Subject: Malcolm: Making Names

Thanks for clarifying your approach to Malcolm's chances if he resubmits with suitable modifications. I rang him and passed on what you said, and he was grateful too. Understandably, he asked if I could set out the position in writing. I tried to do this in the enclosed letter. Obviously it's crucial that I haven't misrepresented what you said. Can you confirm that this is OK? Then I'll send it off. Thanks. - Henry

Fine, with the deletion marked. - R. (Charkin)

Go to the next item or the previous item in the Evidence (red) file.

Go to Malcolm's Statement of Claim, to the Case History, to the Affidavits: Ivon Asquith (1), Asquith (2), Henry Hardy, William Shaw (solicitor) (1), Sir Roger Elliott (1), Margaret Goodall, to the Witness Statements: Elliott, Hardy, Richard Charkin, Nicola Bion, Goodall, to the courtroom testimony of the Oxford Six, 14/3/1990: Elliott, Goodall, Bion, Asquith, Charkin, Hardy, to the testimony of Andrew Malcolm 13/3/1990, to the Chancery Court Judgment, the Appeal Court Judgment, the Damages assessment, the Settlement agreement.

Return to the Malcolm vs. Oxford I (1984-92) Index or to the Malcolm vs. Oxford II (2001-02) Index or to the SITE INDEX.