| |
 |
|
| Client |
Dr Ken and Seana
Shuttleworth, Jo (boy) age 7, Jaime (girl) age 4
[at that time 1997]
|
| Brief |
“It must be warm in winter, but not get too hot in summer.
Reasonable energy bills are very important and it has to
be environmentally friendly and low maintenance. It needs to have
the potential for installing solar panels, rainwater storage and
so on, when they are economically viable.
"It has
to be ‘low tech’ without complex control. It must not leak, or be
subject to flooding. All plumbing and wiring has to be accessible, not buried in
walls or floors. It
also needs areas that are accessible to wheelchair
users.
"All
walls are to be white. The building has to feel totally ‘of’ its
location. We are suspicious
of modern boxes dumped on unsuspecting landscapes. It should have
a generous hall and front door and a large fireplace as a focal
point. It should be bathed in light.
The overall feel
should be spacious and airy, yet utilitarian and functional.
It should not be lavish, profligate
or precious. It has
to be built for £345,000 and finished for Christmas lunch 1997”
.
|
| Context |
Wiltshire
is a unique county of unspoiled, wild landscapes, rolling downs
and ancient woodland. It
has a most fascinating archeological heritage including the enigmatic
stone circle monuments of Stonehenge
and Avebury, as well as Old Sarum, Silbury Hill and many
other ancient, mysterious earthworks; burial chambers of early civilization.
The whole county is rich in such features which evoke
immense visual and spiritual power
|
| The
Site |
The
five acre site, Winterbrook, is located on the edge of the Marlborough
Downs, an area of outstanding natural beauty, in the heart of Wiltshire.
A road runs along the north west edge of the site beyond
a shelterbelt of trees. Over
the road to the north and west is a rubbish tip, recycling facility,
concrete works, sewage plant and social club.
A housing estate lies to the west beyond the immediate neighbouring
houses. Therefore the best views are to the south and east to the
White Horse and Downs. The strongest winds come from the west and
northwest. The land
originally was part of a farm, which later became used as playing
fields during the Second World War. It was then returned to sheep
grazing until 1994.
The site consisted of a house, a scattering of ram shackle outbuildings
and farmland. The existing
house was poorly built, out of rendered blockwork, in 1926 and subsequently
converted into two flats during the war for military use. It was
converted back into single usage in 1962.
It had woodworm, was thermally inefficient, and had only
a few views to the garden. During the demolition it was found to have no foundations.
Needless to say it had little architectural merit.
Across the road a RAF camp housed over 3,000 men during the
war, the only remains of which was a doctor’s surgery hut built
on the Winterbrook land.
It is hard to envisage, but the hut was actually lived in
as
late as the 1960s. It was demolished as part of The Crescent House
project.
|
| Landscape |
The landscape concept
evolved from a study of Wiltshire’s heritage and a philosophy of
landscaping which is simple and calm. The emphasis is on the scale
of the Wiltshire landscape rather than importing a multitude of
styles and suburban herbaceous borders.
The concept consists merely of meadow land, trees and spring
bulbs to express the changing seasons.
The first part of the landscape design is a simple one; a 100 metre
diameter circle of 100 maple trees forming a continuous edge to
a new planted woodland of over 1000 English broadleaf trees.
The circle contains a wild flower hay meadow of species indigenous
to Wiltshire. At the
edge is a mown grass walk, offering changing views of the Marlborough
Downs, the White Horse and ancient earthwork.
The circle, like Avebury, Stonehenge and Old Sarum is a strong
architectural form. It forms a continuously curving route which
links the various areas of the garden, including the orchard, the
meadow, the bonfire circle and compost heap.
This is in strong contrast to an absolutely straight woodland path,
which takes you through a narrow belt of existing mature woodland,
parallel to the brook, which only flows in winter.
A line of mature evergreen trees provides the third element, cutting
across the circle and contrasting with the deciduous circle.
The final part is a small tump rising out of the flatness of the
meadow. It is built
from the demolition material of the previous house, and echoes the
ancient earthworks of Wiltshire.
The Crescent House is pushed tightly into the north west
corner of the site to maximise the longest views, on the diagonal,
across the site. This
reduces the area for cars to a minimum so as to
preserve as much of
the land for nature as possible.
|
| Concept
|
The
Crescent House is modest and austere.
Its simple form reacts strongly with the location, reflecting
the various contrasts of the site, as well as the historical context.
