October 1st 2004
Natasha's Nonsense
October 3rd 2004
Hellfire, Logic and Hocus-Pocus
October 5th 2004
Missiles of Spin
October 7th 2004 The
Devil's Virus
October 9th 2004
Reagan On Bush
October 11th 2004
Pope
Stacks Deck
October 14th 2004
Of
Missiles and Road Maps
October 17th 2004
Bothering
God
October 25th 2004
Uncivil War
October 28th 2004
Clone
Clash
October 29th 2004
Ancient
Dwarves
October 31st 2004
Finding Faith
Through Fear
November 3rd 2004
Bleak
Outlook
November 5th 2004 Biblical Bilge
November 7th 2004
The Men Who
Stare At Goats
November 9th 2004
Vacuous Values
Voters
November 11th 2004
Exit the
Crisco Kid
November 13th 2004
Breast Cancer
Lies
November 16th 2004
Sunken Dreams
November 19th 2004 The
Epistle of Brown Nose Bob
November 23rd 2004 Sacred
Snippets
November 25th 2004
No
Miracle
December 1st 2004 Holy
Spam
December 3rd 2004
Unholy Smoke
December 7th 2004
Vardy's
Vacuity
December 9th 2004
Shoot to Thrill?
December 10th 2004
Bullshit
December 12th 2004 Implausible
Stories
December 14th 2004
Hush My Mouth?
December 16th 2004
Second Front
December 18th 2004
No Still,
Small Voice
December 20th 2004
Sanctified Tat
December 22nd 2004 The
Unexamined Life
December 23rd 2004
Thou
Shalt Not
December 24th 2004
Sikh Censorship
December 25th 2004
Herod the Great
December 27th 2004
Integrated Hogwash
December 28th 2004
Asking Why
December 30th 2004
Antiquities Antics
October 1st 2004
Natasha's Nonsense
- just for a moment imagine that you have a
gift, a paranormal power, and you are confident enough in its genuineness
to charge people money for the information you obtain using this power.
Now along comes a benefactor who says let's devise a test for these
powers, the rules and protocols of which we can both agree to beforehand,
and, if you pass this test, you will be given a $1 million. What would you
do? If you are Natasha Demkina, a 17 year-old Russian girl, like many
before you, you ignore the offer. This girl is currently in the UK on a
publicity tour, sponsored by the Discovery Channel. She first came to 80's
notice back in February of this year when the tabloid end of the British
press became excited at her supposed ability to diagnose medical
conditions using some kind of X-ray sight. It was at this time that James
Randi
offered, via a Granada TV researcher, to
test Natasha for the aforementioned
$1 million. He never received an answer. Now Natasha has been
tested for a TV show,
reports the Guardian, by representatives
of CSICOP,
the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the
Paranormal, and, according to the testers, she has failed. Natasha, who
surely agreed to the test rules beforehand, has now fallen back on one of
the standard psychic's excuses for non-performance under scrutiny. She
says that she was unhappy with the way the test was carried out "The
atmosphere of the testing was unfriendly. The conditions I was looking for
were in some cases dubious. Why is that if I get five out of seven I pass,
but if I get four, I'm a total failure?" What, one wonders, does
she mean by unfriendly? Were the testers actually hostile or does she mean
they were not impressed with her performance? Or was it quite proper
scientific detachment? One of the test devisers,
Professor Richard Wiseman, a psychologist
at the University of Hertfordshire, was also unhappy with one aspect of
the test. Apparently Natasha was sending and receiving text messages
during the procedure, something which had been expressly forbidden. This
casts doubts on even the "successes" that she had. While no one there is
suggesting she cheated, it is a definite possibility. Apart from the
dubious text messaging Wiseman also noted that subjects she "diagnosed"
tended to react in the way that many folk do to readings by mediums - by
remembering the successes and tending to forget the much larger number of
failures. Wiseman told the Guardian "When I saw her
do her usual readings, I couldn't believe the discrepancy between what I
was hearing and how impressed the individuals were. I thought they were
going to walk away saying it was embarrassing, but time and again, they
said it was amazing. Before each reading, I asked the people what was the
main medical problem and Natasha never got one of those right."
Wiseman crops up elsewhere this week
talking about seances to BBC News -
oddly, although the strategies of psychics are discussed, the term
cold-reading is not used. This is a widespread and
comparatively easily learned technique of eliciting information from the
bereaved in order to fine tune the reading given. Those desperate or
grieving are often unaware that this is being done and again, as with
Natasha's diagnoses, they tend to remember the hits and disregard the
misses. Wiseman, in both articles, is careful to be polite and accuses no
one of deception or fraud. 80, on the other hand, thinks that most
mediums, and particularly the TV species, are ghouls making a living from
the bereaved and deserve little more than contempt. As for Natasha, she is
going to have to do a lot better if she is going to convince anyone of her
abilities. Taking a test, failing, then whining that the atmosphere was
unfriendly does nothing to convince this observer. For more on the
techniques employed by mediums see
Psychic Sophistry by Tony Youens. For a believer's description
of how Natasha's powers work this message from the
Graham Hancock message board is hard to
beat "It's just one more "siddhi"--psychic ability.
The human body is not solid--no matter is. Some people are born with these
abilities, others pick them up through growth obtained by meditation. She
is seeing with her eye-center chakra--or more accurately, when one is "at"
the eye-center, one can often see through solid matter, because one is
conscious in a higher reality-an etheric or even astral reality. But like
I said, nothing is solid anyway." Certainly nothing between the
writer's ears.......
Popetown Shutdown
- the BBC has been
cowed - not this time by the bullying
tactics of an unelected official, but by pressure and incessant whining
from the Roman Catholic church. It is common ploy these days for various
Christian groups that when something is not to their liking they start
whingeing
about being persecuted and oppressed. The subject of the RC's ire is an
animated comedy show called
Popetown, which,
according to the Daily Telegraph,
features "...back-stabbing cardinals and an
infantile Pope who bounced around the Vatican on a pogo stick..."
(In 80's view, apart from the pogo stick, it sounds like a documentary.)
The show was commissioned for the digital BBC 3 channel, with the voice of
Ruby Wax as the Pope and that of Jerry Hall as a nun, but has been pulled
under pressure from the RC church. The Bishop of Portsmouth told the BBC "It
was obviously going to be a controversial programme which would have
caused offence, not least among the Catholic community who hold the person
of the Holy Father in the highest regard and affection." Unlike
many outside the Catholic community who consider him a reactionary bigot.
BBC 3's controller, Stuart Murphy, is quoted as saying the comic impact of
Popetown did "not outweigh the potential offence it
will cause". It would have been nice to have viewed a couple of
episodes to see if his assessment was correct. He also said "There
is a fine judgement line in comedy between the scurrilously funny and the
offensive." Here he is dead wrong - to be scurrilously funny means
that you are going to have to offend someone. 80's dictionary
defines scurrilous as meaning "Expressing offensive
reproach". (It is also worth noting that Mark Thompson, the BBC's
director-general is a practising Roman Catholic.) The boss of Channel X,
the independent production company that made the show, Alan Marke, made a
most telling comment on the BBC's craven behavior when he said "But
I understand the world has changed since the series was originally
commissioned and sympathise with the difficult decision the BBC has had to
make." The key phrase here is "the world has
changed". Since the show was commissioned 3 years ago the BBC has
been given an
unwarranted kicking over the Hutton
Report into its reporting of the intelligence that led to the invasion of
Iraq. This has made them overly sensitive to the RC church's whining -
which has
not been confined solely to Popetown.
Also, everyone is frightened of being accused of "religious
hatred", especially in light of Home Secretary Blunkett's
proposed legislation. This is confirmed by a BBC spokesman "The
climate in which it was commissioned is different from what it is now.
There are heightened sensitivities about the depiction of religion."
At a time when the absurdities, cruelties and prejudices inherent in
religion are more obvious than ever, a little ridicule and scurrilous fun
would have helped redress the balance.
October 3rd 2004
Hellfire, Logic and Hocus-Pocus
- there are a couple of items in
the Observer/Guardian that, in 80's view, are well worth a moment of your
time. The first is a
comment piece by David Aaronovitch
entitled "Flaws of faith - As religion insinuates
its way into public life, secularists must unite to fight hellfire with
logic" Taking the BBC Popetown climbdown as his starting point (see
Popetown Shutdown)
Aaronovitch looks at the assault by religionists, ie "people of faith", on
secular society, taking in on the way, the hackneyed calumny that atheists
lack morals and the subordinate role of women imposed by many religions.
The title of the piece shows the difficulty of the task in combatting
faith-based bigotry - how can you "fight hellfire with logic"? Those who
believe in the retribution of a vengeful creator God are unlikely to be
amenable to logic - Aaronovitch is right that the creeping religiosity in
education and government needs fighting, the problem is finding the right
strategy. Britain in particular reflects a weird, and infuriating
imbalance, whereby an increasingly secular society is still told what to
do by unelected religionists in the fields of education, entertainment and
government. If you need examples just look at the Popetown fiasco,
sectarian
"faith" schools, and the Blair
government's infatuation with consulting unrepresentative
"faith groups" on matters far outside
their limited provenance. The second item is Cristina Odone's Diary
piece called "Hocus
Pocus has never enjoyed such high status with the middle classes"
citing the popularity of the nonsensical crap (80's words not Odone's)
that is astrology, the attention given to mediums plying their ghoulish
trade of conning the bereaved, clown Prince Charles' patronage of a palm
reader, and other assorted, irrational, claptrap. Does Odone thinks this
should be fought, as Aaronovitch feels about religion, which is, after
all, merely established and officially sanctioned claptrap? It seems that
although she disapproves, she thinks, probably correctly, that the battle
is not winnable, for she concludes "The mumbo jumbo
will continue unabated, raking in millions for its perpetrators and
delivering a thrill to its believers. After all these years, we truly live
in the age of Aquarius." This may seem somewhat of a defeatist
attitude, but is, in fact, merely realistic. Even if there is no ultimate
victory possible the struggle to hold the line is well worth the effort.
80 took a gloomy look at a world dominated by irrational beliefs (If
This Goes On) - it would not be a place worth living in.
Darfur - Denial or Collusion?
- the United Nations High
Commissioner for Human Rights, Louise Arbour, has said the Sudanese
government are in denial over the
horrendous conditions that over 1 million
displaced people are suffering in Darfur, after a week-long visit to the
area. Referring to the widespread incidence of rape and attacks by
militiamen on the refugees she said "I think the
government as a whole is in denial about the scale and the severity of the
problem." Arbour has called for strengthening both the
international presence in the area and increasing the number of African
Union monitors. She summed up the situation in grave terms "Displaced
people cannot envisage returning home because they do not trust the
government of Sudan to protect them. At best they feel the authorities
respond inadequately to their concerns, and at worst that they are in
collusion with their abusers, including armed groups and militias
generally described as Janjaweed." In 80's view it is collusion not
denial that is delaying a resolution to this crisis. It is obvious that
the government in Khartoum has little interest in improving the lot of
those suffering in Darfur. The immediate application of sanctions, backed
up with the threat of military action, is the only thing they will
understand.
Crown Imperial ?
- whatever the result of the forthcoming US
election, the present incumbent's wife is busy remodelling the famous
Lincoln Bedroom at the White House. It is interesting to read this
description, from the Washington Post, of
the centerpiece of the new decorative scheme, "The
pièce de résistance, both decoratively and symbolically, will be a carved
bed canopy in the shape of a crown. It too has been sent for gilding. When
affixed to the ceiling, the crown will support yards of regal purple satin
over white lace, both trailing to the floor." It is said much can
be revealed by one's taste in furniture and fashions. A crown and regal
purple satin speaks volumes........
October 5th 2004
Missiles of Spin - the US has started deployment of its missile
defense system - not because it has been tested and proved to be
effective, but apparently so that President Bush can claim to have
fulfilled one of his 2000 election pledges. SecDef Rumsfeld has tried to
justify the deployment with his usual bluster, as
quoted in the Washington Post (WP) "Did
we have perfection with our first airplane, our first rifle, our first
ship? I mean, they'd still be testing at Kitty Hawk, for God's sake, if
you wanted perfection." No, perfection was not achieved, but the
comparison is misleading - all these examples had a history of development
well before deployment - no one tried to make the Wright Flyer into a
warplane. Another quote from the WP is rather nearer the mark, from
ex-head of the US Strategic Command, Gen. Eugene Habiger, "A
system is being deployed that doesn't have any credible capability, I
cannot recall any military system being deployed in such a manner."
The WP article goes into detail on the many shortcomings of the system,
and notes that it has cost so far $31 billion but is liable to top out at
over $100 billion - in so far as anyone can tell for "...the
traditional reviews and assessments have been bypassed." 80 is
reminded of an observation by the late, great Richard Feynman, which
describes the current situation very well indeed "For
a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
relations, for Nature cannot be fooled."
Thou Shalt Not Kill
- unless of course your victim is gay."I'm
trying to find the correct name for it ... this utter absolute, asinine,
idiotic stupidity of men marrying men. ... I've never seen a man in my
life I wanted to marry. And I'm gonna be blunt and plain; if one ever
looks at me like that, I'm gonna kill him and tell God he died." So
said Jimmy Swaggart, evangelist and bigot, in a
sermon shown on a Canadian TV show (video
here). There are several observations to make here, beyond
noting Swaggart's rampant homophobia (methinks he doth protest too much).
If he sincerely believes in the deity he is always banging on about, does
he also believe it is OK to try and deceive that deity? Yes. Is he so
stupid to think that he could lie to a being that is supposed to be
omnipresent? Yes. All of this merely confirms that Swaggart, who in the
past has demonstrated a close personal interest in
fallen women, has to be one of the most
hypocritical and offensive of a group notable for these two attributes,
the TV evangelists. He is thoroughly contemptible, but no more so than his
congregation, who met his outrageous remarks with applause. If you can
stomach it, this page from BBC news has a video of Swaggart's nauseating
and tearful
public confession of his "consorting
with a prostitute" in 1988. (Thanks to
morons.org)
Costly Blind Faith
- a short while ago 80 asked the question "Are
those accustomed to putting blind faith in a deity more likely to fall for
the wiles of religious con men?" (see
Faithful Forfeit) The answer at the time
was yes - and it still is - and the con man doesn't even have to be
overtly religious. Another slightly different instance of blind faith
leading to penury has surfaced in the
New York Times (reg rqd). Saint Mary's
College, a small liberal arts school in San Francisco's Bay Area, has been
taken in by a con man who offered the school a donation, initially of $25
million, but subsequently raised to a head-spinning $112 million - an
unheard of amount for such a small establishment. The Christian Brothers
who run the school are apparently so unworldly that they, on the basis of
the promised donation went ahead and built "a $25
million, three-story science center and began plans for several other
buildings and major renovations on campus." Now according to Contra
Costa County district attorney's office the Brothers "unwittingly
became entangled in what appears to have been a real estate fraud that
involved more than 120 investors and about $9 million that has
disappeared." The big question must be, why did they spend money
that they had yet to receive? Another equally large question is how the
hell are they going to find the money now to pay for the science center?
Answering the first question is easy, here is what Dr Giles Miller, a now
retired trustee's board member, had to say "It was
accepted on the basis of faith. Faith is a big thing in religion."
No shit. So, obviously, is gullibility. The college president, Brother
Craig J. Franz, announcing that he would step down in January, made the
understatement of the year "I did make some mistake
at some point along the line". According to the NYT he is now
apparently "waiting for the college's internal
investigation to determine precisely what went wrong." What, he
still doesn't know? Hey Craig, you spent $25 million you didn't have on
the promise of a complete stranger. Is that clear enough for you? As
regards the second question, Nicholas G. Moore, the chairman of the board
of trustees, says the college "has never been in
better shape" financially. 80 presumes that this is a faith-based
observation and does not necessarily bear any relation to reality.
Meanwhile, back in the real world, the donor, a Conrad Colbrandt, claims
that he in turn was conned by "John Banker, an
83-year-old former real estate broker whose license was revoked in 1980
after he pleaded guilty to grand theft and forgery in a real estate case
and was sentenced to five years in prison." Banker has now skipped
to Mexico, along with the proceeds of the real estate fraud. You can bet
he is lighting a candle to St. Duplicitous, patron saint of con artists,
right now.
Sound as a Pound
- as noted in the intro of this page "the
only consistent criterion for inclusion is whether a site catches 80's
somewhat fickle attention..." Which is a cunning ploy that leaves
80 free to feature sites that do not fit the usual categories mentioned
here. 80 wrote a little while back about coincidence, but here is a case
of coincidence's near relative, serendipity. This is defined as "pure
luck in discovering things you were not looking for" - the word
itself derives from an old name for Sri Lanka, Serendib. But enough
preamble. At a party recently 80 serendipitously ran into an old friend,
Jack Pound, described on Jack's own
website
by John Rice (more about
John here) as a "musician,
cabaret entrepreneur, jobbing builder, local man about town, and on
occasion, though hard to credit, a lifeguard..... A highly skilled
guitarist and songwriter, his bluesy, often quirky style is particularly
appreciated by discerning literary audiences.....whilst the rest of us
just enjoy the music". The man and his music are well worth
following up, so check out his
site for
CDs, upcoming gigs and other info. By the way, Jack has, for the second
time, contributed a track to a benefit CD in aid of the Demelza Children's
Hospice which is "the only children's hospice caring
for children living in Kent, South East London and East Sussex." If
you can help Demelza House in any way
click here
to visit their site.
October 7th 2004
The
Devil's Virus
- the founder of the Salvation Army, William Booth,
famously said of the turgid nature of
much church music "Why should the devil have all the
best tunes?" He then most effectively employed profane music for
his own religious purposes. It now seems the Roman Catholic church is
taking the same tack in its
reaction to the Spanish government's
intention to legalise same sex marriage. A church spokesman, Juan Antonio
Martinez Camino, hasn't borrowed a tune from the devil, but from someone
who, in the eyes of most religionists, is practically indistinguishable
from that horned figure - Professor Richard Dawkins. Dawkins, a man with
an excellent turn of phrase, has referred to religion (accurately, in 80's
view) as a "virus
of the mind". Camino knows a good metaphor when he hears one,
even when coined by an atheist, and has referred to Spain's proposed
legislation thus, "It would impose on society a
virus, something false, which will have negative consequences for social
life." This BBC news item talks of the Socialist government's
laudable intention of creating a secular state, which has shaken the Roman
Catholic church, and in a telling paragraph identifies the kind of state
where the church can flourish. "The changes have
distressed and outraged the Church, whose influence on Spaniards has
declined precipitously since the death in 1975 of the dictator General
Francisco Franco. His regime was closely linked to the Church."
Fascism and Roman Catholicism have often been
comfortable bedfellows. Also see
here
Update
- to the above. The Spanish government has
approved a draft law which will legalise
homosexual marriages and gives gay couples the same rights as
heterosexual couples, including the right to adopt children. The Spanish
Bishop's Conference has issued a statement saying "A
married couple, producing and educating their children, contributes in an
irreplaceable way to the growth and stability of society," adding
that a homosexual couple "could never have such
characteristics". Question - who would you rather leave a young
child with, a loving couple, gay or not, or a Roman Catholic
priest? Prime Minister Jose Luis
Rodriguez Zapatero said "I deeply respect the
opinions of the Catholic Church even if they are very critical of the
government. I ask them to show the same respect." He won't get it.
Religionists always whinge on about deserving respect but they fail to
reciprocate. Zapatero is being too reasonable - the church deserves
toleration but not respect - not until it shows some respect of its own
for other's opinions. The bishops have the built-in arrogance of those who
claim to know all the answers. Superstition and dogma, no matter how
longstanding or widespread, have no place in a democratic society.
