DECISION

 

Meeting 12 June 2001

 

 

Complaint 01/96

 

 

               Complainant: The Jerusalem Centre     - R. Bodle     

          Advertisement: WestpacTrust – "If I was a rich man"

 

 

Complaint: An advertisement for the WestpacTrust was screened on TV 2. To the background music of "If I was a rich man", it depicted a variety of scenes ostensibly portraying people of different nationalities contemplating their savings. For example it depicted a man holding a hammer over his piggy bank, and another stacking his money in piles and a woman trying to retrieve her money jar from the rafters of her home. A voice-over stated, "…How you manage your money day to day is your business. How you save money everyday is ours…".

 

 

 

 

The Complainant said:

 

 

 

 

"Last evening I was watching TV on Channel Two and noticed an advertisement from the Westpac Trust Bank entitled “Free Everyday Banking”.

 

The script scene showed an elderly man counting his well earned cash, stacking each coin in separate piles only to have them collapse over a table with some coins landing on the floor.

 

The Theme Music came from the Opera Show known as “Fiddler On The Roof” and the song entitled "If I was a rich man". This ad is "ANTT-SEMETIC".

 

It is in “Poor Taste” and “extremely offensive” to the Jewish minority of our country as it depicts the Jewish people as ‘money hungry’ which boarders on anti-Semitism, which has proved dangerous in the past. We of the unlearned Gentile majority have little or no understanding. (see your video “The Greatest Hatred” that was screened on TV some months ago).

 

 

In its true sense a Rich Jew” is a person who is ‘satisfied with his lot’, and depicts on his ‘spiritual wealth’, or ‘family contentment’ and this applies to all classes in every day Jewish society. It has never been due to wealth in the monetary sense. Their wealth lies in their biblical knowledge, and not in the monetary sense as it is depicted in the above mentioned advertisement.

 

Please in all fairness, Please remove this very Offensive Advertisement."

 

 

 

 

The Chairman ruled that the following provisions were relevant:

 

 

 

Code of Ethics

 

 

Basic Principle 4

 

 

"All advertisements should be prepared with a due sense of social responsibility to consumers and to society."

 

 

Code for Financial Advertising

 

 

Basic Principle 2

 

 

"Financial advertisements should observe a high standard of social responsibility particularly as consumers often rely on such services for their financial security."

 

 

Code for People in Advertising

 

 

Rule 1

 

 

Advertisements should comply with the laws of New Zealand. Attention is drawn to the Human Rights Act 1993 and the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990.

 

 

 

Rule 2

 

 

"Advertisements should not portray people in a manner which is reasonably likely to cause serious or widespread hostility, contempt, abuse or ridicule."

 

 

 

The advertiser said:

 

 

" We refer to your letter of 14 May 2001 and make the following comments in response to the complaint made by Mr. R H Bodle.

 

In deciding whether the advertisement is in breach of the Advertising Codes of Practice it is important to view the advertisement in its entirety including the way in which the characters are depicted and the use made of background music.

 

The advertisement is a promotion for the WestpacTrust Encore bank account a day to day account designed to help customers manage their money more easily. The advertisement seeks to depict, in a light hearted way, a number of individuals in various situations who either have little or no money and the steps they take in managing their money. To reinforce this impression the advertisement makes use throughout the entire advertisement of the music from the song “If I was a Rich Man” from the popular musical “Fiddler on the Roof’. The tag line for the advertisement is “How you manage your money day to day is your business, how you save money every day is ours”.

 

Mr. Bodle contends that the advertisement’s use of this particular piece of music and specifically in relation to the end-scene of the man counting his money on the table results in the advertisement being anti-Semitic and depicts the Jewish community as ‘money hungry”. We do not believe this is the case nor do we believe viewers would draw the same conclusion.

 

WestpacTrust has a very wide customer base and we seek to reflect this in our advertising. The advertisement is an example of this and shows a diverse range of characters. These characters are engaged in activities which are of a common everyday nature, readily identifiable as such, and accordingly, highly unlikely to bring either individuals or groups into contempt or ridicule from other members of the community. Use of this particular piece of music attempts to evoke viewer's recollection of the music’s title so as to draw a humorous connection with the character’s activities and show the irony that, if the characters were rich, they would not be in this position. The use of the song was for the connection to money only, and at no time was it intended to direct attention to any particular ethnic group.

 

In view of these everyday activities engaged in by the characters we do not believe the advertisement offends generally prevailing community standards nor does it encourage belief in out-dated stereotypes or portray groups or individuals in a negative manner.

 

WestpacTrust is very mindful of its obligations to comply with both statutory regulations and industry codes of practice and, to this end, have in place stringent internal compliance systems to ensure we meet out responsibilities. We regret that Mr. Bodle finds the advertisement in poor taste and extremely offensive to the Jewish community, however we have sought to advertise our Encore account in a humorous and fun way. The advertisement is in no way meant to convey an anti-Semitic message to viewers, nor does it intend to single out any particular ethnic group in relation to who is more likely to take better care of their money.

 

We would ask that the complaint is not upheld."

 

 

 

 

The agency, Saatchi & Saatchi, said:

 

 

 

" I am writing in response to your letter to Kim Wicksteed in regard to the above complaint from Roger H Bodle.

