Copyright Ian Pearson,
BT Futurologist
Click here for
contact details, other articles and personal details
Why we'll all be self employed
Feb 2001
Self employment will steadily increase over
the next decade or two, and gradually become more profitable, while at the same
time becoming less stressful. The engine behind these trends is the roll-out of
e-business technology, or more specifically, e-commerce. But such tools are
mainly designed by and for large companies, so why will they benefit the
self-employed? Why will most people become self employed? Let me explain.
E-commerce is all about streamlining the
marketplace, cutting out the middle-man, putting customers directly in touch
with suppliers, and generally automating the sales and procurement process as
far as possible. In a typical large company, about a third of the employees are
connected to this marketplace process in one way or another - accountants,
auditors, sales staff, procurement executives, marketers, and armies of
clerical people. Many of the tasks in these areas will be automated in the near
future. The people who used to do these automated jobs must re-skill if they
want to continue working. Fortunately, each new wave of technology creates lots
of new jobs as well as eradicating old ones, but for many people, re-skilling
will be a chore. Technological change is accelerating and will do so for
decades to come. We will simply have to get used to it. Other areas of
e-business follow similar trends.
Most successful companies recognise the
acceleration of change, and want to be nimble so that they can react fast
enough. They do not want large numbers of permanent staff, particularly in
administrative and support roles. The days of large departments will soon be
over. As an example, BT has over 100,000 employees but no personnel department
- the personnel department has been outsourced to a company that also provides
it for many other companies. They will automate as far as possible those
functions that are common to each client company.
If I were to set up a company tomorrow, it
would have no personnel, accountancy, or legal departments. I would have a very
small core of key people who define the very nature of the company and who are
the source of its competitive edge. I would back them up with as much machine
intelligence as I could. Everything else I would try to outsource. My company
might effectively be quite large in overall ability and population, but most of
the staff would be bought in on demand, just for a particular task or project.
On a mature internet, it will be easy to do this, since other companies will
capitalise on this market by providing world-class support functions on
request. An entrepreneur with a good idea will be able to grow extremely
rapidly in such an environment.
My company would be mostly virtual. And
here lies the key point. These other support companies will be virtual too. The
majority of people in this environment would effectively be self employed,
selling themselves project by project to whomsoever offers the most fun or the
highest reward. Even the personnel company only employs a minimum of full time
core staff, while it perfects its automation software. My company benefits by
virtuality, the employees benefit because I have to pay them more to ensure I
get the people I need. And because we will make extensive use of high level
machine intelligence, together we can create a great deal more, to mutual
advantage. This is the logic behind phase one of the virtual company. It's
already happening. Let's hope it works.
Machine intelligence is the fuel in this
e-business engine. And it is getting better each day. Machine intelligence
itself can be seen in two quite different ways. It de-skills jobs by allowing
more junior people to do them, assisted by smart machines. But from another
point of view, it upskills people, allowing them to do more difficult tasks.
The first of these viewpoints is far more common, but is less useful. Assuming
a deskilling of jobs, but keeping everything else constant, would yield the
undesirable consequence of gradual wealth reduction. . If we assume that
everyone still wants to work, and that they are made capable of higher grades
of work by virtue of machine assistance, then the economy as a whole benefits.
On average, we're better off. A much more attractive viewpoint, enabled by
there being no fundamental caps on the economy, at least in the short term.
As this machine intelligence improves, it will
gradually take over more and more tasks, requiring fewer people in each role.
New technologies make new markets, so more new roles. But as the economy
continues to expand, we will notice a new phase of virtuality. The next wave of
automation will primarily affect management and professional grades in
companies. Eventually, we will get to the point where our business environment
is so smart that it automatically identifies market niches and opportunities,
and automatically negotiates with individuals' software agents to fill those
niches and exploit those opportunities. We'll all have software agents by then
to advertise our skills, assets and availability. This second phase of
virtuality will be dominated by virtual co-operatives, groups of free-lancers
working together in competition with older virtual companies. Virtual co-ops
will be administrated mainly by software. With no shareholders or management
overheads to pay, and computer-speed co-ordination, they will usually win when
competing against virtual companies, who themselves are much more efficient
than industrial age companies.
So the future of self employment looks good
so far.
Personnel, Training and records
At this point I got bored. One day I may
finish this. Sorry!