Quote
- "Society bends over backward to be accommodating to
religious sensibilities but not to other kinds of sensibilities. If I say
something offensive to religious people, I'll be universally censured,
including by many atheists. But if I say something insulting about
Democrats or Republicans or the Green Party, one is allowed to get away
with that. Hiding behind the smoke screen of untouchability is something
religions have been allowed to get away with for too long." Richard
Dawkins. (Thanks to
Positive Atheism)
The
Prince of Peace
- would be so proud to see his minions beating the
crap out of each other. The Guardian headline sums up this undignified
episode "Punch-up
at tomb of Jesus". Greek Orthodox and Franciscan clerics
started belting each other after an imagined slight involving an open
door. Things turned nasty, "There was lots of
hitting going on. Police were hit, monks were hit ... there were people
with bloodied faces." according to one witness. A Franciscan cleric
observed "We are all Christians, and there is
nothing to fight about." He obviously does not know his Christian
history - almost from the start the nascent religion was rent by schisms
and things have continued in that vein ever since. Only within a couple of
decades of Christ's supposed lifetime, Paul is being hauled over the coals
by the "pillars of the church" in Jerusalem, and warning in his epistles
against those who preach "a different Christ". Lest Muslims feel smug
about all this, remember that the Prophet Mohammed was barely cold when
the Sunni/Shiite schism occurred and is still the cause of bloodshed
today. Let's face it, revealed religion
is divisive and its claims to absolute truth have ever been a recipe for
strife.
October 9th 2004
Reagan On Bush, Second Helping
- following on from his
scathing attack on George W Bush in
Esquire magazine, Ron Reagan is back on the offensive in an
interview in the Sunday Herald, in particular accusing the Bush
administration of hijacking his father's reputation for its own agenda. In
80's view, Ron Jr doesn't really have all that much to be proud of in his
father's record, but it is entertaining to read his venomous references to
George Bush, some of which are wonderfully catty. Referring to Bush's
attempts to appear as a Texas rancher, rather than the privileged scion of
an East Coast dynasty, Reagan finds it "amusing,
when you see pictures of him on his ranch with his little chainsaw as if
he actually does any work there". He also returns to the subject of
the President's opposition to stem-cell research, with its promise of
treatments for the Alzheimer's disease that afflicted Reagan's father, and
other distressing illnesses. This seems to be at the heart of Reagan's
anger and dislike of the current administration, as it is so close to home
for him and his mother. Referring to those in favor of banning therapeutic
cloning, who seem to equate the use of embryonic stem-cells with abortion,
he had this to say "I wonder how they would feel if
a child or a loved one developed diabetes or Parkinson’s, and then see
where they lie on the debate. Most people have no difficulty in choosing
between a petri dish and a human being." On the war in Iraq, and
the reasons behind it, he has a question for President Bush "I
would ask him whether he felt that the innocent Iraqis and Afghans who
died under our bombs were going to heaven as he imagines it. I think the
answer to that would be very telling about Mr Bush’s character and his
outlook on the world." Asked if he wanted to be a politician,
Reagan declined, citing the constraints on what he could say - "My
mother probably gets a little nervous if I’m too rough on George Bush – I
mean, she has to speak to these people every once in a while."
Perhaps no longer - since Nancy Reagan's views on stem-cell research have
become public her contacts with the Bush
camp are likely to be even less than "once in a while".
From a Cat's Eyes
- here is
a piece by Yusuf Islam in the Guardian
describing his recent abortive attempt to enter the USA. He makes a
spirited defence against what he considers "religious
profiling" and loudly proclaims his peaceful intentions "I
am a man of peace and denounce all forms of terrorism and injustice; it is
outrageous for the US authorities to suggest otherwise." He
professes himself puzzled as to why the US chose to refuse him admission -
and unless those same authorities are more forthcoming this will likely
remain a mystery. In 80's view one thing needs further clarification from
Yusuf Islam, and that is how he defines the injustice that he denounces -
does this include the Iranian death threats against Salman Rushdie? For
more on this, see
Big In Iran.
October 11th 2004
Pope Stacks Deck
- Karol Wojtyla, otherwise known as the Pope, has
been busy adding to the ranks of the blessed, nominating 5 more dead Roman
Catholics for this posthumous honor, which is the precursor of full-blown
sainthood. Among these worthies is the last Austro-Hungarian Emperor,
called Karl I in this BBC
news item. The thought occurs that if he
was the last emperor, how come he has a number after his name? Just plain
Karl should suffice. Also how blessed is someone who restricted, but did
not stop, the
use of poison gas by his military? A
miracle attributed to him leaves a lot to be desired as well. According to
the Vatican he cured a Brazilian nun of varicose veins. (You just cannot
make this stuff up!) An even more controversial choice for beatification
is the torture-obsessed, anti-semitic, 19th century German nun, Anne
Catherine Emmerich. This strange old girl was the source for the nuttier
touches, not attested to in the canonical gospels, that Mel Gibson put
into his 2 hour snuff movie, The Passion of the Christ. (see
Twisted Sister).
Obviously Wojtyla was not awarding the beatification for her S and M Jesus
fantasies involving scourges and flails and buckets of blood, or for her
grotesque caricatures of Jews, but for her "pious
character and concern for the poor." So that's alright, then. By
the way, Wojtyla is a veritable saint factory, for according to Reuters,
he has beatified "some 1,340 people, more than all
his predecessors combined." Perhaps the old boy is stacking the
deck in his favor for when he gets to heaven, much like he has stacked the
deck of cardinals that will choose his successor. (For more on the deluded
old bat Emmerich, her stigmata and childhood conversations with Jesus, see
this
article. Her book of
visions/hallucinations is available
online. Also see 80's
Saints - Who Needs Them?)
Why
Beatify?
- a further thought on this business of beatification and
sainthood. The whole rigmarole whereby an individual's life is examined
for piety and miracles by mere mortals is surely redundant. If God is
omniscient (and we are
told he is) surely he knows immediately
when someone has qualified to be a saint, he hardly needs the Roman
Catholic church to tell him. It should be the other way round - when a
person qualifies for sainthood God can just tell us - straight from the
deity's mouth as it were. This would avoid the preliminary
pantomime of beatification,
devil's advocates and the rest of the
drawn-out qualification process.
Face Value
- 80 was intrigued by the huge amount of
media comment
on George W Bush's
facial expressions during his recent televised debate
with John Kerry. So unflattering was the impression given, that the
Democrats rushed out a web video which can be viewed
here. 80 does not find the features of
the President easy viewing at the best of times, but obviously the
excerpts featured by the Democrats have been chosen to show Bush in an
unflattering light. The DNC chairman, Terry McAuliffe, claims that the
video clip, entitled "Faces of Frustration",
demonstrated "George Bush had a record of failure to
defend, and he failed to defend it. He refused to take responsibility for
his go it alone rush to war, and tt (sic) times, he was defensive,
annoyed, arrogant, even angry, and showed it." How can we tell
these expressions really revealed Bush's emotions? Paul Ekman, emeritus
professor of psychology at the University of California, San Francisco
offers an instructional CD on his
website which, for $49.95, claims to
train you to analyze facial expressions, even the most fleeting ones, "MicroExpression
Training Tools (METT) and Subtle Expression Training Tools (SETT) provide
self instructional training to improve your ability to recognize facial
expressions of emotion. In under an hour, METT will train you to see very
brief (1/25th of a second) microexpressions of concealed emotion. SETT
teaches you to recognize the subtlest signs of when an emotion is first
beginning in another person." Perhaps a swift course of Ekman's CD
will reveal that the general impression given by Bush's demeanor is
accurate - or not. It would also be interesting to submit Kerry's features
during the debate to the same analysis. For what it's worth, and 80 cannot
claim to be an unbiased observer, Bush looked like an irritated brat being
chewed out by a superior, and suffering the admonishment with a singular
lack of grace. It is likely that the expressions displayed are more than familiar to
Bush Snr - they doubtless preceded Junior's suggestion to settle things
"mano a mano" with his old man when he was bawled out for taking his
underage brother Marvin drinking and driving back in 1972. These days the whole planet
suffers the consequences of his reckless behavior.
Country Blues
- highlights from the Ig Nobel awards in
this article from New Scientist, which
also has the best headline "Invisible gorilla steals
Ig Nobel prize", include the study that found "suicide
rates for whites in US metropolitan areas is higher in cities where more
country music is played on the radio..." Accepting the award, one
of the researchers revealed to the audience that "if
you play country records backwards, your dog and estranged spouse come
home and you get your job back." There was also the study that
showed that herring may communicate by farting (you can listen
here). Larry Dill of Simon Fraser
University observed "It's a kind of bonding thing.
Pre-adolescent boys have been doing this for millennia." The
Coca-Cola Company of Great Britain also featured in the awards in
recognition of the Dasani fiasco, as reported by 80 in
Liquid Asset.
October
14th 2004
Of
Missiles and Road Maps - it is interesting to note all the fuss
about Iran's ex-president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani's
declaration that his nation now has
missiles with a range of 2,000 kilometres (1,240 miles). The fact that
this theocracy is also moving to develop nuclear weapons makes for some
very worrying scenarios. This is not helped when missiles, paraded
Soviet-style through Teheran, are draped with banners bearing phrases such
as "crush America" and "wipe
Israel off the map". In response to suggestions that such showing
off could lead to a pre-emptive strike against his country, Rafsanjani
resorted to bluster, "The United States and the
Zionist regime are our enemies, but given their past experience, the
United States knows that they should not engage themselves in a dangerous
conflict with us." To compare, say, a long distance stealth bombing
mission, to the events that surrounded the Iranian hostage-taking at the
end of Jimmy Carter's presidency, and in particular the abortive US rescue
attempt is, not to put too fine a point on it, unremittingly stupid. Now,
as has been made abundantly obvious elsewhere on this site, 80 is no
admirer of the government of Iran and, consequently, it is difficult to
make the mental leap that is required to see their point of view, but one
item is missing from the reports 80 has seen on the new Iranian Shahab-3
missiles. Israel already possesses
rockets of 4000 km range and has had
nuclear weapons for years. It helps to
remember that any kind of arms race requires at least two participants. On
the subject of Israel it is
now official that Sharon's government has
torn up the road map for a two state solution for Israel and Palestine.
Here is a close aide to Sharon, Dov Weisglass, (wonderfully ironic first
name) on the matter of the withdrawal from Gaza "The
significance of our disengagement plan is the freezing of the peace
process. It supplies the formaldehyde necessary so there is no political
process with Palestinians. When you freeze the process, you prevent the
establishment of a Palestinian state. Effectively, this whole package
called a Palestinian state, with all it entails, has been removed
indefinitely from our agenda." Despite this, Colin Powell, the man
whose reputation for probity went down the tubes after his
Iraq WMD speech at the UN in 2003 , still
"does not doubt Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's
commitment to the road map." The truth is whatever Israel wants,
the current US administration is happy to go along. Is it really any
wonder that Rafsanjani is busy doing a bit of scimitar-rattling? (for more
on the Bush administration and Israel see
Solomon, Arthur and Dubya and for an overview of the whole sorry mess read
It's The Occupation, Stupid by Am Johal.
80 also recommends
Israeli/Palestinian ProCon.org for an
even-handed response to the question, "What are the
just resolutions of the Israeli/Palestinian conflict?")
Star Wars Stars - Joyce Jillson, famous astrologer, has just died,
and this
obituary notice in The Globe and Mail
(reg rqd) reveals the extent of her influence. Her daily astrology column
was syndicated in 200 newspapers, but she had other big clients. It seems
she was "official astrologer for 20th Century Fox
Studios" and was actually consulted on the best days to release
movies. The obit informs us that she "picked the
opening date for 1977's Star Wars — the second-highest grossing movie of
all time." This is a classic "post
hoc propter hoc" fallacious statement, the implication being
that the date she selected had something to do with the film's financial
success, which is nonsense. It is also more than a little insulting to the
director and others who worked on the movie, as though their efforts could
have all been for nought but for Jillson's choice of a propitious release
date. A list of her clients includes the Ford Motor Co., the Los Angeles
Dodgers and the Reagan White House, where it was said Nancy Reagan often
made use of astrologers. Jillson's ex-husband, Joseph Gallagher, had a
couple of interesting things to say. It seems that although Jillson's
birth sign was Capricorn, she regarded herself as a Libra. Does this mean
that for her personal preference overruled astrology? It seems a rather
offhand way to treat the field from which she seems to have made a good
living. Gallagher reveals just what was behind this attitude "She
had a complex and very intellectual approach to astrology." Any
truly intellectual approach to astrology reveals in fairly short order
what irrational hogwash it is - which explains just why Jillson was happy
to disregard her birth sign - it was as meaningless as the rest of this
sadly lucrative pseudoscience.
October 17th 2004
Bothering God - if there is a caring supreme being that sees even
the fall of a sparrow, how come religionists think he can be cajoled into
action by intercessory prayers? If a god is truly concerned with the
health and well-being of his human creations, why would he need to be
prompted into action to save, say, a terminally ill person? Surely, with
an omniscient being this should hardly be necessary. Leaving these issues
aside, there are many people that believe prayer can alter the outcome of
illness. This
article in the New York Times (reg rqd)
revisits the intercessory prayer debate, a debate that continues despite
no convincing evidence whatsoever for the success of this god-bothering.
The writer of the NYT piece, Benedict Carey, starts by referring to a
recent prayer study that has become a
scandal and therefore useless as
evidence, although Carey does not seem fully aware of how discredited it
now is. (see
Without a Prayer). A greater scandal is
that the federal government has spent $2.3 million on prayer research over
the last four years. If something does not work, or works no better than
chance, which is effectively the same thing, throwing money at it will
achieve nothing except the transfer of taxpayer's money into the pockets
of those conducting the research. An interesting quote comes from the Rev.
Raymond J. Lawrence Jr., director of pastoral care at New
York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center. He says "There's
no way to put God to the test, and that's exactly what you're doing when
you design a study to see if God answers your prayers. This whole exercise
cheapens religion, and promotes an infantile theology that God is out
there ready to miraculously defy the laws of nature in answer to a prayer."
When religionists make claims about the real world, as opposed to some
spiritual one, then those claims definitely fall under the scrutiny of
science and can, should, be tested, but not necessarily with public money,
and not repeatedly in the face of null results. When Lawrence refers in
disparaging terms to an "infantile theology that God
is out there ready to miraculously defy the laws of nature in answer to a
prayer." he is describing exactly what many, perhaps most, ordinary
Christians believe. The title of the NYT article is partly a question and
partly a statement - Can Prayers Heal? Critics Say
Studies Go Past Science's Reach. The answer to the first part is,
on current evidence, no. As for the second, as is made clear above, any
claims that faith, or psi or whatever has an effect in the physical world
are testable - but further intercessory prayer studies are, in 80's view,
would be a poor use of time and money. (for more see
this from the North Texas Skeptics and
this
piece by Victor Stenger)
Baffle of the Bulge - Elton John is in the news right now
lambasting "mystical" pop singer Madonna
for cheating on stage, by miming. He accused her of the crime of
lip-synching when singing her songs, but at least it can be said that she
was miming to her own voice and using her own material. Such a misdemeanor
is hardly worth bothering about as the pop world is full of deceptions,
and no one is surprised. It would be very different if what was happening
on the stage affected the lives of people worldwide, and those listening
believed, wrongly, that what was being said was a genuine reflection of
the speaker's thoughts and convictions. Which brings us to the first
presidential debate between George W Bush and John Kerry. It has been
reported that in video footage of that event the President appears to have
a bulge (shown
here) under his jacket - or as this
Guardian article (provided by Salon.com)
puts it "The image shows a large solid object
between Bush's shoulder blades as he leans over the lectern and faces
moderator Jim Lehrer.". There is much speculation about what this
object may be, but prime suspect is a wireless radio link to help Bush
make his "spontaneous" rejoinders to Kerry's points. Dave Lindorff, writer
of the piece, at first suspected some digital manipulation of the image,
but was convinced of the bulge's reality after viewing
footage of the debate. So what was going
on here? A spyware and surveillance expert says that "given
its shape, the bulge could be the inductor portion of a two-way
push-to-talk system." This could be used with a tiny, indetectable,
wireless earphone. There is some evidence that this technology may have
been used by Bush before, at the D-Day ceremony in France "when
a CNN broadcast appeared to pick up - and broadcast to surprised viewers -
the sound of another voice seemingly reading Bush his lines, after which
Bush repeated them." If this form of subterfuge is being employed
it raises at least a couple of issues. Those listening to the debate were
deceived into thinking they were hearing the President voice his own
thoughts instead of "channeling Karl Rove",
as Lindorff eloquently puts it. Such electronic ventriloquism (80 can't
help thinking of
Charlie McCarthy) would surely be a
betrayal of trust and grossly unfair, pitting a lone Kerry against Bush
aided by an invisible team. Puzzlingly, if this was really a wireless
receiver giving Bush covert assistance in the debate with Kerry, how come
the President came out of it so
badly? (If you want to know more about this intriguing story an
enterprising soul has set up the bluntly named
IsBushWired.com site. The matter is also investigated here at
Mediachannel.org, and also at the
Cannonfire blog.) By the way, as is the fashion in the press
for any political scandal to attract a snappy name ending with "gate", in
tribute to the late Richard Nixon, this is already being called
Promptergate.
October 25th 2004
Uncivil
War - a war that should belong to the past is still very much in existence - this war is no war on terror, but a civil war within western democracies. In this depressing piece from the Guardian by Jonathan Freedland, it is characterized as the struggle between
of Faith
against Reason. In the US presidential election religion has become another weapon, with George W Bush holding a strong hand. If he is re-elected, Freedland reckons, and in 80's view correctly, that the USA will be on the way to a theocracy. To claim God is on your side is a wonderful ploy, for then any who doubt you are
actually doubting the divinity. This can be a surefire way to stifle the questioning and debate that
are such basic components of a healthy democracy. A President who admits no mistakes and cannot be questioned without impugning his faith, is a dangerous figure indeed. American citizens may well see, if Bush stays in the White House, the dismantling of the barrier between Church and State. Those people of faiths other than Christian, and those of none, will find themselves increasingly isolated and the idea of an inclusive US little more than a dream. Meanwhile, the European Parliament is riven by the appointment of
Rocco
Buttiglione, right-wing Catholic politician and confidante of the Pope. This bigot is on record as saying that AIDS is a divine punishment and homosexuality is a sin. If these were merely private opinions they would be Buttiglione's own affair, but when expressed by the European Justice, Freedom and Security Commisioner it is deeply worrying. In keeping with his beliefs Buttiglione also would like to relegate women to a subordinate role
"The family exists in order to allow women to have children and to have the protection of a male to take care of
them." This vision of women as subservient baby producers is
repulsive. The Vatican must be enthralled to have such a devotee in a position of power, but the secularists are fighting back at the appointment of this religious throwback.
Naturally the Catholic church, using a common Christian stratagem, has described
this understandable reaction as persecution. Buttiglione himself has tried to
defuse matters. This BBC page quotes him as saying
"The state has no right to stick its nose into these things and nobody can be discriminated against on the basis of sexual orientation... this stands in the Charter of Human Rights, this stands in the Constitution and I have pledged to defend this
constitution." This seems at odds with his stated views elsewhere, but one essential point has to be borne in mind when dealing with some kinds of particularly devout religionists - they have a higher allegiance, they know that they are doing their God's will. Normally lying is considered a sin, and this goes for right-wing Catholics and right-wing born-again presidents, but if that lying is considered to be furthering God's work on earth then it is acceptable. On matters of church/state separation 80 believes that you trust the Buttiglione's and Bush's of this world about as far as you could comfortably spit a large rat. (For
the truth about Buttiglione, his beliefs and his membership of a
fundamentalist Catholic sect, see this
(pdf) from Catholics for Choice)
So Sioux Me - Here's a strange one. The native American Oglala Sioux tribe has decided to
complain about a world famous Parisian nightclub that features striptease. It is not the nudity that bothers Harvey White Woman, but the use of his ancestor's name, Crazy Horse, for the establishment and the acts which
"featured pseudo-Indian feathered headdresses - on mostly naked
dancers." The big question is what took so long for the Oglala Sioux to be offended? The club has been in existence
since 1951 - and no one has complained before. Purely in the interest of harmony, 80 suggests that the club drops the name Crazy Horse and chooses one that keeps the Old West theme and is more relevant to the acts on display. 80 feels that the name White Woman fits the bill nicely.