 

The advertising codes of practice specifically mentioned in your letter are:

 

Code for Financial Advertising, Second Basic Principle

The second basic principal states: Financial advertisements should observe a high standard of social responsibility particularly as consumers often rely on such services for their financial security.

 

Code of Ethics, Basic Principle 4

Decency - Advertisements should not contain anything which clearly offends against generally prevailing community standards of decency taking into account the context, medium, audience and product (including services).

 

People Code, Rule 1

Advertising should not portray individuals or groups within society in a manner, which is likely to expose them to violence, hatred, contempt, abuse, denigration or ridicule from other members of the community.

 

People Code, Rule 2

Advertisements should not encourage belief in inaccurate or out-dated stereotypes in regard to the role, character and the behaviour of groups of people in society.

 

I would like to make the following points in relation to the complaints:

 

 

 

 

This commercial was developed with a due sense of responsibility to consumers and society. The script for this commercial also underwent a rigorous legal approval process.

 

The commercial shows how a number of individuals manage their money in somewhat charming or quirky scenarios - a cute piggy bank, money in a jar stuck away in the attic, collecting coins that have slid down the back of the sofa, counting coins in stacks. The talent used in this commercial was selected on the basis of giving a fair representation of the New Zealand population both in terms of age, gender and race. The man specifically mentioned in Mr. Bodles letter (“the elderly man counting his well earned cash’) is in fact of Asian origin. There was absolutely no intention to portray any character in this commercial as a Jew.

 

The commercial was developed to promote WestpacTrust’s Encore product - a transactional account. The commercial sets out to demonstrate how WestpacTrust can help people save money on their day-to-day banking. The music accompanying the commercial, “If I were a Rich man”, was selected on the basis that it reinforced the message we were trying to convey ie that with Encore, you can be better off financially or richer in the monetary sense, as you are saving money everyday.

 

The song “If I were a Rich Man” is from the popular musical ‘Fiddler on the Roof’. The show is based on the short story “Tevye and His daughters” by Sholom Aleichem and deals with issues such as persecution, poverty, and the struggle to hold on to one’s beliefs in the midst of a hostile and chaotic environment. The song, “If I were a Rich Man”, will however be best known by most New Zealanders as the version performed by Rolf Harris.

 

In the context of this communication, the song has no relevant link to Judaism and cannot in anyway be considered as Anti-Semitic.

 

We do not wish to offend anyone. We have developed this commercial in a responsible manner and the treatment cannot in anyway be considered in breach of the principles contained in the Advertising Code of Practice. We consider the grounds for complaint unjustifiable…".

 

 

 

 

TVCAB said on behalf of the media:

 

 

 

"The complainant is concerned that a commercial depicting people saving their money is anti-Semitic because the background music is an instrumental version of a song “If I Were a Rich Man”.

 

 

 

This song is from the well-known musical “Fiddler on the Roof’. The musical’s story is based on the short story by Sholom Aleichem entitled “Teyve and His Daughters”. Set in 1905, Teyve is a poor man who sings the song “If I Was a Rich Man” to illustrate that the future of his daughters would be different if he was more wealthy -they would then be free to marry for love. The song is about a person’s choices sometimes being limited by their finances - surely a universal theme not limited to ethnicity or religion.

 

The complainant’s proposal that the advertisement “depicts the Jewish people as ‘money hungry” is not supported by the advertisement itself. The commercial shows a range of different types of people saving their cash in a variety of ways. We do not believe that any ethnicity or religion has been focused upon or highlighted. Rather, these various people are going to extraordinary lengths to try to save cash and this is depicted in a humorous light.

 

We do not agree with the complainant’s view that any one particular group has been singled out, nor do we think that the use of this piece of popular music - whose sentiment is particularly relevant to the advertiser’s proposition - in any way endorses or encourages anti-Semitism.

 

We do not believe that the commercial has infringed the Advertising Codes of Practice."

 

 

 

 

Deliberation

 

 

 

The Chairman directed the Board to consider this complaint in terms of three Codes. The Code of Ethics, the Code for People in Advertising and the Financial Code. In consultation with the Chairman it was the Board's view that only the People Code was relevant to its determination because the advertisement had failed to reach the relevant thresholds to effect a breach of the requirement of a due sense of social responsibility.

 

Therefore the Board referred to the advertisement, and the People Code, but was of the opinion that rather than being derogatory or denigrating, it simply reflected the advertiser's wide customer base. It ostensibly portrayed individuals of different nationalities illustrating in a hyperbolic manner, how they dealt with their money. The theme of "How you manage your money day to day is your business, how you save money every day is ours" is in effect emulated by the song title "...If I were a rich man…" implying that, if you bank with WestpacTrust using its "day to day" account, you too could save, and be a rich man.

 

 

 

In the Board's view the song had a life of its own analogous with Dickens characters, and in this respect concurred with the TVCAB submission that it was a universal song and not in any way limited to a particular ethnicity or religion.

 

In the Board's view the advertiser had not singled out any group or religion for disparagement and therefore in this respect the advertisement was not deemed to be in breach of the Code.

 

 

 

Accordingly the Board ruled to not uphold the complaint.

 

 

 

 

Decision: Complaint Not Upheld