I. FOR MALCOLM

Over the course of the litigation, Malcolm filed 13 affidavits, a witness statement on 19th October 1989 and was cross-examined in court on 13th March 1990. In addition, the following five affidavits of expert testimony were filed on his behalf:

II. FOR OXFORD

Note. The posted items are listed chronologically and are linked in chronological order. Numerous additional affidavits filed by Oxford's solicitors are omitted.AF=Affidavit, WS=Witness Statement, Test.=Testimony. Listed but presently unposted items appear in grey.

DAMAGES

When it came to the damages assessment, Oxford piled on the costs (eventually estimated over half a million pounds), employing top London City clockers Clifford Chance and widening the battlefront so that instead of merely Malcolm vs. Oxford University, it looked more like Malcolm vs. Publishing UK, with professionals from 12 of the main conglomerates snapping to attention and casually trashing a book none had ever seen by an author none had ever met. - A. M.

Click to return to the top of this file. Go to the first item in the Witnesses (yellow, blue) files. Go to the Evidence (red, green) file index, or to the first item in the Evidence (red, green) file.

Go/return to the Affidavits: Ivon Asquith (1), Asquith (2), Henry Hardy, William Shaw (solicitor) (1), Sir Roger Elliott (1), Margaret Goodall, to the Witness Statements: Elliott, Hardy, Richard Charkin, Nicola Bion, Goodall, to the courtroom testimony of the Oxford Six, 14/3/1990: Elliott, Goodall, Bion, Asquith, Charkin, Hardy, to the testimony of Andrew Malcolm, 13/3/1990, to the Statement of Claim, to the Chancery Court Judgment, to the Appeal Court Judgment, to the Case History, to the Case papers index, to the LAW LIBRARY, to the CUTTINGS LIBRARY, or to The Remedy + options.

e-mail: akme@btinternet.com