Electile
Dysfunction - President Bush has made it clear that if open and fair democratic Iraqi elections mean that there would be an Islamic government, he would
accept that
decision. This would seem to represent a change of heart on his earlier position - something that if done by others he would no doubt label a "flip-flop". AP quote him as saying
"I will be disappointed. But democracy is democracy. If that's what the people choose, that's what the people
choose." He is definitely right that selection of government by a majority vote is a good idea, and
something that many people feel that the citizens of the US were denied in 2000. Given the already massive problems with
early voting in Florida it may be
that the real winners in a tied election will be the legal teams assembled by both candidates, who will have plenty of work to do. It is ironic that the country that wants to bring democracy to others, by force if necessary, can be so inept at arranging its own free and fair elections.
Biblical Stooge - here is an
interview with Hershel Shanks, editor of
the
Biblical Archaeology Review,(BAR), in
which he attacks the way the Israeli authorities have handled the
investigations into the so-called James ossuary (see
Box of Hot Air?). This now discredited
artifact (see Faking It),
a stone box for holding bones, dating from around the first century, has
an inscription that includes the names of Jesus, Joseph and James. The
combination of these three names to a Christian is like finding the names
Moe, Larry and Curly for a Stooges fan - only the inscription, or at least
part of it, is not authentic. The whole story of the ossuary and another
bogus artifact, the
Jehoash Tablet, can be found on the BBC
Horizon website. Shanks, apart from
editing the BAR (regular readers will know 80 considers the term
"biblical" archaeology ridiculous) is also an author and one of his works,
in collaboration with Ben Witherington III, is called
The Brother of Jesus: The Dramatic Story & Meaning
of the First Archaeological Link to Jesus & His Family. Its
main subject was the ossuary. This was brought out very swiftly after the
ossuary story broke, but before the doubts about its authenticity were
widely aired. Was it a cash-in? Maybe, but currently Amazon has 180 used
and new copies starting at $0.50. (The reviews are worth a read) It hardly
seems reason enough for Shanks to question the methods and probity of the
Israeli team that debunked the box, and the tablet, and whose
investigations led to the arrest of Oded Golan, the supposed middle-man in
the sale of these artifacts, and the discovery of a forgery workshop at
his premises. You'd think it would be a subject on which Shanks is
unlikely to dwell - but apparently not. He is happy to agree that " Shimon Gibson hyped this
cave thing with John the Baptist. I think
that's probably true, and some people say that I hyped the ossuary too
much, which I think is not true." 80 sees little difference. Shanks
is entitled to his opinions, but as 80 has said before, to look at near and
middle-eastern archaeology and history through biblical blinkers is to be
blinded to the evidence. (see
Missing, One Empire)
October 28th 2004
Clone Clash - the United Nations has been debating a ban on human cloning, on and off, since 2001. Recently, after
two days of of further debate, a decision still has not been reached. In 80's view this long drawn out process will never bring any kind of clear cut resolution because the subject under discussion is not about science but about religion. The UK, Japan, and the many other countries opposing a ban, prefer a more flexible, Belgian, solution. They are clear that they are in no way promoting the idea of reproductive cloning, but wish to develop therapeutic cloning for the possible huge medical benefits of the technology. The other side, backing a complete ban, originally proposed by Costa Rica, seems unable or unwilling to differentiate between the two kinds of cloning. This is not from ignorance of the science involved but because the opposition is based wholly on religious grounds despite any claims to the contrary. The representative from the Philippines objection to even therapeutic cloning, as it
"would have the undesirable result of perfecting the technologies that could be used to clone
babies" and would be "playing with
fire" sounds very similar to the old mad scientist movie dialog "there are some things Man is not meant to know". New Scientist
quotes Gregory Stock, from the University of California in Los Angeles, who accurately assesses the true nature of the debate,
"This is about a religious issue that is not resolvable by logical
discussion." It is particularly hypocritical that those who oppose even therapeutic cloning cite as one reason the concern that any cloning could lead to the exploitation of women. Most of these countries are dominated by religions which already, in 80's view, do not value women as much as men. Therapeutic cloning, as
already pursued by the UK, involves cloning embyos and harvesting stem cells from them. The embryos are then
"destroyed before they are 14 days old and never allowed to develop beyond a cluster of cells the size of a
pinhead." That such a potentially beneficial technology should be universally banned for reasons of religion and superstition is a very worrying prospect. Can these countries in favor of a ban not be able to tell the difference between
"cluster of cells the size of a pinhead" and a suffering human being, for example, the late Christopher Reeve? George Bush's administration, the real power behind the Costa Rican proposal, is desperately trying to force a world ban, for without one, independently minded states within the US, such as
California, will simply pursue their own research, whether the Federal government likes it or not. Of course if the US chooses
John Kerry the whole nature of the debate will change........
Satan's Sailor - the British Royal Navy (RN) is in the news this week for officially recognizing its first serving Satanist. Naval technician Chris Cranmer, claims to have been a follower of Satan for the last 9 years. The
Church of Satan itself was founded in San Francisco and its precepts are, unsurprisingly, based on selfishness and self indulgence. In this
BBC report two individuals, both Christian, are asked to comment on the story. The first is an ex-Tory minister who left the Church of England (CofE) and became a Roman Catholic because of the CofE's ordination of women. She professed to be
"utterly shocked" at the thought of a Satanist in the RN, although a good case could be made that her chosen church causes more pain and suffering in the world today than any mere handful of Satanists. The second is the director of the
Reachout
Trust, an evangelical Christian ministry. This bunch provides information on
"cults, occult, new age and all groups holding to non-biblical
teaching". This seems to include Jehovah's Witnesses and Mormons as well as Satanists. Commenting on Satanism in particular, director Doug Harris told the BBC
"Following such tenets and working them out practically in your life seems to produce a selfish person not a member of a
team." By this he would seem to imply that Cranmer is not suited to serve in the Royal Navy, but this is not necessarily true. If a Satanist is convinced that teamwork,
obviously essential on a warship, is the best strategy for his/her survival, then they would be a perfectly suitable crewmember. Exactly how Cranmer will be treated by his shipmates is an entirely different matter.
Straining for Faith
- here is a
charming little item about the German theologian and constipation sufferer, Martin Luther, from BBC news. It seems the toilet, upon which he sat for hours straining and formulating his ideas on salvation, has been discovered. Archaeologists are excited about the find as usually only grander buildings are preserved. Perhaps it was in this little room that
the great man also composed his vicious diatribe against the Jews, called
"On the Jews and Their Lies". As you may see from
this
translation, the work, much like Luther himself, was full of crap. According to the BBC piece
"Luther left a candid catalogue of his battle with constipation but despite this wealth of information, certain key details remain obscure - such as what the great reformer may have used in place of toilet
paper." In 80's view it is a pity he did not use the pages of On the Jews and Their Lies. Perhaps understandably modern day Lutherans, such as
these, have found a way around the embarrassing fact that their figurehead wrote anti-semitic nonsense - they ignore it.
Bring Them On - in a rare instance of Islamic terrorists doing George W Bush's bidding, there is good evidence that the jihadi's destination of choice is Iraq. In
July 2003 the President made what is perhaps his most fatuous remark ever - which is, in itself, quite an achievement.
"There are some who feel like that the conditions are such that they can attack us there. My answer is bring them
on," Bush said. "We've got the force necessary to deal with the security
situation." This article in the New York Times
(reg rqd) examines the growing evidence for streams of young Muslim men from Europe headed for the turmoil in Iraq. When they are done there, if past evidence is anything to go by, they will return to Europe
and elsewhere to apply the murderous skills they have learned. A French intelligence official told the NYT
"We consider these people dangerous because those who go will come back once their mission is accomplished. Then they can use the knowledge gained there in France, Europe or the United States. It's the same as those who went to Afghanistan or
Chechnya." This certainly seems to answer the question of whether
the invasion of Iraq has made the world a safer place - not one bit.
October 29th 2004
Ancient
Dwarves - many papers are running with
the astounding discovery of a hitherto unguessed member of the human
family. Dubbed "hobbits", these people lived perhaps 18,000 years ago on
the island of Flores in Indonesia. They were barely a meter tall and had,
compared to modern humans, small brains. This did not seem to affect their
dexterity as stone tools have been found associated with the remains. It
is speculated that these folk, properly called Homo floresiensis, were
isolated on the island and evolution selected those of smaller size owing
to scarce resources. This effect has been noted with other island dwelling
species. It is speculated local legends of little people mean that Homo
floresiensis possibly co-existed for a while with Homo sap. Given modern
human's
record, this may explain why they are no
longer around, although at least one scientist, Bert Roberts of the
University of Wollongong, thinks it is possible they may still exist
somewhere in the deep jungle. It is interesting to note the way the
discovery has been reported - the San Francisco Chronicle
refers to h. floresiensis as "proto-humans"
which would seem to indicate the writer considers them to be in some way a
forerunner of modern humans. This reflects the wrong, and yet widespread
belief that evolution leads up to that perfect creature - us. In fact the
tree of life is more like a bush, and we are just one twig among others.
In the UK
Guardian, Tim White of the University of
California, Berkeley, wonders "How will the
creationists cope?" with the news. As their beliefs are divorced
from reality and rooted in myths and fairy tales, 80 confidently predicts
the discovery will have no effect whatsoever. For those, who, like 80,
find the hobbit label insufferably cute just be thankful, for it could
have been worse. None of the newspaper wits have realized the obvious
cultural reference. These folk were dwarfs and the palaeontologists have
found seven of them. Heigh-ho, heigh-ho...............
Outfoxed
- Rupert Murdoch has revealed an unsuspected streak of wry humor.
Speaking at the News Corporation's annual
general meeting in Adelaide, on coverage of the US election race by Fox
News, he said "We don't take any position at all.
We're not in the least bit biased, we're a fair and balanced company."
And pigs are masters of aeronautics............
Cagey
Tactics? - for many people who were
less than pleased with the outcome of the US 2000 presidential election
one state came to represent what they saw as the crooked end of the US
electoral process - Florida. It seems that this dubious distinction
will be retained in 2004 - certainly
according to Greg Palast, reporting on BBC TV's Newsnight program.
(Available
online for 24 hrs from Tuesday October
26th from 22:30 UK and 5:30 EST Click Latest Show) To quote the BBC news
web page " A secret document obtained from inside
Bush campaign headquarters in Florida suggests a plan - possibly in
violation of US law - to disrupt voting in the state's African-American
voting districts." This involves what is referred to as a "caging
list" of "1,886 names and addresses of voters
in predominantly black and traditionally Democrat areas of Jacksonville,
Florida." The only purpose of such a list, it is claimed, is to
challenge voters in order disrupt the process and deter them from casting
their vote. The BBC page says "Republican state
campaign spokeswoman Mindy Tucker Fletcher stated the list was not put
together "in order to create" a challenge list, but refused to say it
would not be used in that manner." What does seem puzzling is why
such a low level clerical matter should be of interest to Bush campaign
bigwigs in Florida and Washington. It is difficult not to see all this as
an attempt to affect the vote in what is shaping up to be a very close
contest, and one that may well end up in the courts. The reputation of the
BBC for impartial and objective reporting will be seen by many as adding
weight to such suspicions of electoral skullduggery. Meanwhile, in Ohio,
Republicans are challenging the eligibility of 25,000 registered voters,
alleging fraud by Democrats. They intend to field more than 3,000
volunteers around the state to check voter's credentials. The UK Guardian
says the Republican's check of voter
registrations turned up "120,000 duplicate names,
and an unknown number of ineligible voters, including a murder victim and
two suspected terrorists." 80 hopes that Iraqi officials are taking
notes on how to run a trouble free election.......
October 31st 2004
Finding
Faith Through Fear - it is Halloween
time again and here is a
story from the Washington Post (WP) about
groups of evangelist and fundamentalist Christians trying to turn this bit
of harmless seasonal silliness to their advantage. The clever scheme is to
outgross the usual "haunted houses" popular with kids by portraying their
own brand of horrors, both real and imagined, in the hopes of scaring
people into faith. Instead of witches, broomsticks, ghosts and pumpkins
they tend to feature such things as a " Hell House,
a morality play featuring a gay man dying of AIDS, a lesbian suicide,
drunken driving and a botched abortion -- and the reeking, fiery hell that
is the consequence of such sins..." This charming bit of
religionist propaganda was formulated by Rev. Keenan Roberts, pastor of
Destiny Church of the Assemblies of God near Denver, according to the WP.
He peddles how-to kits at $299 a pop for those who wish to stage their own
shows, including nice little touches such as "how to
select the best cut of meat to depict an aborted fetus -- and tips for
dealing with skeptical journalists." The idea that people have to
be scared into belief by such graphic depictations of horrors is
repellent, and shows how desperate and scruple-free these religionists
are. If anyone other than Christians mounted such shock displays expressly
to frighten children and the gullible there would be an outcry. It is a
depressing fact that over the last month one such "scare into faith"
exhibit by a group from Jerry Falwell's Liberty University, has attracted
20,000 people. Just how many of these succumbed to the message "....
if they die tonight, where will they go?" is not mentioned.
Enter the
Ghoul - like some grisly Halloween
spectre, the skeleton in the bin Laden family's closet, mass murderer and
religious fanatic, Osama bin Laden has popped up another low-tech video
appearance just a few days before the US elections. If his intention was
to stiffen the resolve of whoever becomes President to hunt him down,
along with his confederates, then the ghoul has likely succeeded. The
heavily bearded apparition also seems to have managed to knock the news of
the horrific death toll of Iraqi civilians off the front pages, (see Price of Freedom below) but then indulging
his own ego may be more important to him. The real message bin Laden
conveyed was the obvious fact that he is still around - which merely
confirms what a misguided and tragic irrelevance the invasion of Iraq was
to the hunt for international terrorists. If resources had not been
diverted by the Bush administration from Afghanistan to Iraq, bin Laden
could well be staring at the four walls of his cell right now and have
only his own trial in prospect, instead of planning further mayhem.
Price of
Freedom - one of the more notorious
quotes from the ongoing campaign in Iraq was that of General Tommy Franks,
in reference to Iraqi civilian casualties, "We don't
do body counts". Now someone else has, and the total is shocking
and almost beyond belief. The website simply called
Iraq Body
Count has been trying to keep track of "civilians
reported killed by military intervention in Iraq" - the maximum
figure shown is 16312 on October 29th. Now a new study of the death toll,
quoted
here in the Guardian, shows this figure
to a huge underestimate. "About 100,000 Iraqi
civilians - half of them women and children - have died in Iraq since the
invasion" So goes the report in the prestigious British medical
journal, The Lancet, by a group of Iraqi and US public health officials,
led by Les Roberts of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
in Baltimore. It goes on to say "The risk of a
violent death is now 58 times higher than it was before the invasion".
This makes President Bush's pronouncements about bringing freedom to the
Iraqi people seem like a very sick joke indeed. The battle for their
"hearts and minds" was lost long ago. 80 fully expects the grisly total of
100,000 dead to be disputed by the US and its coalition partners in a
nitpicking damage limitation exercise. For argument's sake then let's be
drastic and halve that number - 50,000 dead - does it sound any better? (A
summary and the full report (PDF) is
available online at The Lancet after
registration.)
November 3rd 2004
Bleak
Outlook - for the first time the
American people have elected George W Bush as president. It would be nice
to think that the closeness of the final result would be a signal to his
administration to be more inclusive and to practice some "compassionate
conservatism". This is, of course, hopelessly optimistic, for Bush is not
a politician in that sense. It is far more likely that he, and his
cohorts, will take the result as an endorsement of their actions over the
past four years, and will continue to dish out more of the same. Expect
more erosion of the barrier between church and state, more weakening of
environmental pollution regulations, more tax breaks for the rich, and
more alienation of the USA's traditional allies. Regarding President Bush,
80 can do no better than to quote Winston Churchill, "He
has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire"
Announcement - from the Department of
the Bleeding Obvious. The UK's Mars lander, Beagle 2, failed because of
lack of funding from the UK government. Dr Ian Gibson, chairman of the
House of Commons science and technology committee
told the BBC "As a
result, the scientists had to go chasing celebrities for sponsorship when
they might have been testing rockets." This may be a revelation to
some, but it is very old news to anyone with an interest in the UK's
contribution to space research. The amount of money involved was paltry by
government standards, but science apparently takes a backseat to important
projects such as funding schools teaching
creationist drivel.
Curse of
Cassandra - as the end of the year
approaches psychics of various kinds will offer their predictions for the
coming year. From those who write in
trashy tabloids to the ghastly (and
equally trashy)
Sylvia Browne (see her prediction
record here), a frequent guest on
uncritical TV shows, such as
Larry King's, they all have one thing in
common - a conspicuous lack of success (see
New Year's Crystal Balls). Their
predictions are no better than chance guessing - and often not even
that good. Demonstrating that his hit rate leaves these psychic frauds
in the dust is columnist Harley Sorenson, writing for SF Gate. He lists a
series of his predictions that have been
proved to be right on the money. One sample should suffice, about the
invasion of Iraq, which you will recall took place in March 2003. Here is
Sorenson almost a year earlier, in April 2002, when he wrote that the US
was being set up "for a war with Iraq, a war that
will cost thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, of lives ... you and I
will be told that our sons and daughters will be fighting in Iraq because
Saddam has suddenly unlocked the secrets of weapons of mass destruction
and is about to blackmail the world." Accurate or what? Obviously,
unlike the psychic con-artists, Sorenson lays no claim to paranormal
powers, but modestly states "None of my predictions
was rocket science. They all relied simply on public information and a
small dose of common sense." Two things that all of his
prognostications have in common is that they are unremittingly downbeat
and have had no effect on the course of events. It seems that Sorenson for
all his "common sense" is doomed to share the fate of Cassandra,
prophetess of Troy. For offending the god Apollo she was cursed to
foretell events accurately, but never to be believed. (It was she who
warned of the Trojan horse and was ignored by her ill-fated countrymen.)
Sorenson, our modern day Cassandra, does make one final prediction
regarding the winner of the US presidential race, "...I'm
predicting victory for a Yale graduate and "Bonesman" (member of Yale's
secretive and exclusive
Skull and Bones society).
The final margin will be, as it was in 2000, a black-robed 5-4, same five,
same four."
Quote
- "We have been contacted by followers of the Wiccan
religion, and they indicated they have been offended after seeing
elementary school depictions of witches with long noses, warts, cauldrons
and such." So says said Tony Apostle, a school's superintendent in
Puyallup, Washington, who has banned Halloween displays from 31 schools.
It seems it is not just the fundagelicals who are miffed by harmless
Halloween silliness, the Wiccans have now jumped on the idiot bandwagon. A
parent of two kids affected by the decision
told the Washington Post "It
is unusual for Puyallup to make the national news. We made it by being
ridiculous."
November 5th 2004
Biblical Bilge - still with matters archaeological is an item from
SFGate.com on the discovery of the
remains of a ship, near the ancient port of Dorus in Israel. The timbers
have been carbon-dated to the 9th century BCE. This seems enough for
marine archaeologist Kurt Raveh to take wing on a flight of fancy,
unsubstantiated by any evidence whatsoever, a not unusual situation for
those who espouse the non-discipline of "biblical archaeology". He has not
the slightest hesitation in using the radio-carbon date to connect the
ships's remains with the mythical King David and his son Solomon. "I
took a little piece of wood and sent it to laboratories in Switzerland.
