Pompous D'Arse's Examples of Real Emails
(for people in olden times)

Welcome to D’Arse’s pompous guide to why these pages were wrote and stuff, and some missives thereon.

This relativity site was assembled many years ago during a long but nonetheless pleasurable winter. From its creation and without precipitant warning electric mails of gentle appreciation began to arrive at a pace to move all but those given to lesser sensitivity.

Indeed, many such epistles warmed the cockles of the heart on such motionless and frigid evenings, and to most comfortable and snuggleful levels.


Mrs D'Arse spots The Truth and D'Arse becomes somewhat melancholy

But, unhappily and sad to say, on occasion those very same cockles have been turned a most wretched shade of blue after being enveloped by foul, strong and unpleasant winds. Let none of us be fooled; these are the winds of the uppercase and the excessive exclamation mark!! These same foul winds speak from the heart so strongly, and yet trumpet so noisily as if a strong guff in a small tent.


To avoid The Truth D'Arse faces the other way, and cheers up no end

Suffice to say that, alas, many of the received missives cannot be republished here. For I fear that publication of such foul and depraved communiqués would cause many a gentle and sweet lady to be overcome with a fit of the vapours. Of the remainder it is possible to list but a small selection of the unsolicited, but perhaps instructive contributions to Man’s unquenchable thirst for knowledge...

 

 

Name and email address withheld (subject title of email):

EINSTIEN WAS WRONG!!!!!!

D’Arse replies: I have no idea who Einstien is, and as the rest of the email was in Greek I never did find out what he was wrong about. It seemed jolly important so I hope it was all sorted out in the end.

Name and email address withheld (copied from email):

E = MC2 is wrong!!! As any one on a diat will tell u Bacon has more calories thayt Apples!!

D’Arse replies: Bloody hell, you’re onto something here! If only they used bacon instead of apples in nuclear power stations. But wait! Isn’t that what Mr Burns WANTS you to think?!

Name and email address withheld (copied from email):

… and we are all being controlled by cosine waves… …government plot…

D’Arse replies: Rubbish, I say! We are being controlled by an invisible skiing holiday...  …vegetable plot…


To avoid Them the good doctor takes two pulses. Only then can he be sure of The Truth. (Or can he? Always make sure your doctor takes THREE pulses and Keeps An Open Mind!!!)

 

Name and email address withheld (copied from email):

As ANY optical sientist will tell you red light travells faster than blue.

D’Arse replies: But, I’m sure we agree, blue is saaad. Just think about that for a second. Yeah, saaad. Don’t you go slower when you are feeling sad? I bet you do. But hey! Blue light not only has the same velocity as red light but actually has more energy, so let’s all clap! Yay!!

 

(Not real) Name: Rod Ball (copied from a very long list of tedious emails):

You completely trust what you perceive as the accumulated opinion of those who have written before you... you seem to wish to blur with something of the indignance of a religious zealot confronted with heresy !

Your attitude is lamentably not untypical...

[after I offered him marriage]
...y
our apparent derangement has become acute...
[and yet he still continued to write back...]

I could reply that I am in contact with two physicists who actually work at CERN…

D’Arse replies: What sort of contact? Are you telling them it’s deep, deep lurve, you cunning old scoundrel you?! Damn all of the experimental results to hell!! Oh Rod, rip my jodhpurs and spats off and tell me YOUR opinion!

Afterwards we can discuss how others tired of you and your aggression, such as here. Oh and here. And here.


At New Year open the window of Fact. Yeah, really go for it!

 

Name and email address withheld (copied from email):

 

SCIENCE FRAUD
 
The progress in all science disciplines, except one, is based on the philosophy of logic. Logic or in laymen’s words ordinary common sense determines whether theoretical conclusions are considered valid or not.
 
The only science that excludes itself is Theoretical Physics. The argument of theoretical physicists for this exclusion is always the non-argument that their insights are too specialized and too difficult to be explained and understood by laymen.
 
Scientists, even theoretical physicists, are ordinary people who at first consider their own interest. They cheat, lie and commit science fraud to hide their incompetence. How dare I say such bold and offending accusations?
 
The unbelievable fairytale of relativity of time and space, parallel worlds and much more other crap is already disqualified for a long time. NASA withholds information that disproves Einstein’s Relativity Theory. Quantum Mechanic scientists teach and receive research funds knowing it is pseudo-science.
 
A couple of really stupid and simple mistakes set Theoretical Physicists of in the wrong direction. When discovered it was too late. Vanity withholds them to reveal their incompetence. They have had ample opportunity to correct their mistakes.
 
It is time to expose this to the public. Physics can be understood by everyone. Actually the basic of physics is very simple; just ordinary common sense. Only the self-proclaimed geniuses who say they understand their own fairytale have a problem with the simple truth: [link withheld]
 
Please fore ward this email to everyone who wants to know the arguments. It is time this science gives answers to questions they systematically ignore.
 
Sincerely,
 
[Name withheld]

 

I responded to the above email and received greater enlightenment:

 

Sorry it took some time to answer your email, but of the 7.000 persons I mailed...

My email "Science Fraud" was a "Bom". In September 2008 I will launch a "Rocket". When that won't work a planned a "Nuke" in December. It will devastate Theoretical Physics. I never planned to, but when it happens they only can blame themselves. They had plenty of chances to correct their mistakes, but apparently that is very hard.

 

D’Arse replies: Hmm... A key sentence from the mail seems to be "Only the self-proclaimed geniuses who say they understand their own fairytale have a problem with the simple truth".

 

He has a point. I'm not a genius so my fairytale has a castle in it and a princess, but I can't for the life of me figure out where the top-hatted, cane-twirling singing gerbil comes into things.

 

Let's hope the "Nuke" relies on common sense rather than theoretical physics.

 


In this disturbing picture three young women have been glued to a rope and pounded with aftershave and enigmatic music. The reason has never been made clear

 

 

Name and email address withheld (copied from an email entitled Common idiots):

 

Time is not a structure like space-to allow jumping from space-to-time -back- to space Hollywood back to the future games
 E=1/2 mc(squared) by newton because E=1/2mv(squared) v=c
Einstein doubled the value based on "Junk" experimentation and "reel" discovery'.
When Money spent and "reuslts" Expected and "No" discovery; Physicicsts rigged experiments to loot goverment grants.
Like what happened in France in October about the super collider experiments based on special theory of relativity that took 12 years to build and 20 billions cost and 20 more billions donations and lasted less than 1/2 second. What happened there?
Relativity is for common truth used for common idiots 
E=mc(squared) is optical illusions of 1/2mc(squared) you see in labs a light ray shifting and that proves that E=mc(squared) but it is an illusion. scientists trained public and goverment to be sheep. If you know differential equations and newtons law I can e-mail you how all of relativity theory and quantum mechanics are optical illusions

D’Arse replies: My God! When you you put it like that it all seems so clear!


Under threat of flatulence the scullery maid is forced to deface The Facts. It is only in this way that NASA can keep people from knowing The Truth

 

Return to the Einstein was Wrong home page

 

© Jim Doyle
Creation Date: 28 Dec 08
Last updated: 1 Jan 09

j.k.doyle@talk21.com