Books for The Computer Journal

 

 

DATA PROCESSING PAPERS ...

 

“What’s in a Name?”

 


Download
What’s in a Name?

in rtf format (Word for Windows compatible)

Computer Science, no doubt because of its mathematical roots, is steeped in Platonism: it posits the existence of such abstract objects as sets, classes, and types. Commonly, such an abstract object is introduced as the unique bearer of a common name that, intuitively, designates each of its “members” or “occurrences”. It is argued in this paper that the designation of things by common names can – with philosophical propriety and practical simplicity – be better explained and formalised nominalistically: without resort to extra, abstract objects.

 

Back to Balance – Beyond Buck-Bound Bangs

 

 

Who now remembers “the balanced system”? It was a mainframe, usually blue, whose CPU, I/O channels, DASD, and remote lines were appropriately and somehow evenly loaded. Evenly, but not equally: the CPU might be 80% utilised, the channels only 35%, the lines even less. What made it balanced? It was not CPU-bound, nor channel-bound, nor DASD activator-bound, nor line-bound; it had no bottleneck. Or, at least, all its bottlenecks were the same size. As judged by someone that knew about those things.
 
Are our systems today balanced, with their multiple client and server processors, LANs, and WANs?...

 

Software as Intellectual Property

 

 

Richard Stallman, of the Free Software Foundation, has argued that computer software should not be copyrightable. In this essay it is claimed that Stallman’s views are ill-founded: social justice is not to be achieved by appeals to what is “good for society as a whole”. We must give due weight to the claim of natural justice – that each person has a right to what is theirs. However, when the issue is examined on this basis, we still arrive, tentatively, at the conclusion that software should not be copyrightable. But more investigation is needed.

 

f – The Golden Ratio

 

 

The Golden Ratio is a number, f: it is the ratio of two lengths, say AC and the shorter, co-linear AB, with this property:

AB and BC (i.e. AC - AB) are in the same ratio.

This ratio, f, has long been considered aesthetically pleasing. Its numerical value is easily calculated....