This week we got it back, and it turned out to be from the time of David
and Solomon, 3,000 years old." The problem with this assertion is
that there is no evidence, bar one disputed inscription, for David.
Furthermore, Solomon's great empire, described in the bible, is never
mentioned by any of the surrounding civilizations with whom he was
supposed to have traded and exchanged diplomatic missions. The writer of
the SFGate.com piece, Matthew Kalman, seems to swallow these biblical
romances unquestioningly, as does another expert quoted, ancient boat
specialist Yaacov Kahanov of Haifa University, who, referring to Dorus,
says "In King Solomon's time, this was the major
port for the Israelite kingdom." Only once does real world
archaeology impinge upon the story when Kalman states "If
the remains are indeed 3,000 years old, it would be the first
archaeological artifact ever found from the era of the first kings of
Israel, with the possible exception of several huge stones at the base of
the Temple Mount in Jerusalem." The Temple Mount stones are only
attributed to the time of Solomon following an inference from the ancient
writer Josephus. If these stones are discounted Kalman's sentence confirms
that there is no other evidence of a kingdom of David, or an empire of
Solomon, other than the bible tales. Oddly this does not stop him, and the
others quoted, from treating fabulous tales as true history - this is
typical of "biblical archaeology" where real evidence recovered from the
earth is of less consequence than ancient stories. (80's attention was
drawn to both the above stories by David Meadows' excellent weekly
newsletter,
Explorator
See here for the story of the
Solomonic pomegranate that wasn't)
Cell Block - one consequence of the Bush administration's election
victory is that the push, via Costa Rica's proposal to the UN for a
complete worldwide ban on cloning, whether therapeutic or reproductive,
will go on. (see
Clone Clash). Meanwhile in California,
the somewhat more savvy electorate voted in favor of
Proposition 71, which pledges $3 billion
over the next 10 years for stem cell research, via the
California Stem Cell Research and Cures Initiative. This is one
of the areas where Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger finds himself
at odds with the White House, which approaches the subject from a
religious point of view, and is more concerned with the wellbeing of a
dot-sized cluster of cells rather than the search for possible cures for
many crippling diseases. So far the US government has withheld funds for
research on any cell lines other than the 22 derived before August 2001.
Recent research now
indicates that these approved cell lines
may well be useless for medical treatments for human beings. It seems they
were grown on a scaffolding of mouse feeder cells which, it is now
learned, causes the stem cells (properly human embryonic stem cells or
hESC) to take on rodent characteristics. This would mean that they would
provoke an immune response from any human being in which they are
implanted. This pretty well renders research for human applications
pointless on the government approved hESCs - plus a further study suggests
that 5 of the 22 lines were so difficult to grow that they may not be "clinically
useful" anyway, reports New Scientist. The continuing debate in the
UN and elsewhere on cloning is perhaps a pointer to the malign effect a
theocratically-inclined White House will have on many subjects of global
importance - such as the
withdrawal of funding for groups that
help combat the spread of HIV AIDS, but who also commit the heinous crime
of promoting contraception on our massively overcrowded planet. To say
four more years of Bush and co. heralds a new Dark Age is perhaps going
too far, but the clear light of a rational, scientific worldview will need
ceaseless promotion lest it become dimmed further by the forces of
religion and superstition.
Bible
Basher Bitten - 80 was distressed to
read of the
ill-treatment of a lion in Taipei Zoo.
The poor beast was minding its own business, lolling around dozing, as
well-fed carnivores are wont to do, when its siesta was interrupted by a
Christian. A man leaped into the lion's enclosure, shouting "Jesus,
will save you" to the lion, and its companion. He then, somewhat
rashly, called out, "Come, bite me". The lion
obligingly did so, sinking its teeth into the man's leg (and his arm,
according to
this report). Instead of being rewarded
for its obedience, the unfortunate creature was driven off with water jets
and tranquilizer darts. It is suggested that the man was possibly living
out a delusion that he was the biblical character Daniel, who also had a
close encounter of the leonine kind. On a more serious note, it is to be
hoped that both lion and human make a full recovery from this traumatic
experience. If you think that 80 shows little sympathy for the man, you
are right. Too often a pleasant, post-prandial doze has been interrupted
by evangelizing bible-bashers at the door. So far 80 has shown great
restraint and has not bitten any of them, other than verbally.
November 7th 2004
The
Men Who Stare at Goats - a new 3-part documentary series had its
debut on Channel 4 in the UK on Sunday. Called
Crazy Rulers of the World (CRotW) this
first part was dedicated to the various whackos that have succeeded in
extracting money from the US military for their crazy schemes. It is
well-known that the CIA's
Stargate program managed to waste
millions looking into the possibility of
covert surveillance via remote viewing
(RV). The Skeptic's Dictionary
describes RV as "the
alleged psychic ability to perceive places, persons and actions that are
not within the range of the senses." whereby the practitioner can
use " psychic power alone to dowse the entire
galaxy, if need be, for whatever one wants: oil, mountains on Jupiter, a
lost child, a buried body, a hostage site thousands of miles away, inside
the Pentagon or the Kremlin, etc." The only people who benefited
from this waste of time and money were those who still trade on the
supposed cachet of having been involved with the project, the better to
sell their
nonsensical services to the gullible.
Crazy Rulers of the World brings things up to date, detailing the work of
folk like
Major General Albert Stubblebine, ex-head
of the US Army's Intelligence and Security Command, who believes, among
many other things, that you can walk through walls - you only have to
summon up the willpower to do so. He couldn't - and bruised his nose.
Another bunch set up a lab at Fort Bragg in order to learn how to kill
goats by staring at them - hence the title of the first episode of CRotW,
The Men Who Stare at Goats. The big (supposed) scoop of the show is that
these and equally nutty programs have been revived in the service of the
"War On Terror". (Perhaps we are witnessing the dawn of Dubya's
faith-based military, for when reason is discounted in favor of gut
instinct and blind faith by the commander-in-chief, they can but follow.)
80 stoically managed to sit through the first 20 minutes or so, but the
ravings of one ex-military nut job after another soon swamped the bullshit
detectors. Especially the video showing one
Guy Savelli
mentally influencing the behavior of his pet hamsters - or was it the
other way round? (Here is a
discussion of martial artist Savelli,
including mention of his ability to "drop a goat"
using his mind. The correspondent backs up this story by revealing a
little of himself "This might sound funny to some
people, but I don't always believe in pure science.") If you have
the stomach for it, a book of the series, called The Men Who Stare at
Goats by Jon Ronson is available - although you could also read it for
free - by remote viewing.
There's More - since writing the above, 80 has found an article in
USA Today telling of an Air Force report
that calls for $7.5 million to study "psychic
teleportation". Asked why the Air Force Research Lab was sponsoring
the study a spokesman said "If we don't turn over
stones, we don't know if we have missed something." Before these
clods and others start turning over stones why don't they they check with
people who actually know something about testing paranormal claims -
CSICOP
or James Randi
would be a good start - and a damn' sight cheaper. Spookily enough (or
not) Randi's
newsletter this week has a paragraph or
two about a remote viewing outfit,
Psi Tech, who have managed, using their
awesome RV powers, to come up with a totally
erroneous explanation for the crash of
American Airlines Flight 587 in November 2001. Read an accurate report
here in New Scientist. For usefulness and
practicality, remote viewing is definitely in the chocolate fireguard
category.
Babylon Graffiti - here is an interesting piece from
al Jazeera, the news outfit that manages
to be a whipping boy for just about everyone involved in the current
conflicts in the Middle East. (A passing thought - if al Jazeera is
attacked by all sides for perceived partiality then they must be getting
something right. Such a situation is surely also familiar to the BBC) It
seems that American troops are leaving graffiti in the ancient city of
Babylon. Before anyone decries the desecration of this ancient site, the
walls being defaced by the GI's inscriptions are of recent origin. They
were built on top of the original walls in an act of grandiose vandalism
by Saddam Hussein, which did not endear the erstwhile dictator to
archaeologists. In fact al Jazeera notes that "The
English-language graffiti is not widespread and does not appear to have
caused extensive harm. Arabic script is also scrawled on the walls. US-led
forces have spent tens of thousands of dollars repairing ruins and
protecting them from looters, and are investigating whether US and Polish
heavy machinery and rotor wash from helicopters are inflicting damage."
As Major David Gilleran, an army chaplain on the site, wisely observed, "This
place represents the greatness in human history. We're just passing
through."
November 9th 2004
Vacuous Values Voters - in an
interesting piece on the role the
Christian religion played in the recent presidential election, Harley
Sorenson, writing for SFgate.com, comes up with a telling quote from
George W Bush in March 2001. Paraphrasing Lincoln, he quipped "You
can fool some of the people all of the time, and those are the ones you
have to concentrate on." It certainly worked on November 2nd 2004.
Bigot Unbowed - here is a
page from the BBC on the future ambitions
of
failed European Commissioner designate
and rabid religionist, Rocco Buttiglione. His appointment to the
Commission was effectively blocked following outrage at his opinions on
gays and the role of women, which closely toe the line followed by his
friend in the Vatican, Karol Wojtyla, aka the Pope. The snappy name for
the position taken by Buttligione is "theo-con" - and yes, it is as bad as
it sounds. It is
defined as a description of a
conservative who believes that "religion should play
a major role in forming and implementing public policy".
Buttiglione is an unpleasant individual who likes to disguise his
prejudices as something else - something he smugly regards as morally
superior - religious conviction. Label it how you will, it is a very good
reason for keeping this person away from any political office where he can
dictate to others. A secular Europe cannot allow his, or anyone else's,
superstitious beliefs to
become law in any way, shape or form. At
the moment he and his fellow religionists have been stymied, although many
states in thrall to Catholicism would like to see his influence grow.
Whilst Spain has turned its back on the malign influence of the Catholic
church,
newcomers to the Union such as Poland and
Malta are still, in many ways, under the
Vatican's thumb. It is not acceptable for a union of democratic states to
be influenced by a religious bloc of any kind. Such a move would impinge
badly on the ideal of inclusivity for a multicultural society. Meanwhile
Buttiglione is reduced to the old standby of thwarted religionists - he
whines about persecution - a subject on which the Catholic church is
expert, although it is rarely on the receiving end. Buttiglione
extrapolates falsely from his rejection by the European Parliament to the
denial of posts as teachers or professors to Catholics. This is absurd
scaremongering, as is his claim of being treated like a "Catholic
witch". He was not treated as a witch, but as a religious bigot
whose worldview is unacceptably warped by his beliefs. As a private
individual he is entitled to believe whatever nonsense he wishes - as a
politician in a pluralistic union whose individual citizens hold many
beliefs and none he is a dangerous and divisive anachronism. His avowed
intent to continue to push for "Christian values"
in Europe merely reveals that his selfish desire to impose his beliefs on
others is undiminished by his recent defeat. He, and those who follow his
agenda, should be strongly resisted at each and every opportunity, not
just within the EU but anywhere in the world.
"Men never do evil so completely
and cheerfully as when they do it from a religious conviction."
Blaise Pascal
Clone Quote - "Bush is entirely willing to
let patients die rather than abandon his symbolic acts of respect for
embryos (symbolic because funding does not affect the number of embryos
destroyed each year)," said Charo, the University of Wisconsin
professor, referring to the fact that in vitro fertilization clinics often
discard embryos not used by couples. From a
Wired article by Kristen Philipkoski.
November 11th 2004
Exit the Crisco Kid - and good riddance. US Attorney General John
Ashcroft has tendered his resignation in a letter to President Bush. His
tenure will be remembered for the erosion of civil liberties in the name
of security, his
excessive religiosity, and several high
profile terrorist cases that were more
hype than substance. The outgoing prude
will also be remembered for spending taxpayer's money (allegedly $8000) on
drapes to cover the bare breasts of a
statue of the Spirit of Justice. It seems he could not keep his mind on
the job with those nipples pointing at him. His time in office is summed
up by David Cole, a law professor at Georgetown University, in the
New York Times (reg rqd), . "We
had an attorney general who treated criticism and dissent as treason,
ethnic identity as grounds for suspicion and Congressional and judicial
oversight as inconvenient obstacles. He was a disaster from a civil
liberties perspective but also from a national security perspective."
What Cole neglects to mention is that Ashcroft's failings matched the Bush
Administration's shortcomings only too well. It would be hoped that things
can only get better. And then you see that one top contender mentioned by the New York Times to replace the
anointed one would certainly be no improvement. Alberto
R. Gonzales, White House counsel, is the author of the memorandum that
referred to the Geneva Convention as "quaint", and which blurred the lines
between interrogation and torture - the results of which were the outrages
at Abu Ghraib. Bush wouldn't choose him, surely?
Update - to the above. Yes, Bush has in fact
chosen Gonzales, giving a clear
indication that it is business as usual in his second term. Here is some
of Gonzales' wisdom, "The nature of the new war
places a —high premium on other factors, such as the ability to quickly
obtain information from captured terrorists and their sponsors in order to
avoid further atrocities against American civilians. In my judgment, this
new paradigm renders obsolete Geneva's strict limitations on questioning
of enemy prisoners and renders quaint some of its provisions." See
The Roots
of Torture from Newsweek for more. Great choice, George.
Especially when Gonzales' inadequate advice in summaries to the then
Governor of Texas on clemency pleas is considered. "On execution day in
Texas, it was the job of Gonzales to give Bush a summary of the case. The
summary was the last information standing between an inmate and lethal
injection. Gonzales provided 57 summaries to Bush. Gonzales intended for
the memos to be confidential, but author Alan Berlow obtained them under
Texas public information law. Berlow found that Gonzales routinely
provided scant summaries to Bush. The summaries, according to Berlow, ''repeatedly
failed to apprise the governor of crucial issues in the cases at hand:
ineffective counsel, conflict of interest, mitigating evidence, even
actual evidence of innocence.'' " For more on this see
Common Dreams. As for Gonzales'
connection with law firm Vinson & Elkins and Enron this
article is enlightening.
Quote - from Claire Braz-Valentine's 2002 outraged
open letter to John Ashcroft " ...you are out buying yardage to save Americans from
the appalling alarming, abominable aluminum alloy of evil, that terrible
ten foot tin tittie. You might not be able to find Bin Laden but you sure
as hell found the hooter in the hall of justice."
November 13th 2004
Breast Cancer Lies - in a disturbing parallel to the Roman Catholic
church's
officially sanctioned lies about the
inability of condoms to protect against HIV AIDS infection, women in
several American states are being told that having an abortion increases
the risk of breast cancer. In both cases the lies are in direct
contradiction to the best evidence and peddled because of religious
beliefs. This Associated Press
item says "Women
seeking abortions in Mississippi must first sign a form indicating they've
been told abortion can increase their risk of breast cancer. They aren't
told that scientific reviews have concluded there is no such risk."
It goes on to note that similar misleading information is offered to woman
in "Texas, Louisiana and Kansas, and legislation to
require such notification has been introduced in 14 other states."
Here are the
results of studies showing no such link
from among others, the US National Cancer Institute and a Danish survey,
which was conducted on the medical records of more than 1.5 million women.
For a woman to seek an abortion is traumatic enough without her being told
stressful lies in order to advance someone else's religious agenda. (Here
is a
piece telling how writer Scott Gold of
the LA Times was criticized for his exposure of this cancer scare crap by
his own editor! John Carroll accused Gold of not troubling to find a
scientist promoting the opposite view. What Carroll fails to realize is
that about the only maverick scientist on the subject has undergone a "pro-life
religious conversion" - which does not bode well for his
objectivity. Read the rest of Chris Mooney's
article and prepare for your blood to
boil.) Following the recent Republican electoral victories it can only be
expected that this deceptive and cruel abortion "counselling"
practice will become more widespread. From the White House downwards, the
awkward findings of science are having to take a back seat to prejudice
and superstition. Examples include the denial of a human element in the
causes of global climate change, the weakening of anti-pollution laws, and
the repeated attacks on the teaching of evolution. The latest skirmish on
the evolution front is taking place in Georgia in a court case concerning
disclaimer stickers added to school biology textbooks. The publicity given
to this is causing shame to many intelligent and educated folk. "We're
really busy. We have a lot to do. And here we are, having to go through
this 19th century argument over and over again," Sarah Pallas, a
biology and neuroscience at Georgia State University in Atlanta told
SeattlePI.com. Also quoted is doughnut
shop worker Maria Jordan, who said her Atlanta customers were shaking
their heads over the latest dispute. "Lord, don't we
have more important things to worry about?" she asked. "It's just a
flat-out embarrassment." Sadly for every Pallas or Jordan there
seems to be at least one person like Marjorie Rogers. It was she who
initially complained about the biology textbooks. "I
think the (evolution) theory is atheistic. And it's all that's presented.
It's an insult to their intelligence that they're only taught evolution."
The only insult here is to the American education system. If clods such as
Rogers have their way for long enough the US can kiss goodbye to any
medical or financial benefits from modern biological research as the torch
is passed to places such as the UK that aren't hamstrung by religionists.
Press on Bush - here are a couple of pages chronicling the world's
reaction to the Bush election victory. The BBC has a
round-up of how the news was greeted by
the Arab and Israeli press and from SFGate.com (the online presence of the
San Francisco Chronicle) is a
wider survey, taking in Germany, France,
Russia and Iran, among others. "Oh, that God the
gift would give us, To see ourselves as others see us" Even if the
view is less than flattering. The UK Daily Mirror said undiplomatically "How
Can 59,054,087 people be so DUMB?" but then ameliorated things
somewhat by adding "America is still a great country
-- generous, exhilarating, gloriously free of anything resembling a class
system -- and it will still be a great country long after Dubya has
slinked off to his retirement in Texas. Assuming he doesn't blow up the
world in the next four years." Iran's Kayhan International had this
to say "The Palestinians, Arabs and all Muslims need
to do some real soul-searching instead of feeling disappointed over George
Bush's victory. No one in the White House or Europe will provide a
solution to their problems. Expecting the wolf to safeguard the sheep is
the height of stupidity - a syndrome from which the Arab world is
suffering."
November 16th 2004
Sunken Dreams - a while back 80 wrote of Robert Sarmast (see
Atlantis Found and
What's In a Name?) and his quest for the
mythical city of Atlantis. In this case
the word mythical is not a misuse of that term (as legendary is so often
misused) but means exactly that - " lacking factual
basis or historical validity". This has not stopped Sarmast
announcing his discovery of structures on
the seabed near Cyprus, his favored location for Atlantis. His website
press announcement trumpets " The 6 day long,
privately-funded $200,000 expedition has confounded or at least confused
sceptics by bringing back scientific side-scan sonar data which supports
evidence from previous scans of the Eastern Mediterranean revealing
man-made structures (including a 3km long wall, a walled hill summit and
deep trenches) - plus old river beds - in exactly the formation and
proportions that Plato himself described for the Acropolis Hill of
Atlantis City in his works of 2,400 years ago." If the pictures
posted on his website are supposed to be
evidence for his discovery it would seem that
pareidolia is involved rather than anything resembling
archaeology. Pareidolia is "type of illusion or
misperception involving a vague or obscure stimulus being perceived as
something clear and distinct." This can be the supposed likeness of
the Virgin Mary on a
discolored window or a
fencepost, the
Face on Mars or, in this case, Atlantis
on the Mediterranean seabed. Until more convincing evidence is produced,
the jury is not only out on Sarmast's claims, but their interest has yet
to be engaged by anything worthy of attention. The name of his website,
DiscoveryofAtlantis.com, certainly seems a little premature. Mind you, if
80 had given up "a promising career in architecture
in order to pursue his lifelong passion for ancient history, world
mythology, and the search for lost civilizations." and spent the
aforementioned $200,000 on a search, only to come up with these blurred
scans, he too might indulge in a little pareidolia, if only to keep the
spirits up. Perhaps the inevitable TV documentary will help him recoup
some of his expenses, if not his time. 80 will be most interested to
follow developments closely, especially after
this quote from Sarmast "People
who dismiss this have not really done their homework, sceptics don't
really understand. To understand the enigma of Atlantis you have to have
good knowledge of ancient history, Biblical references, the Sumerian
culture and their tablets and so on." And so on, indeed. As he
evidently believes that he has done his homework, unlike historians
and archaeologists, it is to be hoped that the quality of evidence will
justify Sarmast's self-confidence.
