Copyright Ian Pearson, BT Futurologist
Click here for contact details, other articles and personal details
January 2001
Banks will have to change dramatically from
today's traditional institutions if they want to survive in the networked
world. They are currently introducing internet banking to try to keep
customers, but the move to digital electronic cash, held perhaps by the
customer or an independent third party, will mean that the cash can be quite
separate from the transaction agent. Cash does not need to be stored in a bank
if records in secured databases anywhere can be digitally signed and
authenticated. The customer may hold it on his own computer, or in a cyberspace
vault elsewhere. With digital signatures and high network security, advanced
software will put the customer firmly in control with access to any facility or
service anywhere.
In fact, no-one need hold cash at all, or
even move it around. Cash is just bits today, already electronic records. In
the future, it will be an increasingly blurred entity, mixing credit,
reputation, information, and simply promises into exchangeable tokens. My
salary may be just a digitally signed certificate from BT yielding control of a
certain amount of credit, just another signature on a long list as the credit
migrates round the economy. The 'promise to pay the bearer' just becomes a
complex series of serial promises. Nothing particularly new here, just more of
what we already have. Any corporation or reputable individual may easily
capture the bank's role of keeping track of the credit. It is just one service
among many that may leave the bank.
As the world becomes increasingly
networked, the customer could thus retain complete control of the cash and its
use, and could buy banking services on a transaction by transaction basis. For
instance, I could employ one company to hold my cash securely and prevent its
loss or forgery, while renting the cash out to companies that want to borrow
via another company, keeping the bulk of the revenue for myself. Another
company might manage my account, arrange transfers etc, and deal with the
taxation, auditing etc. I could probably get these done on my personal
computer, but why have a dog and bark yourself.
The key is flexibility, none of these
services need be fixed any more. Banks will not compete on overall package, but
on every aspect of service. Worse still (for the banks), some of their
competitors will be just freeware agents. The whole of the finance industry
will fragment. The banks that survive will almost by definition be very
adaptable. Services will continue and be added to, but not by the rigid
structures of today. Surviving banks should be able to compete for a share of
the future market as well as anyone. They certainly have a head start in many
of the required skills, and have the advantage of customer lethargy when it
comes to changing to potentially better suppliers. Many of their customers will
still value tradition and will not wish to use the better and cheaper
facilities available on the network. So as always, it looks like there will be
a balance.
Firstly, with large numbers of customers
moving to the network for their banking services, banks must either cater for
this market or become a niche operator, perhaps specialising in tradition,
human service and even nostalgia. Most banks however will adapt well to network
existence and will either be entirely network based, or maintain a high street
presence to complement their network presence.
Facilities in high street banking will echo
this real world/cyberspace nature. It must be possible to access network
facilities from within the banks, probably including those of competitors. The
high street bank may therefore be more like shops today, selling wares from
many suppliers, but with a strongly placed own brand. There is of course a
niche for banks with no services of their own at all who just provide access to
services from other suppliers. All they offer in addition is a convenient and
pleasant place to access them, with some human assistance as appropriate.
Traditional service may sometimes be pushed
as a differentiator, and human service is bound to attract many customers too.
In an increasingly machine dominated world, actually having the right kind of
real people may be significant value add.
But many banks will be bursting with high
technology either alongside or in place of people. Video terminals to access
remote services, perhaps with translation to access foreign services. Biometric
identification based on iris scan, fingerprints etc may be used to authenticate
smart cards, passports or other legal documents before their use, or simply a
means of registering securely onto the network. High quality printers and electronic
security embedding would enable banks to offer additional facilities like
personal bank notes, usable as cash.
Of course, banks can compete in any
financial service. Because the management of financial affairs gives them a
good picture of many customer's habits and preferences, they will be able to
use this information to sell customer lists, identify market niches for new
businesses, and predict the likely success of customers proposing setting up
businesses.
As they try to stretch their brands into
new territories, one area they may be successful is in information banking.
People may use banks as the publishers of the future. Already knowledge guilds
are emerging. Ultimately, any piece of information from any source can be
marketed at very low publishing and distribution cost, making previously
unpublishable works viable. Many people have wanted to write, but have been
unable to find publishers due to the high cost of getting to market in paper. A
work may be sold on the network for just pennies, and achieve market success by
selling many more copies than could have been achieved by the high priced paper
alternative. The success of electronic encyclopedias and the demise of
Encyclopedia Britannica is evidence of this. Banks could allow people to upload
information onto the net, which they would then manage the resultant financial
transactions. If there aren't very many, the maximum loss to the bank is very
small. Of course, electronic cash and micropayment technology mean that the
bank is not necessary, but for many, it may smooth the road.
Their exposure to the detailed financial
affairs of the community put banks in a privileged position in identifying
potential markets. They could therefore act as co-ordinators for virtual
companies and co-operatives. Building on the knowledge guilds, they could
broker the skills of their many customers to existing virtual companies and
link people together to address business needs not addressed by existing
companies, or where existing companies are inadequate or inefficient. In this
way, short-term contractors, who may dominate the employment community, can be
efficiently utilised to everyone's gain. The employees win by getting more
lucrative work, their customers get more efficient services at lower cost, and
the banks laugh to themselves.