Hello Arnie - ex-movie star, bodybuilder, and would-be statesman,
Governor of California Arnold Schwarzenegger has been in Japan this week,
trading on his great popularity there to try to drum up some business for
his home state. The Japanese have so taken Schwarzenegger to their hearts
they even have a pet name for the hulking politician - Schwa-chan - which
means 'my dear little Schwarzenegger,'
according this article from
SFGate.com. It seems he is treasured
there as a cultural icon rather than for any acting ability he may or may
not possess. "He has an appeal like a caricature --
like 'Hello
Kitty' or 'Godzilla,"
Michael Baskett, a film professor who specializes in Japanese cinema told
SFGate. "Taking roles like in 'The Running Man' and
the 'Terminator' series ... have kind of endeared him as a living animated
caricature." The Japanese prime minister, Junichiro Koizumi,
certainly got off on the right foot when
he met the governator. To Arnie's
flattering comment "You're very popular"
Koizumi came back with, "You too, more popular than
Bush." It is
no secret that Schwarzenegger would like
a crack at the US presidency and his film
star background would be no hindrance, unlike the fact that he was born in
Austria. Another part of his background, certainly less well known in the
US, is the string of highly bizarre adverts (some of which you can, er,
enjoy,
here) he made for various Japanese
companies in the 90's. It is worth bearing these in mind the next time you
see him attempting to project the gravitas appropriate to a statesman.
Unholy Traffic - regular readers will know that, since August this
year, 80 has been following the "miracle baby" saga involving the
self-styled archbishop, Gilbert Deya (see the whole story
here). Now a British high court judge has
ruled*
that a one year-old child, far from being a miracle from God and a
testament to the power of Deya's prayers, is the victim of a baby
trafficking scheme "motivated by financial greed"
reports the
Guardian. While the "parents" of miracle
babies may not have paid for them, considerable revenue was generated by
tithes collected from congregations who were swayed by the miracle hogwash
preached by Deya and others. The archbishop, who "says
he casts out devils, cures illnesses and helps infertile couples in his
congregation, estimated to be 36,000 strong, to have miracle babies."
is wanted in Kenya over allegations of child-trafficking in the slums of
Niarobi. According to the
Scotsman, the judge described Deya as was
"a self-serving and superficial witness who was only
too happy to distance himself from the facts". Quite why this
person is still at large in Britain is a mystery. (*Read
the full judgement
here. It makes very clear the cruelty of
child-trafficking and confirms that the judge believes the "miracle"
parents themselves were duped. This goes to show how sincere but gullible
and ignorant people can be manipulated by the unscrupulous, using their
religious faith. Thanks, Simon. For more on fleecing the flock, see
here.)
November 19th 2004
The
Epistle of Brown Nose Bob - even in the highly unlikely event of a
conciliatory and inclusive Bush second term there is still plenty of
pressure on the President to be otherwise. Here is a charming quote from a
congratulatory letter sent his way by right-wing religionist Bob Jones
III, of Bob Jones
University fame, to make sure that Mr Bush has his priorities
straight. "In your re-election, God has graciously
granted America - though she doesn't deserve it - a reprieve from the
agenda of paganism. Put your agenda on the front burner and let it boil.
You owe the liberals nothing. They despise you because they despise your
Christ." Exactly who this ignoramus thinks the pagans are is a
mystery - probably anybody who doesn't subscribe to his particular streak
of bigotry. He goes on to add " Undoubtedly, you
will have opportunity to appoint many conservative judges and exercise
forceful leadership with the Congress in passing legislation that is
defined by biblical norm regarding the family, sexuality, sanctity of
life, religious freedom, freedom of speech, and limited government. You
have four years—a brief time only—to leave an imprint for righteousness
upon this nation that brings with it the blessings of Almighty God."
Oddly the full text of his vicious little missive is now missing from his
university website, but luckily Google have it
cached. (this page has disappeared now)
Expect to hear more from Jones and similar nutcases now they have their
man in the White House for four more years.
The
Map Is Not The Territory - the US electoral result repercussions
rumble on. 20 year-old James Zetlen, has started a website called
sorryeverybody.com to apologize to the world for a second Bush
term in the White House. So far,
according to the BBC, his site has racked
up over 27 million hits and has spawned rival sites from Republicans who
are not sorry for anything. Elsewhere, maps purporting to depict US voting
patterns are very much in the news, from a jokey map of the United States
of Canada with a country called
Jesusland to the south, to one comparing
modern voter distribution today with the pre-Civil War so-called
slave states. Both of these have
predictably sparked some lively discussions and a lot of very strong
feelings. This
page, from
the University of Michigan, is very different. It displays maps, once
again of how the vote went, which also vividly illustrate that the way
the data is displayed has a great effect on the impression conveyed to the
viewer. It takes the now-familiar red/blue map that was shown throughout
the election by most news stations. and shows how, in many ways, what a
misrepresentation of the ground truth it actually was.
November 23rd 2004
Sacred Snippets - here are three quick hits from the whacky world of religion,
culled from the BBC news pages. First off is a storm in an ecclesiastical
teacup in Cambridge, England. Each year at Xmas minor celebrities of one
sort or another are invited to officially switch on the decorative lights
in the center of town. Normally this would be pretty much a non-event but
this year the council, in a break with tradition, invited ageing punk rock
band The Damned, to
do the honors. This bunch may have been
controversial 30 odd years ago but times have moved on for everyone -
everyone that is except some whiny clergymen who are raising objections to
the council's choice. They still don't seem to realize that their onetime
religious festival is now a secular orgy of consumerism. One miffed
reverend said sniffily, "They are a punk rock band
with very doubtful lyrics." Perhaps he should reflect on the fact
that his own bible contains enough
cruelty and violence to make any lyrics
by The Damned look pretty tame. Meanwhile a woman has placed a 10 year-old
toasted cheese sandwich on EBay. So far
it has attracted 100,000 hits. Why? It is supposed to have a likeness of
the Virgin Mary (her
again!) upon its surface. It has the miraculous snack's current
owner convinced. Florida resident Diana Duyser is quoted as saying "I
do believe that this is the Virgin Mary Mother Of God", although
this has not stopped her trying to turn a buck on the thing. She adds "I
would like all bidders to know that this item is not intended for
consumption". The Mary Sandwich has now
inspired rivals including a Pope Chop.
Meanwhile in Italy Karol Wojtyla, known to his followers as the Pope,
granted an audience to the actor who will
be playing him in a TV drama. The pontiff modestly told Polish actor Piotr
Adamczyk, "You're crazy to make a film about me.
What did I ever do?" How about blighted the life of millions,
Karol? As for being crazy, in 80's view that surely must be essential for
an accurate portrayal. This additional whacky item from Alaska, is really
whacky - in the chastisement sense. When Matanuska Christian School
principal Steve Unfreid found that two of his male pupils, aged 17 and 18,
had been caught
kissing girls in the locker room in front
of junior students he agonized long and hard as to how to respond. He woke
at 3am and prayed. Lo! He had the answer - later, at the school, he took
the boys to a basement room and had another teacher whip him with a belt
while they watched. Wow, some lesson. Not only will the boys forswear the
kissing of girls, but they both have shown a keen interest in male-on-male
consensual whipping. Chalk up another victory for Christian morality!
Unfried was subsequently fired.
November 25th 2004
No
Miracle - so says Coroner William Dolman “For
800 years coroners have been investigating unnatural deaths and this is
the first time that we’ve been asked to look into a miracle. I am quite
clear that no miracle took place and the scientific evidence is absolutely
clear on this. This woman claims she travelled to Nairobi to give birth to
this baby and she describes that birth in some detail. I’m convinced that
that birth never took place and that baby Sarah is not her child.”
Dolman, who was
investigating the death of a so-called
"miracle baby", confirmed that her DNA did not match that of her alleged
parents. So far the real parents have not been traced. This is but the
latest episode in the story of self-styled Archbishop Gilbert Deya, who
claims his prayers help infertile women to conceive. Deya is wanted by
police in Kenya who are investigating child-trafficking. Deya's wife,
Mary, has been charged with stealing a child from a Kenyan hospital. (see
Unholy Traffic)
Whingeing
Windsor
- royal atavist Charles Windsor is in the news once more, this time for
his views on education, which were read from a memo given in evidence at
an
industrial tribunal. One passage reads "What
is wrong with people nowadays? Why do they all seem to think they are
qualified to do things far above their capabilities? This is all to do
with the learning culture in schools. It is a consequence of a
child-centred education system which tells people they can become pop
stars, high court judges or brilliant TV presenters or infinitely more
competent heads of state without ever putting in the necessary work or
having the natural ability. It is a result of social utopianism which
believes humanity can be genetically engineered to contradict the lessons
of history." These few sentences provide a target-rich environment
for those who, like 80, are heartily sick of the millionaire dilettante's
ill-informed comments. So Charlie is concerned about those who " seem to think they are qualified to do things far
above their capabilities?" He should take a look in a mirror and
ask why does he consider himself qualified to make public pronouncements
on so many subjects in which he has no competence. The only reason his
observations on so-called complementary medicine, genetic engineering,
faith, or whatever his hobbyhorse of the moment is, are given any
attention is solely due to his inherited position and not to any great
knowledge or expertise. His remark about people being told that they can
become "infinitely more competent heads of state
without ever putting in the necessary work or having the natural ability."
reflects poorly on his own career - or lack of it. As for his comment
about "... social utopianism which believes humanity
can be genetically engineered to contradict the lessons of history."
What is he, but the result of centuries of genetic engineering the
old-fashioned way? In 80's view he is hardly an inspiring outcome after
all those years of assiduous inbreeding. Now
that is a lesson from history. (The Guardian has obligingly compiled a
selection of quotes illustrating
Windsor's view of the world. See
here for John O'Farrell's take on the
Prince's staff management skills. 80 has been reminded that the Prince
does a lot for charity - as if this somehow excuses his other activities.
He's a multimillionaire - by grace of his descent, he hasn't sweated for
any of it - in 80's view he should do a lot for charity.) For a
somewhat more sympathetic assessment, (certainly less rude than 80's rant) but
ultimately damning look at Charles and how he came to be the dysfunctional
figure he is today, read
this article by Johann Hari.
Quote - and now for an announcement from the French spokesman at
the Department of the Bleeding Obvious, President Jacques Chirac. "To
a certain extent Saddam Hussein's departure was a positive thing but it
also provoked reactions, such as the mobilisation in a number of
countries, of men and women of Islam, which has made the world more
dangerous. There is no doubt that there has been an increase in terrorism
and one of the origins of that has been the situation in Iraq."
Obvious to anyone outside the Bush/Blair axis of denial that is.
December 1st 2004
Holy Spam! - the
definition of spam as "unsolicited commercial email" is in need of
revision. It seems that religionists are sending messages offering
religious salvation - the fact that many recipients will find this
offensive and annoying has not perhaps occurred to them.
Message Labs, an anti-spam outfit,
told Silicon.com that such missives are
perfectly legal according to current legislation as there is no commercial
element. The example shown is some inane Christian blather about "I
will serve you, Lord, the rest of my life. Deliver me from all my sinful
habits. Set me free!" Incidentally, how you can be "set free" by
shackling yourself to some irrational superstition is a bit of a mystery.
It must cost something to send out such messages, but with no obvious
commercial intent perhaps the perpetrators hope to receive their reward in
heaven. This is perhaps the modern religionist's version of casting their
bread upon the waters, but mixed in with their pious, and doubtless
well-intentioned, emails are regular scam ones with a Christian gloss
using people's faith as an opening to con them. 80 has noted
before how the faithful are easy prey for
a convincing religious crook. Tune up your email filters to block this
modern plague - Message Labs reckon in the run-up to Xmas there will be
more of this junk arriving in your inbox as "even if
you have little money you can still send millions of messages."
This guy,
Chuck Taggart, seems to have the right
attitude to this unsolicited trash - including the religious stuff. "I
am a writer and editor, and as it's not my primary occupation, most of my
writing and editing is done in my spare time. Therefore, since I am
available for hire as a writer and/or editor, I will consider any
unsolicited email which fits into the description of "spam" as stated
above as a request for me to proof-read your email at a standard fee of
$300 per message. The terms for these services are 30-day net, with an
interest accruing after 30 days."
Literacy and Firefox
- astute observers may have noticed a couple of new buttons in the left
margin of this page. The first is an addition to the charity links called
the
Literary Site which, unsurprisingly,
seeks to promote literacy amongst the children of poor families. While
this currently only benefits children in the USA, it is 80's view that a
rise in literacy rates anywhere is a good thing. Additionally, as with the
other charity links, it costs you no more than a mouse click to make a
contribution. The other link featured leads to the download site of the
Firefox web browser. For years 80 has used the various
incarnations of Microsoft's Internet Explorer (IE) along with most of the
planet, but the availability of Firefox dictated a change. A huge number
of the security patches downloaded from Microsoft address vulnerabilities
in IE, even the latest version. Firefox is inherently safer (and much
easier to customize) although some sites do not yet work fully without IE.
80 uses Microsoft Front Page to write and publish on this site, which,
being a Microsoft product, does not adhere strictly to the standards laid
out for web pages. These problems are not visible in IE, being from the
same stable, but certainly show up when using Firefox. These can be
problems with the size and color of text and placement of items on a page.
As 80 spots such infelicities they are corrected but as this site now
contains over 70 pages not everything can be fixed immediately. So,
Firefox (and Safari and Opera) users please bear with the occasional
oddity in the appearance of 80's pages - as opposed to the oddity of their
content.
Cell Off -
diplomats at the UN have
given up efforts to agree a treaty that
would outlaw human cloning, as it seems that there is no chance of any
settlement. Costa Rica, backed by the US, wanted a worldwide ban on all
cloning, reproductive and therapeutic, on religious grounds. Belgium had
fielded a proposal banning reproductive cloning but allowing therapeutic
cloning, necessary for research into the medical uses of embyonic stem
cells. This non-result means that such promising research can proceed
unhindered. (See
Cell Block and and
Clone Clash.)
December 3rd 2004
Unholy Smoke - it would seem that the odor of
sanctity is carcinogenic. A study by Maastricht University and published
in the European Respiratory Journal shows that the air inside churches can
be much higher in carcinogenic polycyclic hydrocarbons than a busy road.
Furthermore, with the increase in candle consumption expected at Xmastime
the situation could get worse. The researchers found that the fine
particulate matter associated with the lengthy use of candles and incense
"can penetrate very deep into the lungs and trigger
various lung and heart conditions." The
PM10 levels after 9 hours of candle
burning represented "12 to 20 times the European
allowed average concentration over 24 hours". Upon hearing this
alarming news the Church of England stormed into action like the dynamic
organization it is. "This study certainly bears
further investigation, and we will keep a watching brief," a
spokesman wheezed. The researchers assessed the risk to priests and those
who work in churches as being greater than to members of the public, but
as this
BBC report puts it "However,
worshippers devout enough to spend several hours each day in church could
also be affected." The likelihood of contracting a fatal illness
with every breath you take while on your knees adoring the Creator
certainly brings a whole new meaning to that much-loved hymn "Nearer
My God to Thee".
Quote - from Thornton McCamish,
writing in The Age (reg rqd) " We seem to have ended up with secularism because
there was no other fair way of managing equal citizenship in a plural
society; no other reasonable way to share a globe overrun with jealous
gods. But what a thing to have achieved! A public ethos that embraces all
of us in its insistence on fairness and mutual respect here and now on the
beautiful, benighted Earth we share, not in the afterlife that we don't."
December 7th 2004
Vardy's Vacuity - here is an
article by Andrew Brown writing in
Prospect, where he asks the question "What happens
when the government's flagship "academy" schools are run by evangelicals
who want to teach creationism?" The whole article is of great
interest but 80 could not resist cherrypicking a quote from
Peter Vardy, the millionaire whose money
partially underwrites these particular academies. "....as
a guy who hasn't done a lot of studying and didn't do science at school, I
return to my faith position - I accept the view that God created the
earth, created man in his own image, quite how long it took him to do it I
haven't concerned myself about. As to the whole evolution proposition that
we have evolved from slime, I just find it impossible to accept. Obviously
things do evolve. But I don't think we evolved from a pile of slime on the
floor to the intricate things that we are today." This is a fine
example of what is known as the
argument from incredulity or the
divine
fallacy. What this boils down to is that understanding
evolution, and the scientific principles upon which it rests, is beyond
either Vardy's mental capacity or education to grasp. This he takes as
sufficient reason to claim it is his Judaeo-Christian God that is
responsible. This point of view is of zero use in understanding anything
about our universe whatsoever (see
The Shrinking Gaps). If this was merely
his personal opinion he would be welcome to it. However, the idea of
someone as ignorant as Vardy being
welcomed, or even merely permitted, to
pollute children's minds with this silliness via his educational
activities purely because his money is the right color is, not to put too
fine a point on it, repellent. If anyone doubts the intention of the these
religionist-funded academies to allow religious beliefs to affect the
whole of the school curriculum, read this
cached item originally from the
Vardy-backed Emmanuel Foundation, and now missing from their website. Also
take a look at
this lecture by Steven Layfield, Head of
Science at Emmanuel College in Gateshead, entitled "The
Teaching of Science - A Biblical Perspective." Here is part of the
introduction, " We are interested to know what the
Bible says about Science not because we wish to add a certain "religious
flavour" to our Science lessons but because the Bible provides us with, as
it were, spectacles through which the whole of reality can be sharply
focussed. At a most fundamental level of thinking there are really just
two alternative starting positions. One is characterised by the assumption
that man can find out all that is true by careful enquiry; the other
acknowledges the limitation of such endeavour and recognises the need for
us to accept Divine help. One is the rationalist voice of autonomous
humanism; the other is God-centred Christianity." It is deeply
worrying that this person is allowed into the science classroom at all -
remember, Layfield is supposed to be Head of Science not religious
indoctrination! There is a tendency in the UK to look at things like the
Cobb County stickers row (see Stick It to Creationism below) and think
smugly "Those crazy Yanks - that sort of nonsense couldn't happen here".
Wipe the grin off your face - it is happening right in your own backyard,
right now,
aided and abetted by your own government.
Unheeded Counsel? - here is another announcement from the
Department of the Bleeding Obvious, this time courtesy of the Pentagon's
Defense Science Board which consists of civilians appointed by
the military to give advice on scientific and technical issues. This
latest report would seem to be a little outside their remit. It
refers to the Islamic world's perception
of the USA and the Bush administration's singularly inept method of
bringing "democracy" to the Middle East. "Muslims do
not hate our freedom, but rather they hate our policies. The overwhelming
majority voice their objections to what they see as one-sided support in
favor of Israel and against Palestinian rights, and the long-standing,
even increasing, support for what Muslims collectively see as tyrannies,
most notably Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Pakistan and the Gulf
states.Thus, when American public diplomacy talks about bringing democracy
to Islamic societies, this is seen as no more than self-serving hypocrisy."
Will this have any noticeable effect on US policy? Not bloody likely.
Last Chance - if you lost out in your bid to be the proud owner of
a Virgin Mary toasted cheese sandwich or a Pope Chop (scroll down to
Sacred Snippets) you can now go one better with an icon more relevant to
today's world now posted on EBay -
Hello Kitty!
Stick It to Creationism - where it hurts. The concerted effort by
those who espouse
Creationism (or its poorly disguised
bastard offspring,
Intelligent Design) to sneak religion
into the science class
continues unabated in the US. Their
methods were described accurately in the 1984 anthology, "Science
and Creationism" by contributor Kenneth R. Miller. "The
American creationist movement has entirely bypassed the scientific forum
and has concentrated instead on political lobbying and on taking its case
to a fair-minded electorate... The reason for this strategy is
overwhelmingly apparent: no scientific case can be made for the theories
they advance." One of the latest ploys is to
deface
biology textbooks with stickers stating : "This
textbook contains material on evolution. Evolution is a theory, not a
fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be
approached with an open mind, studied carefully and critically considered."
This action has now become the subject of a lawsuit against the stickers
of the stickers, Cobb County, Georgia, school officials. One parent who
filed the lawsuit said "It’s like saying everything
that follows this sticker isn’t true." Apart from legal action of
this kind, 80 has always felt a certain amount of healthy ridicule has a
role to play too.
Colin Purrington, an evolutionary
biologist of
Swarthmore College, Pa. agrees, and has
posted a whole
range of stickers starting with the Cobb
County original and then applying that blinkered and ignorant attitude to
other subjects - "This textbook contains material on
gravity. Gravity is a theory not a fact, regarding a force not directly
seen.This material should be approached with an open mind, etc etc."
Other controversial subjects include the sphericity of the Earth,
heliocentrism and continental drift (plate tectonics). Scroll down the
page for suggestions as to how the stickers can be effectively displayed -
great stuff! Also see this hilarious site making the case for
Unintelligent Design - highly
recommended. (Thanks to Michael for pointing out the stickers page)
December 9th 2004
Shoot To Thrill?
- 80 has, until recently, been pretty ambivalent toward video games.
Lacking the reflexes for the genre called shoot-em-ups, the more
puzzle-based games appealed, but even then it is hard to shake the feeling
that two hours of playing, say,
Myst, is two hours wasted. The
ambivalence has gone now after seeing the son of a friend, S, playing
Grand Theft Auto - San Andreas
which is, 80 has been told, the latest in a popular series. Two things
were worrying - firstly he spent six hours straight playing the thing, and
secondly was the level of violence. This is not the violence of a fantasy
game but is set in realistic locations, and graphically depicted. When 80
looked over at the screen to see what S's frantic thumbing of his game
controller was achieving, it was not a pretty sight. He was controlling a
figure armed with a baseball bat, which was used to bludgeon repeatedly
another figure, lying prone on the sidewalk. Such was the realism that as
the bat hit, the prone figure's limbs jerked spasmodically with the force
of the blows. (S thought this was very funny and found 80's disgust
puzzling.) Another new game recently launched appears on a par with Grand
Theft Auto for taste, or more accurately the lack of it, although 80 has
not yet seen it played. With a release timed to coincide with the 41st
anniversary of that event,
JFK Reloaded is about the
assassination of President John F
Kennedy. The makers of this entertainment "said the
objective was for a player to fire three shots at Kennedy's motorcade from
assassin Lee Harvey Oswald's digitally recreated sixth-floor perch in the
Texas School Book Depository." Your score is determined by how
accurately your shots recreate those actually fired by Oswald that day. If
you accidentally shoot Jacquie Kennedy you have points subtracted.
According to
Wired.com "Each
shot can be replayed in slow motion, and the bullets can be tracked as
they travel and pass through Kennedy's digitally recreated body. Players
can choose to see blood by pressing a "blood effects" option."
Astoundingly, the thing's creators, a Scottish company called Traffic
Games, claim the intent is educational, and "was
designed to undermine the theory there was some shadowy plot behind the
assassination." If this daft assertion was intended to shield them
from accusations of bad taste it is a failure. Produce a violent piece of
trash if you must, but don't insult people's intelligence with such a
ridiculous justification. One wonders where the trend towards more violent
gaming will lead - and it seems the New York Post has found
the answer. John Lockwood, described as a
Texas entrepreneur, already has links on his website to allow participants
anywhere on the web to fire real guns, via their mouse, at targets on his
ranch, but now he wants to go one better. His latest big idea is to have a
rifle, controlled over the internet, pointed at a game feeder set up to
attract animals. Lockwood says "A feral hog might go
for $500, a black buck or axis deer for $1,500 to $2,000." This, in
80's view, is disgusting, and raises many questions, including what
happens if an animal is wounded by an inept marksman - will Lockwood have
someone available on the spot to end the creature's suffering? Like the
makers of the Kennedy game, Lockwood seems blithely unaware of how
revolting his entertainment is, treating it as the next stage of
development in what he calls hunting. Apparently he has received hate mail
calling him "a sick, despicable redneck." To
which 80 can only say bullseye! Technology has always been a two-faced
servant for humanity - the same level of engineering produced the sewing
machine and the machine gun. Now it seems that the advances that will lead
to remote life-saving surgery over the internet can also be used for the
slaughter of animals by idiots. (However, the ultimate shoot-em-up is not
yet available to the public - just the military and the CIA. Back in 2002
Hellfire missiles,
remotely fired from
Predator drone aircraft by an operator
many miles away, were used for assassinations.)
December 10th 2004
Bullshit - or, to be more accurate, cow dung is a substance that
many folk tend not to dwell on overmuch. However it seems that country
pancakes have more going for them than you might imagine - especially if
you talk to Hindu fundamentalists. These folk, perhaps better known for
inciting riots and generally being as
obnoxious and irrational as any other religious fundies, have decided to
harness their intellect to research on their sacred animal,
the
cow - or rather the cow's effluent. That the dung can be dried
and used as a fuel is hardly news, but Bhanwarlal Kothari, a senior member
of fundamentalist organization
Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) has found a new application
for this ubiquitous commodity. Perhaps with one eye on Muslim Pakistan's
nuclear weapons and missile tests, he says his researches "...
have shown that distemper made out of cow dung and spread over walls and
roofs can block nuclear radiation." Another bunch,
Vishva Hindu Parishad,
(VHP) has been working on that other bovine by-product, cow pee, and
surprise, surprise that too has amazing properties - at least in the mind
of Sunil Mansinghka. He is quoted in a
Wired.com article by Manu Joseph, as
saying "We believe that cows' urine can cure cancer,
renal failure, arthritis and a lot of other ailments". Believing it
is one thing, proving it is an entirely different matter. It adds a whole
new meaning to that charming expression "taking
the piss". Even these daft claims pale beside that made by one
Professor Madan Mohan Bajaj, of Delhi University's physics department. He
has been busy for the last 14 years studying the effects of animal
slaughter upon various types of disasters. He concludes "The
killing of animals causes natural and manmade disasters. But, since the
cow is so useful to human beings, its slaughter causes exceptional seismic
activity. The cries of the animals go down to the earth through
Einsteinian pain waves." On this basis one could expect large
slaughterhouses to be the epicenters of earthquakes - countries with
highly intensive factory farming such as Denmark ought to be shaking like
jelly - it is funny no one has noticed. As for "Einsteinian
pain waves" they doubtless emanate from the aching ribs of those
caught in helpless paroxysms of laughter at this fundamentalist claptrap.
Maps and T-shirts - that tell lies. A week or so back 80 wrote
about how the various cartographic representations of the US election
result could be very misleading because of the way the data was displayed.
(see
The Map is not the Territory) Reference
was made to the most egregious example shown by the bulk of the media
which totally misrepresented the actual voting data, resulting in a sea of
red states. This has not stopped
these nitwits marketing a T-shirt
emblazoned with that selfsame map. The text advertising this must-have
item gushes "President George W. Bush won with the
largest number of popular votes ever cast in American history!"
Only because of the size of the turnout - he still only polled just over
half of the total votes cast. "By popular demand,
NewsMax is now offering Bush Country 2004 – with the county by county map
showing how America has become even more RED. You can win every argument
with your liberal friends – just wear Bush Country and point to the map!"
Two observations - your liberal friends, if you have any, probably already
know you are a dumbass - wearing this shirt will merely confirm it. As for
"...America has become even more RED." 80
might be showing his age, but imagine what
Senator Joe McCarthy would have made of
such a statement.
Atlantean Hooey - here is a good piece from the
Hartford Courant about archaeologist
Kenneth L Feder and his take on the Atlantis story, including the latest
claim of discovery made by Robert Sarmast (see
Sunken Dreams). Feder is author of "Frauds,
Myths, and Mysteries: Science and Pseudoscience in Archaeology"
and teaches, as he has for the past 25 years, at Central Connecticut State
University. As far as he is concerned "Atlantis is a
plot device. Plato has a very specific agenda in his mind, and he needs
Atlantis to prove what he's trying to say." He is happy to use the
Atlantis myth as an introduction to discuss real history and archaeology
but has noticed a growing belief in such fables during his time in
teaching. The proportion of new students who think Atlantis was a real
place has grown over the last twenty years, from 30 t0 50 per cent in his
estimation. "I think that pattern directly reflects
how many documentaries on (pseudoscientific subjects) show up on
television, especially cable TV." Anyone who has seen some of the
tripe peddled on supposedly factual shows can only nod in agreement. As
for Sarmast, Feder says "I'm going to assume that
the guy's honest and sincere and he really thinks there's this connection,
but for anyone looking at it from the outside, there just isn't enough
information." (thanks to the
Explorator newsletter)
December 12th 2004
Implausible Stories
- perhaps 80 lacks imagination - if while out driving you were caught by a
police radar camera which showed you had exceeded the speed limit and you
wished to contest this finding, wouldn't you try and think of a plausible
excuse? This would be plausible as in "within the realm of credibility" -
anything else would likely be counterproductive in convincing a cynical
police officer, who must have heard it all before. Or maybe some folk
think if the excuse is original or far-out enough, perhaps the cop would
drop any charges in sheer amazement. This latter course of action would
seem to have been adopted by those motorists who made it to the top ten
excuses list made public by the
Safe Speed For Life website. Number 1,
and deservedly so, is this little gem "I had passed
out after seeing flashing lights, which I believed to be UFOs in the
distance. The flash of the camera brought me round from my trance."
This clown, far from evading a penalty is asking for a driving ban.
Slightly more plausible was excuse number 2 "I was
in the airport’s flight path and I believe the camera was triggered by a
jet overhead, not my car." The two that appeal most are those with
an element of the mercy dash to them, namely number 5 "My
friend had just chopped his fingers off and I was rushing the fingers to
hospital" and number 7 "I had to rush my
dying hamster to the vets."
Quote - from a
wonderfully
vitriolic piece by Maureen Dowd, writing
in the New York Times (reg rqd) on the subject of Christmas. "If
I hear "Frosty the Snowman" one more time, I'll rip his frozen face off."
Fat Profits from
Slimming - the slimming industry in the USA alone is reckoned to be
worth around $40 billion a year. Many people aware of the huge numbers of
folk on the planet who are malnourished will find this figure obscene.
This time of the year in the western world is reserved for overindulgence
in food and drink, using holidays such as Thanksgiving and Christmas as an
excuse for gluttony. This provides the food and diet companies great
opportunities to make a killing, and not just of turkeys. Firstly is the
selling of all the festive foods and then, after their consumption, there
is the sale of various diets which claim to help lose the pounds gained.
The important thing about the diets and schemes offered to slimmers is
that in the long run they must be ineffective in order to ensure continued
sales of the product.
Repeat business is essential. For a
rundown on various dodgy diet schemes take a look here at
Diet Scam Watch
- the site is new but already has a lot of useful information. The best
rule to follow when looking at any slimming product or program is the old
one - if it sounds too good to be true then it is likely worthless. For a
good illustration of how a slimming product can be marketed go to
FatFoe's web
page and read the blurb there "Wouldn’t
it be nice to enjoy your favorite foods – pizza, pasta, fried chicken,
gooey chocolate deserts – and watch the pounds melt away? Best of all,
wouldn’t it be nice to have the trim, shaply figure you’ve always wanted
without having to diet or exercise? NOW – FINALLY – YOU CAN!" To be
honest this page is more than it appears - click any of the links there to
see why. For a look at that slimmer's dream, "the
low-carb diet in a pill" see Ben Goldacre's
Bad Science column in the Guardian, where
he comprehensively shreds the the rationale behind the hype, and questions
the manufacturer,
Vortex Health's claims of clinical
trials. If diets sold to the public are in the main questionable in their
effectiveness, how about one with a divine mandate - that's got to be the
answer, right? Johann Hari mentions just such a diet in an excellent
article provocatively titled "How
can intelligent people use alternative medicine?". In this he
encounters a book called, wait for it, "What
Would Jesus Eat?" This cleverly brings together fad diets and
religiosity in one ridiculous package, blending the lucrative believer and
slimmer markets together. As Don Colbert, the perpetrator/author of this
volume puts it, "If you truly want to follow Jesus
in every area of your life, you cannot ignore your eating habits."
This of course means taking on the
weird dietary rules laid down in that handy slimmer's manual,
the Christian bible. The books
Leviticus and
Deuteronomy, so beloved of
Christian
homophobes, is also full of advice on what is clean and unclean
to eat. The basis for most of this seems arbitrary and full of errors -
did you know that insects have
four legs - and that rabbits
chew the cud? A particular blow to 80 was
to find that shrimp and other crustacea and shellfish are an abomination.
The
lesson to take away from all this is that
when reading any of the diet and slimming ads it is important to remember
one thing - these people are after your money, whether they give their
schemes a religious gloss or not. The place to get
trustworthy
dietary information is from properly accredited health
professionals (no, not Gillian
McKeith) - not from someone driven by profit. (Still with diet,
here is an interesting article by Louise
France looking at Britain's unhealthy obsession with the Devil's food -
the humble potato crisp. The Brits "buy more bags of
crisps than the rest of Europe put together, second only to the United
States. At Christmas, sales rise by 20 per cent.")
December 14th 2004
Hush My
Mouth? - no chance. Britain already has
adequate laws to deal with hate crimes so why does the Home Secretary, the
currently beleaguered David Blunkett, want to introduce legislation to
deal specifically with religious hatred? The invasion of Iraq and the
so-called war on terror are likely factors influencing the decision, which
the cynical would say is purely to win Muslim votes in the next general
election. After the atrocities of 9/11 and subsequent terrorist attacks by
fundamentalists, many Muslims feel that they are being unfairly blamed for
the acts of a minority and would like to see legislation protecting them
from abuse on religious grounds. Also, as a consequence of the turmoil in
Iraq and Tony Blair's blind allegiance to George W Bush's crusade, Muslim
voters have been losing faith in the Labour Party and increasingly turning
to the Liberal Democrats, the latter having consistently opposed the
invasion of Iraq. The danger with Blunkett's proposal is that it will
stifle legitimate free speech and criticism of religious belief. This
criticism can often make its point by mockery, a device 80 certainly uses.
Who decides when mockery becomes hatred? Rowan Atkinson, comedian and
actor, who has done his fair share of such mockery,
expressed his concerns in the Guardian, "To
criticise a person for their race is a manifestly irrational and
ridiculous. But to criticise their religion - that is a right. That is a
freedom. And a law that attempts to say you can criticise or ridicule
ideas, as long as they are not religious ideas, is a very peculiar law
indeed. It all points to the promotion of the idea there should be a right
not to be offended... In my view, the right to offend is far more
important than any right not to be offended." The thought that in
Britain the absurd and irrational beliefs of religionists, of whatever
stripe, cannot be held up to ridicule is in itself ridiculous. An
additional concern is that the effect may in fact be
the opposite to that intended. Dominic
Grieve the shadow Attorney General and a church warden, says that the
implementation of a similar law in Australia has served to increase
intolerance. As far as 80 is concerned, whatever the outcome, religious
belief and its malign effect on the world will continue to receive exactly
the same treatment as before. 80's prescription is toleration tinged with
a healthy dose of ridicule and no respect whatsoever. (also see
Religionist Hatred and
Islamophobia.)
Slay Ride for Santa - the seasonal silliness has affected that
august body the Royal College of Psychiatrists. Their news page carries an
item about a paper in the Psychiatric Bulletin called
What if Santa Died? Dr. Lynda Breen
argues that Santa Claus, real or not, is a symbol of hope and "belief
in him teaches children the values of role models, family bonding and
sharing, as well as helping the young to think more constructively."
How belief in an imaginary, benevolent, bearded fat man who hangs out with
elves and creeps into your bedroom at night can help kids think more
constructively is beyond 80's comprehension. In an invited reply, Dr. Mark
Salter finds no reason to think that belief in S.Claus encourages
benevolence, but he does hold some odd beliefs of his own. He warns "...we
should beware. Increasingly, in a society that unwisely holds rationality
above all else, the significance of myths and magic are being slowly and
subtly eroded." What's more "Dr. Breen is
offering us a seasonally-flavoured warning, asking us to contemplate not
the death of Santa, but of imagination..." To which 80 can only
say, what hogwash - failing to believe in some saccharine myth has nothing
to do with the death of imagination. The Santa story with all its props
such as elves, presents and flying reindeer is a fait accomplit and
actually requires little imagination. At this time of year it is well nigh
impossible to avoid seeing images of Claus and his entourage in every
store and mall. Contrary to Breen's assertion, what this world needs is
less myth and magic and a damn' sight more rationality. Furthermore,
equating rationality with the death of imagination is nonsensical -
imagination and rationality combined, one tempered by the other, is one of
humanity's greatest strengths. Two views of the Santa paper by Rebecca
Tyrrel, who is for telling children sweet lies, and Francis Wheen (author
of
How Mumbo-Jumbo Conquered the World) who
is very much against, are in this
article from the Daily Telegraph. Wheen's
attitude is definitely in accord with 80's, and, sad to admit, more
eloquently expressed, "This is one of the oldest,
most pernicious myths of all – that reason and science are incompatible
with a sense of wonder and magic. The creation of the internet and the
mapping of the human genome are far more awe-inspiring than Madonna's
silly Kabbalah cult and Cherie's (Blair) healing crystals, and they have
the great advantage of being founded in reality. With so many genuine
marvels, who needs Father Christmas?" Hear, hear.
Santa Under Siege - It seems that some kids have not only lost
their belief in Santa but are actively aggressive toward the benevolent,
bearded fat man. This year in Clackmannanshire, Scotland he has been given
police protection after attacks by crowds of
stone-hurling teenagers. Meanwhile in
Llanelli, Wales children visiting Santa in his grotto will not only sit
next to the old chap and not on his knee but will also be
under observation by live CCTV cameras.
This is all in an effort to protect the jolly mythical figure from
accusations of improper conduct. Aah, the magic of Christmas......
December 16th 2004
Second Front - a new battle has opened in the war (make no mistake
- it is a war) to inject religion into the US public school system, only
this time it is over on the West Coast, a long way from Georgia and the
anti-evolution brigade. (see
Stick It to Creationism) Steven Williams,
a history teacher in Cupertino wants to teach his 5th graders at Stevens
Creek Elementary School that religion, (he actually means Christianity,
his own faith) was central to the Founding Fathers. Some may approve of
this tacking on of his beliefs to the school curriculum - others are less
than impressed with his efforts. One parent, Mike Zimmers,
told the SF Chronicle that "My
daughter came home one day and said, 'Mr. Williams talks about Jesus 100
times a day'." Zimmers (and his daughter) are some of the many folk
who object to Williams evangelizing in the classroom. Like many overly
zealous Christians, who are obsessed with spreading the "good news" where
it does not belong, Williams has now resorted to legal action. "Last
month, Williams filed suit in federal court in Oakland claiming that
administrators were "systematically rejecting" any reference to God or
Christianity in his handouts. Williams said his speech and academic
freedom had been restricted "because of its religious content and
viewpoint." That Williams thinks he can breach the
wall between church and state, enshrined
in the Constitution, is emblematic of the unthinking arrogance of many
bible bashers. The rule surely cannot apply to them, for they have God on
their side. He is being paid to teach history not theology - if he wants
to tell of his beliefs he should do it in his own time and not in class.
Naturally the dispute has sparked the usual intelligent reaction from the
fundamentalist right, who must be feeling feisty after the recent election
result. The familiar pitiful cries of persecution have gone up (they
should have lived in
Diocletian's day) and emails have arrived
at the school with helpful comments like "all of you
in the school district can burn in hell." It is also part of the
fundies' propaganda to wilfully misunderstand the issue, and hysterically
claim that the school is "banning the Declaration of
Independence". With Williams now due to appear on that bastion of
unbiased news reporting, the Fox News cable network, this storm is
possibly going to need a bigger teacup. Perhaps Williams would like to add
to his handouts in history class a few, easily accessible quotations from
the Founding Fathers themselves. In fact, for a teacher of history, it
seems odd that he is unaware of them - or perhaps he ignores them as they
do not further his evangelical agenda.
"The United States of America should have a
foundation free from the influence of clergy." George Washington
“Twenty times in the course of my late reading, have
I been upon the point of breaking out, ‘this would be the best of all
possible worlds, if there were no religion in it.’ " John Adams
“[A]n amendment was proposed by inserting ‘Jesus
Christ,’ so that [the preamble] should read ‘A departure from the plan of
Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion’; the insertion was rejected
by a great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the
mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and
Mohammedan, the Hindoo and Infidel of every denomination” Thomas
Jefferson
For more on the Founding Fathers' opinions of religion and government take
a look at
America's Most Famous Deists and also
America--Not a Christian Nation.
Satanic Profits - before we all become sated with seasonal Santa
stories 80 could not resist just one last one (for now). In a bid to stand
out from the crowd, tourist attraction the
York Dungeon has a seasonal Santa grotto
with an anagrammatic twist -
Satan's Grotto. This features, according
to
Yorkshire PostToday, instead of the
traditional Santa "a dark, cloaked figure, with a
red face and horns. Sprawling on a throne, Satan will be handing out gifts
such as severed fingers and other body parts, and practical jokes. He will
wish revellers a Horrible Christmas and present them with a scroll to sign
their souls away." To complete the fun are elves on spikes,
spit-roasted robins and Santa himself boiling in a cauldron. Surely there
is nothing here for anyone to object to? There is if you are whiny "Best-selling
author and retired vicar Graham Taylor". It is his belief that the
Grotto "is making a mockery of Christian
celebration." Since when did elves and reindeer and a red-clad
fatman feature in the nativity fable? For a retired clergyman Taylor's New
Testament knowledge seems a bit shaky - perhaps that is why he is an
ex-vicar. To further display his ignorance he calls Christmas "Our
most important Christian festival...." Surely that should be
Easter? He also scores low marks for history as well - the winter solstice
was being celebrated for thousands of years before the merriment was
hijacked by Christians (see
Our Pagan Christmas). Perhaps his moaning
is little more than a thinly-disguised plug for his books, one of which,
Shadowmancer, has proved popular
enough to be made into a
movie. It is a stirring tale of good
versus evil, although the Amazon review had this to say "...
the author, an English vicar himself, tells a very Christian story and his
often deliciously dramatic adventure lapses into stiffly presented
glowing-halo "Touched by an Angel" moments..." Taylor may write
what most of us would consider fantasy but he certainly believes that
supernatural evil is abroad in the world today "The
grotto is in very bad taste. Satanism is a very real thing."
Satanism is not, in 80's view, "a very real thing"
but for those selling fantasy books on the subject it can, no doubt, be a
very lucrative thing. While Taylor's comments won't have harmed his book
sales, a side effect (known as the
St Tibulus Corollary) of the concomitant
publicity is likely to prove beneficial to the bottom line at Satan's
Grotto as well.
December 18th 2004
No
Still, Small Voice - but rather a petulant, whiny one. In a world
where one billion children caught up in the turmoil of war, famine and
poverty have been
denied a childhood what is it that raises
the ire of Christian Voice? What is it that has them mounting a
frenzied email and telephone campaign?
Can it be the horror that is Darfur, the countless Iraqi civilians, women
and children trying to survive in a country that is little more than a
shooting gallery, or perhaps the millions of people in Africa infected
with HIV AIDS? No, Christian Voice, a self-described "prophetic
ministry"
has no time for such trivialities - not when someone has dared to stage a
play, in St Andrews, Scotland, portraying Jesus and his disciples as
homosexuals. The work,
Corpus Christi,
by American playwright Terence McNally was first performed in 1997 and is
described in this
BBC report as "a
modern retelling of the Gospels, taking place in the Texan town of Corpus
Christi". This is condemned by these religionists as "blasphemous".
Stephen Green, director of Christian Voice has not, of course, actually
seen the play (neither has 80, but then 80 is not whining about it). His
comments are revealing, "The fact is that Jesus
Christ is being portrayed here as a foul-mouthed, drunken, promiscuous,
homosexual and that is an insult to my faith." If Green has not
seen the play how come he knows so much about its depictation of Jesus?
And how, pray, can one insult what is nothing more than an unsubstantiated
belief? What he means is that he and his group feel insulted. Tough, 80
feels insulted whenever a religionist claims that without religious faith
one can have no morals - so what? Live with it. He also adds a touch of
Old Testament style prophecy (after all, it is Christian Voice's forte) "Quite
apart from that, God is not mocked, and I fear for the town of St Andrews
which has allowed this blasphemous, hate-filled mockery." 80 is
waiting with bated breath to see what Green's loving God has in store for
the town - fire and brimstone perhaps, or something a little less Cecil B
deMille, such as killing all of the firstborn? This is what Green would
like to see no doubt. The Daily Record
describes his agenda thus, "He
wants ancient blasphemy laws to be strengthened, and opposes divorce,
abortion, homosexuality and laws against religious hatred." He
sounds a right little Taliban wannabe. Corpus Christi, whether a good or
bad play, is, oddly enough exactly the sort of thing that would be
targeted by Home Secretary Blunkett's religious hatred law. Fortunately
the chances of that particular misguided proposal actually becoming law
seems to be
receding. As for Christian Voice,
they need to realize that the world has moved on, and their dictum "The
only hope for our dysfunctional nation lies in the person of the Lord
Jesus Christ." insults British Muslims, Jews, Hindus, Sikhs,
Wiccans, pagans, atheists, agnostics, Scientologists and disciples of the
Tooth Fairy.
Donald Ducks - the question."You go to war
with the Army you have, not the Army you might want or wish to have at a
later time." so said US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld,
replying to a
complaint from a soldier about the lack
of combat equipment available for troops serving in Iraq. If you are the
victim of a preemptive attack, such as Pearl Harbor, then yes, you are
plunged into war with "the Army you have". But when you are launching the
preemptive strike yourself, the time of which is dictated by political,
not military considerations, there is no good reason for troops to be
ill-equipped. Soldiers cannot fight a war armed with spin and platitudes -
a lesson Rumsfeld has obviously yet to learn. (Be sure to check out
Rummy's Greatest Hits by Mark Fiore)
The
Big Question - is which is the scientific ignoramus here? Is it the
New York Post (NYP) or is it the Fox TV network? One said it , the other
reported it uncritically. This quote
coming up (wait for it) is taken from a piece in the NYP, reporting that
Rupert Murdoch's outfit wants to make a drama series to cash in on the
current popularity of
Lost, an example of what the NYP calls a
"shipwrecked" show. Only Fox are making it a sci-fi*
drama series, "Darkside" - and this is how it is described " Plans are under way at Fox — which wants to make a
"Lost" of its own — for a new series about a group of of astronauts who go
missing after tracing a distress signal to the dark side of the moon. When
they arrive on the other side of moon (sic) —
which is cloaked in perpetual darkness and beyond radio contact with earth
— they discover a mysterious compound." 80 will hazard a guess -
this mysterious compound fiendishly erases from the human brain any
knowledge of basic astronomy that may lurk there. More than that, it
completely removes the desire to undertake even the slightest smidgeon of
basic research, just to make sure your plotline isn't silly crap. NYP and
Fox are the new Dumb and Dumber. Remember, it was the geniuses at Fox that
gave us "Conspiracy
Theory: Did We Land on the Moon?"
*As opposed to science fiction or SF, a genre where the laws of
physics, while they may well be bent, are not pissed on.
December 20th 2004
Sanctified Tat - time for another swift roundup of news from the
wacky world of religion. First up is Cardinal Cormac Murphy O'Connor,
perhaps best known on 80's pages for allowing a known paedophile*
to continue working as a priest,(see
Whited Sepulchre)
and
here fulminating because "Christian
symbols are being denigrated over the Christmas period". What
rattled his cage was the Madam Tussaud's waxwork
nativity scene (which has now been
damaged by "a
vandal" - as opposed to an Ostrogoth or Lombard or, gulp, a
Christian.) by featuring various celebrities, leading him to say "It
seems incredible that Christianity, particularly Christmas, is displayed
in a way that is so tasteless." Hard to know where to start really
- just how Christian are the Christian symbols that he feels are being
denigrated? The Virgin Mother and Child is a popular image particularly
with O'Connor's own sect, the Roman Catholics. Is it original to them? No
- see how the Virgin and Child motif was a part of
Egyptian religion long before Christianity. December 25th was
the birthday of the savior god
Mithras before the Christians claimed it
for their own savior. For a fascinating essay on the true origins of the
"Christian" midwinter birth feast
see here. As for O'Connor's comment that
Christianity is being "displayed in a way that is so
tasteless" he should walk by 80's local Catholic church. Outside is
a shop selling tawdry little statues in garish colors of Jesus, his mother
and assorted saints. As for the grisly little crucified man statuettes,
complete with copious blood flows the less said the better. (see
here for more tasteful Catholic items)
O'Connor should make sure his own church is not guilty of the sin of
tastelessness before casting stones at others. Elsewhere, another
Christian sect, the Russian Orthodox Church, are
deep in deliberations as to which saint
should be head honcho of the internet. The Roman Catholics tend towards St
Isidore of Seville. 80 has a charming statuette of this character (utterly
tasteless, naturally) with long white hair and beard, clutching a laptop -
the old boy even glows in the dark. It would of course be anathema to the
Orthodox to share a patron saint, so they have two other contenders, Saint
John Chrysostom, and Saint Feofan the Hermit. A quick scan of John's
life
story reveals no obvious connections with information
technology. Feofan, a 19th century hermit, is an equally mysterious choice
although the 21st century geek, home alone, hunched over his monitor, may
well be the modern equivalent of a hermit. At least the Roman Catholics
have
some basis for Isidore getting the job as
he "wrote the well-known 'Etymologies' (a type of
dictionary), (and) gave his work a structure akin to that of the database."
Mmm, very convincing. Meanwhile, the Orthodox church still have a lot to
learn about the Internet and the dangers it can represent, if Deacon
Andrey Kurayev is anything to go by, "If we get a
patron saint for the internet, the next logical step will be to formulate
a prayer to deal with viruses." Quite so, very logical, Andrey -
and God help the poor soul who gets to do your tech support.
* The Catholic church's embarrassing and devastating
record of child abuse by priests now has a counterpart in the Islamic
world -
according to this BBC report "A
Pakistani minister has revealed hundreds of cases of alleged child sex
abuse at Islamic schools, or madrassas." Naturally the minister has
received great support for his brave revelations from fanatical clerics -
they have sent him the usual death threats.
December 22nd 2004
The
Unexamined Life - is not worth living. So said Socrates, at least
according to Plato. 80 would also like to suggest an unexamined religion
is not worth having, although many religionists are unlikely to agree with
this. Charles Moore,
writing in the Daily Telegraph, has
raised howls of fury with a question as to whether, in some modern eyes,
the prophet Mohammed would be considered a paedophile. He based this on
the tale of the prophet's marriage when aged 53 to a girl of 9. Moore
makes short work of such a view pointing out "it
seems anachronistic to describe Mohammed as a child-molester. The marriage
rules of his age and society were much more tribal and dynastic than our
own, and women were treated more as property and less as autonomous
beings." Moore only raised the question to illustrate how UK Home
Secretary David Blunkett's religious hatred law would impact upon being
able to even pose such a question. Where religious faith rests upon a book
that is claimed to be not only inerrant but actually holy in some way then
that book, whether it is the Christian Bible or the Quran or any other
scripture, should be examined to get at the truth of such claims. This is
not hatred or blasphemy but a process of rational inquiry - if, say,
archaeology or independent verifiable sources
contradict the holy book then the
religionists will have to live with it. Draconian religious hatred laws or
threats of violence should not be allowed to stifle such inquiry. Where
religion makes claims that are testable, whether they are miraculous cures
or apparitions or the inerrancy and historical veracity of a book, they
should be rigorously examined. (Something such as faith, it is claimed, is
beyond the realm of such investigation, but with
studies into the effect that our genes
have in many areas maybe even this nebulous concept will undergo rational
scrutiny.) If a belief or faith or political ideology is damaged or shown
to be false by such examination then the question must be asked as to
whether whether it was worth having in the first place. (see
here for comment on the misguided and
hysterical overreaction to Moore's article from the
Muslim
Association of Britain.)
Update - to the above. Polly Toynbee
writing in the Guardian notes what
strange allies are backing the campaign against the proposed religious
hatred legislation, and makes the point that many misunderstand its
purpose. "Dead prophets and holy books would be as
open to criticism and ridicule as ever. The law will protect the
believers, not their beliefs." Citing the Australian experience,
Toynbee decides "This will be a bad law, inflaming,
not calming, religious passions. Prosecutors will not have to prove a
breach of the peace occurred, nor that one was likely, nor even that one
was intended." She also cites the
recent arrests of neo-nazi thugs as proof
that existing laws are capable of dealing those attempting to incite
hatred although
elsewhere in the Guardian this is
disputed..
Do
not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not
believe in traditions because they have been handed down for many
generations. Do not believe anything because it is spoken and rumored by
many. Do not believe in anything because it is written in your religious
books. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers
and elders. But after observation and analysis, when you find that
anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and the benefit
of one and all, then accept it and live up to it. - The Buddha, Kalama
Sutra
It
is morally as bad not to care whether a thing is true or not, so
long as it
makes you feel good, as it is not to care how you got your money as long
as you have got it. . . . . . . . . . For me, it is far better to grasp
the Universe as
it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and
reassuring.
Which attitude is better geared for our long-term survival? Which gives us
more leverage on our future? And if our naive self-confidence is a little
undermined in the process, is that altogether such a loss? Is there not
cause to welcome it as a maturing and character-building experience? -
Edwin Way Teale, Circle of the Seasons
December 23rd 2004
Thou Shalt Not - make an asinine spectacle of thyself. An
attempt by an Alabama judge to get the 10
Commandments into his courtroom shows a certain amount of ingenuity, even
if he probably looks like an extra from an old biblical epic. Judge Ashley
McKathan is attracting
criticism from the
American Humanist Association for his
homegrown version of holy haute couture. He has had his judicial robes
embroidered with the Decalogue in gold thread. Apparently "The
commandments were described as being big enough to read on the robe by
anyone near the judge, but not like eye-catching slogans on T-shirts."
80 has yet to track down a picture of this righteous robe but the mind
boggles. Astoundingly, McKathan claims "The Ten
Commandments can help a judge know the difference between right and wrong."
Anyone needing that kind of help should not be sitting in judgement upon
others - he can't have that many defendants arraigned before him accused
of coveting their neighbor's ass. Besides,
which version of the 10 Commandments is
McKathan using - there are at least two versions, one in
Exodus 20 and another in
Exodus 34? (Moses
broke the first tablets of stone in a
temper tantrum).Then, of course, these two versions are also available in
widely varying translations. Perhaps McKathan has them all on there in
gold thread, thereby transforming his robes into a judicial Las Vegas era
Elvis suit - which would certainly make for a striking presence in the
courtroom.
Bad
Science Badmouthed - do take a look at Ben Goldacre's selection of
recipients/targets for the
2004 Bad Science Awards in the Guardian.
The unusual categories should pique your interest, including "Award
for outstanding innovation in the use of the title 'Doctor'" and "Bad
Science celebrity of the year" 80's favorite is "Least
plausible cosmetics claim". One entry in this category is described
by Goldacre thus "PO2 Contour Cream from
Laboratoires Herzog is a "patented stabilisation of oxygen within a cream"
that "puts oxygen back into the skin, reoxygenates skin cells, encourages
natural rejuvenation". It sounds like bollocks; but it smells like
peroxide." Which may be better than the other way round............
The
Farce - is with you, especially if you are a US taxpayer. Or more
accurately it is with the Missile Defence Agency. The so-called Star Wars
missile defence shield has
failed in its latest test. An interceptor
missile shut itself down on the pad instead of chasing after a previously
launched target missile with a dummy warhead. The inability to carry
through a launch and intercept when you actually launched the target
yourself, says volumes about any launch on demand capability - the whole
rationale for such a system. George Bush's
stated goal of having a basic shield in
place by the end of 2004 is beginning to look foolishly optimistic.
(Update - this deadline is now
scrapped) It would be pointless deploying
the system before it has been proved capable of doing the job (although
this may yet happen for purely political reasons). The job, it seems at
the moment, would be to intercept a possible
missile attack from North Korea - there
do not seem to be any other candidates for the role. How this expensive
and so far unproven system would make the US safe from a far more likely,
and insidious delivery system is unknown. Such a delivery system crosses
the USA's land borders every day by the thousand - it is called a truck.
Revealing Searches - talk about reinforcing stereotypes. For years
now geekdom has contemptuously and unfairly referred to AOL's browser and
connection package as the internet with stabilizers/training wheels, with
less-than-flattering implications for the intelligence of AOL's clients.
Those who disagree with this sweeping judgement (including 80) will find
their position somewhat undermined by the results of a survey telling us
AOL users' 50 most searched words for 2004. The top three, in descending
order, are horoscopes, lyrics and hairstyles. See
The Register for more.
December 24th 2004
Sikh Censorship - the author of the play Behzti - Dishonour,
Gurpreet Kaur Bhatti has gone into hiding. This Guardian
report quotes a friend, Shakila Taranum
Mann as saying "She has been threatened with murder
and told to go into hiding by the police. She is personally paying a high
price, she feels this is an attempt to censor her. It is mob rule."
In a further development the
Birmingham Stage Company has said they
will stage Behzti at another location in Birmingham. Actor-manager Neal
Foster, said "The story cannot end here. I think
freedom of expression is more important than health and safety."
Foster is right, a stand must be made against attempts by religionists,
whether it is Sikhs
resorting to violence or Roman Catholics
pressuring the BBC (see
Popetown Shutdown), to dictate what the
rest of society may or may not see.
Update - to Stifled by Religion
(see below). Birmingham's Repertory Theatre company has cancelled the run
of the play Behzti, the subject of violent protests by the Sikh community
who felt that it insulted their religion. The theatre company's executive
director, Stuart Rogers, refused to censor the work and has cited "health
and safety" concerns as the reason for the cancellation. According
to this
BBC report, Birmingham Councillor Chaman
Lal, a spokesman for the Sikhs, said there would have been larger protests
had the play continued. This could be interpreted as a prediction - or a
threat. He said "There are no winners or losers -
common sense has prevailed." Wrong, there is one big loser - free
speech. It has been stifled by the demonstrations of these religionists.
There is also a danger that the Sikhs' protest will lead to "me too"
demonstrations from other religions, who feel threatened by the open and
free debate that is vital to a secular, multicultural society. Councillor
Chaman Lal added insult to injury with this observation, "We
have nothing against freedom of speech, but you do not make a mockery of
someone's faith or beliefs. That is oppression." To say they have
nothing against freedom of speech has been proved to be less than honest -
they have certainly succeeded in closing a play by means of violent
protest on no other grounds than a perceived insult to their religion. It
seems that ex-Home Secretary David Blunkett's proposed law against
religious hatred is unecessary - the same unwelcome result can be achieved
by recourse to tactics that bear an unpleasant resemblance to mob rule.
The Sikh protesters have done the wider perception of their community no
favors whatsoever with their behavior and likely have set a very worrying
precedent. The word is out - violent protest gets results.
Stifled by Religion - is it now the case that any religious group
can protest at anything that causes them offence, to the point of
violence? It certainly seems so, after members of the Sikh community took
exception to a play being staged in Birmingham England. During protests 5
police officers were injured in scuffles outside the theater. The play,
Behzti (Dishonour), written by Gurpreet Bhatti, has upset Sikhs with its
depictation of sexual abuse and murder within the precincts of a temple or
gurdwara. Bhatti has herself received threats and has been advised by
police not to say anything in public. So much for artistic freedom and the
right to free speech. Mohan Singh, a local Sikh community leader
told the BBC "When
they're doing a play about a Sikh priest raping somebody inside a
gurdwara, would any religion take it?" Maybe not, but they should.
If plays and films are to be banned or censored at the behest of religious
groups, where will it end? If the play has broken a law then legal action
should be taken - if it merely insults a religion, so what? An unwelcome
end result could be censorship of any item of comment, scholarship or
entertainment that offends touchy religionists. There is a continuum that
runs from the Sikh action and that of Christian Voice (see
No Still, Small Voice) to the group that
murdered Theo van Gogh, so outraged were they by his film,
Submission. Religionists are arrogant enough to believe that
they alone are the arbiters of taste and decency, but their beliefs are
just that - beliefs, they are not rules for the conduct of others who do
not subscribe to those beliefs. Religious edicts are not universal in the
way that physical law is. To quote Caesar in Shaw's Caesar and Cleopatra " Pardon him Theodotus; he is a barbarian, and thinks
that the customs of his tribe and island are the laws of nature."
Britain is home to
170 different belief systems and catering
to the whims of all of them would not only be impossible it would also be
ignoring those who do not subscribe to religious beliefs. The NSS
Newsline has this interesting statistic -
the UK 2001 census revealed the UK has more
Jedi Knights than Sikhs - does this mean
it is no longer safe to take the piss out of Star Wars? Expect more
whining from Christian groups at Channel 4's Christmas Day documentary
called Who Wrote the Bible? It, according to this Guardian
piece, contains no more revelations about
the Bible and its characters than can be gleaned from a little honest
research (see
Sheep Turned Goat?). The evangelists who
are objecting reveal nothing more than their own abysmal ignorance about
their own religion and how it came to be. Finally, in the Observer is an
article by Richard Harries called "We
should not fear religion". Harries seems to find nothing
frightening in the resurgence of religion in the world, whether in the US
or the Middle East or outside UK theaters. His complacent and inaccurate
view is encapsulated in this daft statement "Religions
bind people together and create communities which are part of the world of
public events." Religions may bind people together, but only within
their own grouping - on a larger scale they are more divisive than any
other human construct. It is obvious if you are God's chosen people you
are excluding everyone else who does not share your beliefs. A favorite
quote from
Mark Twain sums this up far better than
80 ever could, "Man is a Religious Animal. He is the
only Religious Animal. He is the only animal that has the True Religion -
several of them. He is the only animal that loves his neighbor as himself
and cuts his throat if his theology isn't straight."
December 25th 2004
Herod the Great
- at this time of year Christians will be retelling the
Nativity fable with the familiar
characters of Jesus and family, wise men, assorted asses and donkeys and
an innkeeper, to name a few. One important participant who gets a raw deal
every time is King Herod, known to secular history as Herod the Great. (It
is doubly unfair as he is the only real historical figure in Matthew's
version of the miraculous birth story.) To a Christian Herod has only one
role, that of evil despot who committed a foul crime forever remembered as
the Massacre of the Innocents. Fearful of news that a new king was born
and looking to safeguard his throne Herod "slew all
the children that were in Bethlehem, and in all the coasts thereof, from
two years old and under..." according to
Matthew 2:16 in the New Testament. (One
wonders where was God while all this was going on?) Of the four
evangelists Matthew is the only one to mention this horrific event, which
seems odd at first, until you realize he was not writing
history as we know it. Convinced that
Jesus was the son of God, it was inconceivable to Matthew that his birth
would not be would not be attended by events signifying this. In a
deliberate echo of the massacre at Pharaoh's command which accompanied the
birth of Moses, Matthew introduced the Herod copycat crime. How can we be
certain that the massacre is not historical? We cannot, not without a time
machine, but we can be pretty sure. Herod is a real historical figure and
events in his life were chronicled outside the New Testament, by such as
Josephus, who was no fan of Herod and is unlikely to have ignored a chance
to add to his list of crimes. Mention is made of many of Herod's misdeeds,
including the murder of members of his own family, but of the innocents
there is nothing. (Emperor Augustus is reported to have said, "It
is safer to be Herod's swine than Herod's son.") A look at Herod's
career shows him to be no worse than many
other rulers of his time, and an astute politician who managed to keep on
the right side of the main superpower of the time, Rome. He was also a
great builder - the port of
Caesarea and the
temple in Jerusalem being two of his
achievements. For an historical, as opposed to a theological view of Herod
the Great listen to Terry Jones' "Let's
Hear It for the King of Judea" archived by BBC Radio 4. (Scroll
down alphabetical listing) The wonderfully named King
Herod Appreciation Society has this to say "....
we think that Monty Python's Life of Brian says at least as much that is
valid about religion as any other religious commentary you can name (and
if you can't laugh at your own religion, we ask you -- how strong is your
faith, really? Just How Lovely Are Your Tents?) As another, the received
wisdom about King Herod is that he was jealous with a distinctly murderous
streak. Less appreciated is that he had enlightened ideas about economics;
was dedicated to good works; and kept the Kingdom of the Jews alive by
adroit politics within an Empire far greater (and more cruel) than
anything he could muster. It all depends on whose version of history you
read." Part of this comment bears repeating, especially in light of
the current number of religionists squealing about insults to their faith
"... if you can't laugh at your own religion, we ask
you -- how strong is your faith, really?" Over the festive season
80 will certainly be raising a glass to Herod the Great and Brian (I am
not the Messiah) Cohen. Cheers! (For those with access to Channel 4 in the
UK look out for
The Real King Herod showing December 29th
7:00pm)
December 27th 2004
Integrated Hogwash - there are some interesting points to ponder in
this
item in the Guardian about Charles
Windsor, the Prince of Wales'
Foundation for Integrated Health. The
Foundation, set up by Windsor to press for integration of so-called
complementary and alternative health therapies into the National Health
Service, has had a Christmas windfall courtesy of the British taxpayer.
The Blair government has handed over £1 million "for
the delicate task of sorting the experts from the amateurs in alternative
medicine." Delicate is an understatement - impossible is nearer the
mark when one is dealing with treatments that meet no acceptable
scientific standards of evidence of efficacy. Michael Fox, the
foundation's chief executive spoke of the difficulties "Take
reflexology - there are courses which may not last terribly long. There
are also some very good ones that last full-time over three years. The
difference in terms of proficiency is significant." Is this
proficiency defined as the quality of having great facility and
competence? What about ascertaining whether the treatment is of any
medical use whatsoever before setting
standards for practitioners "proficiency".? A possible reason for
reflexology's popularity is suggested by
Robert
Carroll, "One reason foot massage may be
so pleasurable and is associated with significant improvement in mood is
that the area of the brain that connects to the foot is adjacent to the
area that connects to the genitals." Reflexology is
unproven nonsense and no amount of
regulation is going to change that. The article also repeats a statement
that Windsor made in the Guardian in February this year. It is as
ridiculous now as it was then. "It seems
extraordinary to me that despite a recent poll indicating that 75% of
people want complementary medicine available to all on the NHS, there are
still only a handful of clinics offering integrated healthcare for free."
Two observations here, Charlie, which you seem unable or unwilling to take
on board - firstly, medical treatments should be rated by their efficacy
in double blind testing, not by a popularity contest. Secondly, most
healthcare professionals see no reason to introduce unproven therapies
into their clinics - most of them are more than busy enough employing
medicine that actually works. (For more on the Prince's alternative
therapy promotion see
Complementary Charlie,
Taxes for Twaddle and
Whacky Windsor's Wizard Wheeze.)
Update - to
Sikh Censorship. It is now
reported that, following death threats, actor-manager Neal Foster, of the
Birmingham Stage Company, won't be going ahead with plans to stage the
play Bezhti, which was shut down in its original venue following violent
protests by offended Sikhs (see
Stifled by Religion). The author
of the play, Gurpreet Kaur Bhatti, currently in hiding following murder
threats (is this really happening in England?) also contacted Foster,
asking for the play to be abandoned. Foster is
quoted in the Guardian, "They
said I would be shot if I continued with plans to stage the play. I have
taken them seriously - but at the moment they are just phone calls, and I
am not in hiding. I am extremely sad at the continued turn of events. I
hope this will just be an isolated incident and will not be repeated."
Sadly this is likely to be repeated next time fanatical religionists, of
whatever faith, fancy themselves and their beliefs "insulted". Although
the West Midlands police have said they will deploy enough officers to
ensure the safety of the public at any new production of the play, it is a
little late for that. The original production should never have been
closed in the first place - it sends the wrong signal to those who resort
to violence. The BBC
reports another possible venue for Bezhti
could be The Royal Court Theatre in London. Harmander Singh from the
Sikhs in England
organisation told the BBC "Problems that they have
had up north will manifest themselves in London if the play is staged
here." Now is that a warning or a threat? Perhaps the Metropolitan
police will be more effective at mob control than their counterparts in
Birmingham. (Here is a
round-up of the UK press's reaction to
mob censorship - it is uniformly unfavorable.) As if things weren't ugly enough,
the
paedophile-shifting Roman Catholic
Archbishop of Westminster, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O'Connor, has jumped on
the bandwagon, "There's a balance to be kept here
between freedom which I think is rightly cherished in this country.... but
there's also some kind of self-censorship that playwrights too have to
realise that some things could be very offensive to people."
Perhaps he and his church would like to self-censor the offensive
lies they spread about the efficacy of
condoms in the fight against HIV AIDS,
their habit of adorning the outside of their buildings with graphic and
offensive representations of a man nailed to a cross and their offensive
attempts to
affect the outcome of democratic
elections by bringing pressure on voters who happen to be members of their
sect.
December 28th 2004
Asking Why
- in the UK Guardian Martin Kettle asked the
question "How
can religious people explain something like this?" with
reference to the ongoing disaster on the shorelines of the Indian Ocean.
He relates the great
Lisbon earthquake of 1755 to the rise of
the Enlightenment and the search for naturalistic explanations for such
acts of nature. Any religion that tries to explain why their god or gods
permits such seemingly random, catastrophic events that injure and kill
tens of thousands of innocent men, women and children, regardless of race
or creed is going to have its work cut out. For those without a
supernatural view of the world the question why is meaningless - as
stated below, the
surface of a planet can be a dangerous place. Here are some
responses to Kettle's article, some
offered by clergymen using the obfuscating logic of their kind to avoid
addressing the question, with observations such as, "Explanations
are based on theories, and to theorise about suffering is to degrade those
who suffer." What nonsense. Here's another "Religious
believers see the totality of experience as part of a greater narrative
moving towards an as yet unimaginable goal." There is no narrative
- the goal is unimaginable because there is no goal - just a vast and
uncaring universe against which superstition is useless - except perhaps
for illusory comfort. Another response was to go on the attack, which yet
again avoids having to explain anything, as this correspondent
demonstrates "However I don't think that Kettle is
seeking answers; rather he is trying to score points for his particular
world view. His article illustrates the emptiness of humanist atheism;
faced with this tragedy, all they can do is to project their anger and
sense of hopelessness by attacking someone else's faith system. Atheists
seem to be weak on self-knowledge or self-criticism. At least as
Christians we can go away quietly and try to light a candle rather than
curse the darkness." Atheists do not curse the darkness - and the
last thing they would do is "go away quietly and try
and light a candle...". The proper response is not to go into some
religious equivalent of a fetal crouch, but to learn how such calamitous
events come about and improve our global warning systems so that the
impact of the next disaster of this kind - and there will be a next one,
God or no God - will be lessened. One group, neither scientists or
religionists, seems to know who to blame "Technically
a tsunami is an act of God but hopefully insurers will look at the
situation sympathetically" a tourist industry representative
told the BBC. Meanwhile, oblivious to
such theological and scientific discussions, many thousands have dreadful
days and weeks ahead as they try to cope with the aftermath of the
tsunamis. You can help by making a donation to
UNICEF,
Red Cross/Crescent,
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) ,
The Institute for Humanist Studies, or see
here.
Violent Planet - The
humanitarian disaster caused by the sea
surges following a
submarine earthquake near Indonesia
illustrates how vulnerable humankind is in the face of an uncaring
universe. Planet Earth twitched, causing many thousands of deaths as the
resulting
tsunamis engulfed surrounding coastlines.
A rearrangement of
tectonic plates displaced thousands of
cubic kilometers of water, which resulted in huge waves racing across the
Indian Ocean. On a planetary scale this was not a huge event, but the
consequences for the people living on the surrounding coasts was, and is,
devastating, and can only bring home to us all what a dangerous place our
universe is, and how puny humanity is compared to the power of nature. And
yet this 'quake and the destruction and loss of life it has engendered is
tiny compared to what could happen with the eruption of a
supervolcano, such as the one below
Yellowstone in the US, or a repeat of the massive outpourings of flood
basalts that formed the
Deccan Traps in India and the
Siberian Traps. Instead of spending
obscene amounts of money on the quest for more efficient ways of killing
each other with military hardware we need to spend more on learning about
our home planet - it is the only one we have. All our eggs are in this one
planetary basket. The Earth is not a passive backdrop to the events of
human history, nor has it been specially created by a divine being to be
humanity's home, it is a seismically active planet, its outer plates
shifting and rubbing against each other as heat from the core finds its
way to the surface. This happens on such a huge and, compared to human
lifetimes, slow scale that we do not realize how dangerous an environment
the surface of a planet can be. Greater resources need to be dedicated not
only to finding out more about the Earth, but also to the setting up of an
international network to allow a
swift response to such disasters. More
research into possible
'quake detection and warning systems such
as
QuakeSat
need to be given a high priority. A global
tsunami early warning system is already
within our technological grasp, and could be set up for a fraction of the
cost of a major modern weapons system. The exploration of the Solar System
will enable the nascent discipline of
comparative planetology to become an
invaluable tool - we will learn so much more than we can from just one
example of how a planet is put together. This latest disaster has struck
many nations
ill-equipped to cope with something of this magnitude, but if a massive
eruption ocurred on a scale that we can see evidence for in the geological
record, nowhere on Earth would be safe. People in many Western nations,
the very ones that possess the technological base necessary to study the
planet and the dangers it holds for humanity are
turning away from science. There is a
worrying increase in the number of people who think that religion holds
all the answers. This is an extremely dangerous development. It is science
and a willingness to use the knowledge and advantages it confers for the
benefit of ALL humans that is our best hope - not the comforting and
irrational distractions of supernatural beliefs. In this context and with
this recent and ongoing disaster in mind it is worth repeating part of the
introduction to these pages. It is 80's contention that "we
live in a fascinating, beautiful and, let's face it, dangerous enough
universe without complicating matters with gobbledegook."
December 30th 2004
Antiquities Antics - wherever there is a demand some enterprising
individuals will supply - and if demand for the real thing far outstrips
supply prices rise and the temptation for fakery is overwhelming. This is
the case for items classified as "biblical antiquities", such as the
so-called James Ossuary and the Jehoash Tablet, both now known to be
forgeries.(see
Box of Hot Air and
Tablet of Deceit). Both items were
tainted even before suggestions of forgery were made. They had no
provenance, no documented proof of the circumstances of their discovery.
For any artifact this lack of context diminishes any archaeological value
it may have. This does not, however, seem to affect its value on the
antiquities market and it is this market that drives the efforts of
forgers. (see
here for details of how a fake artifact
can be artificially aged) Despite attempts to defend the authenticity of
the ossuary and tablet those accused of expertly forging them will now
have their
day in court. Four antiquities collectors
have been indicted by Israeli police, accused of being part of a forgery
ring that produced both items. It is expected that further indictments
will follow. The lust to own antiquities, particularly if they have a
supposed biblical connection, not only powers the forgery industry but
also encourages the pillaging of archaeological sites for profitable
items, causing untold damage. (What is happening to many
priceless sites in
chaotic Iraq is anybody's guess.) Aren
Maeir, a senior lecturer in archaeology at Bar-Ilan University, Israel
told the
New York Times (reg rqd) "It's
time to realize that collecting antiquities is destroying our
archaeological heritage and is driving a market for fraud, this is a game
where we are all losing." and archaeologist Shimon Gibson told the
Guardian " Now it
looks like we are going to have to go backward and double-check all our
facts to make sure that what we thought was real really is."
Incidentally, Gibson has featured on 80's pages before with his own
questionable "biblical archaeology" claim of having found the
cave of John the Baptist. (also see
Is Nothing Sacred? for the story of the
now-debunked Ivory Pomegranate, which was once hailed as the only
surviving remnant of Solomon's temple in Jerusalem. Look
here for a list of known forgeries)
Daley Belief - for another reaction to the tsunami disaster see
this column by Janet Daley in the UK Daily Telegraph entitled "Non-belief
rots our national heart". She tries to turn the question "How
could a loving God permit such pointless and gratuitous ruin?" into
a very shaky argument for the existence of God. Her response to those who
point out that such an appalling and indiscriminate catastrophe implies
there is no caring God is an odd one. If natural disasters argue for the
non-existence of a deity then anything positive, any "wonderful
event" ( Daley's term), such as " every cured
cancer patient, every child rescued from a fire - has to be evidence that
He does." This does not follow at all - to use her examples, an
atheist or humanist would say that the cancer patient was cured by skilful
doctors and nurses applying medical science, and the child was rescued by
brave firefighters employing modern technology. No need or room for God at
all - human ingenuity, compassion and courage is enough. Daley then spends
the rest of the piece bemoaning the lack of religious belief in modern
Britain, dismissing it as cynicism rather than true agnosticism and
linking it to what she perceives to be "the great
British Saturday night out, with its binge-drinking and its frenetic,
mindless violence..." Seeing this, she says observers "will
know that something ugly and hollow is eating away the heart of this
country." If one sees no evidence for the existence of
a loving God, not just in the wake of a great natural disaster but in
ordinary everyday life, and yet also sees a government prepared to push a
religious agenda in such areas as faith schools and which calls in
unelected religious leaders to advise on policy, if one sees religious
minorities turning to violence in the face of perceived insults, if one
sees paedophile priests shuffled between parishes, unbeknown to
congregations, cynicism is a perfectly understandable response. Daley ends
with a New Year thought on how Britain could be a happier place "if
its people were more in touch with the aspirations, and the consolations,
of a belief that life is about something more than the present moment."
This could be interpreted as a wish for a religious tranquilizer, in other
words don't deal with a harsh and dangerous world with eyes wide open,
don't promote rationality, tolerance and kindness in the face of an
uncaring universe, but seek solace in supernatural beliefs, let the sharp
edges of the world be wrapped in the cotton woolly-mindedness of a loving,
caring God. If to attain "happiness" one has to eschew a sane, rational
world view in favor of religious superstition, no matter how comforting,
it is a bad trade. What Daley fails to realize is that it is possible to
be happy and fulfilled in a godless universe with no religious crutch to
lean upon. 80 makes no apology for repeating the words of the late and
sadly missed Douglas Adams. "Isn't it enough to see
that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are
fairies at the bottom of it too?" (Thanks to Robert for pointing
out Daley's article)
* For the population of a country where "something
ugly and hollow is eating away" its heart, the British are still
capable of
surprising charities with the scale of
their donations of aid for tsunami victims. The £30 million raised by the
public so far gives the lie to Daley's bleak view of British society.
80's Recommended Reading
Links
from Number 80
©Copyright 2004
Ross W Sargent All rights reserved