The critical ingredients are: a variety of spaces related
to their function; a response to the changing quality of natural
light; sensory contact with nature and the changing seasons.
The
concept is not a modern box artificially placed in a landscape,
but is rooted strongly in its site.
It is a series of simple forms made of white finished concrete
and clear glass. Internally
they create different types of space related to the type of activity.
The design concept has two distinct, strongly contrasting sides.
To the north west (where the house is next to the adjacent
houses, the road and poorer views) it presents a solid lower, and
a higher translucent, convex wall which metaphorically rejects the
neighbouring buildings, increases privacy, reduces the effects of
the westerly winds and contains all the private spaces.
The southeast, with good views and the sun, is exactly the
opposite; a concave crescent of clear glass. Containing the living
spaces it reaches out to embrace the landscape and capture the garden
and the views, offering maximum contact with nature.
Between the two crescents is a double height gallery and circulation
space.
|
| Approach |
In this, the normal
approach to a country house of long drives with the house isolated
in the middle of its land has been rejected.
The house is tight in one corner giving maximum car-free
garden space. You are
squeezed through a gate; a glance to the left and right reveals
the woodland strip and views the entire length of the site.
Crossover the winter brook; in front, the chimney, like a
marker, rises over a long convex, horizontal white wall which leads
you to the right, into a gravel court. The long convex crescent
wall heightens the sense of arrival and the anticipation of the
entrance. A straight
wall of hanging vegetation deflects the visitor, as he is led round
to a view of the garden - where is the house?
The position of the front door is deliberately obscure. You
pivot round from the garden and walk back towards a wide, low front
door, which accentuates the double height of the curving gallery beyond.
|
| North West Crescent |
All private spaces are contained in the fortress-like thickness of the
solid convex crescent wall which, like a wraparound shield, deflects
the prevailing winds, rain and the hottest effects of the sun. It
is a hard solid form offering maximum protection and privacy.
The convex form rejects poorer environments to the north
and west. The bedrooms,
bathrooms and changing rooms are smaller contemplative spaces without
windows, naturally lit only from the top.
The relationship with nature, while lying in bed, is focused
on the sky, sunlight, stars and the sound of the rain.
These private spaces are small and low and give a strong
sense of intimacy, security, serenity and protection.
The adjacent bathrooms are simple and austere using
raw concrete troughs for washing and bathing.
|
| South East Crescent |
The southeast crescent is concave glass and reaches out literally to embrace
the garden with open arms.
It wraps around the landscape pulling it directly into the
house; diffusing the barrier between inside and outside. This crescent is the Garden room, a single volume 36m across and 3.4m
high. It incorporates all the daily family activities of cooking,
eating, relaxing and playing. It is the social focus of the whole
house and there are no divisions between the activities.
Its full height concave transparent glass wall, over 4m high,
bathes the room in natural light.
The relationship between living and nature is direct and
focused. The orientation to the south, southeast collects the welcoming
early morning sun whilst providing a view of the hotter afternoon
sun on the garden’s trees. The curve of the glass wall is sealed
to ensure movement to the landscape is around it, to experience the form of the crescent.
|
| Gallery |
The
double height gallery space gently curves on plan and provides a
transition space between the private spaces and the garden room.
The gallery contains the main entry and exit to the outside
and all internal circulation. Moving along the gallery the width
reduces, squeezing the route until, at the fireplace, it explodes
out into the vast horizontal space of the garden room.
The fireplace, of monumental proportions, is the focal point
of the gallery, and the heart and pivotal point of all the circulation
of the house. At high level, an upper gallery contains storage with
oblique views of the lower gallery and garden room.
It is lit by translucent clearstory glazing, which sparkles
in the sun. The 5.4m wall
height displays works of art produced by the children.
|
| Energy |
The
house has been designed to be sensitive to the environment.
Over 1000 deciduous trees have been planted.
Those adjacent to the house are used to reduce the chilling
effects of the wind and their leaves act as shading in summer but
allow sunlight through in winter.
The concrete structure with masonry infill provides a very
high thermal capacity, which acts as a heat store and reduces the
rate of temperature change. The whole structure is externally wrapped in 100mm of CFC-free
insulation to the walls, and 200mm to the roof, giving the building
a very high insulation value. This minimizes heating bills, CO2 emissions and allows the building to remain cool in summer.
After careful studies, the optimum orientation of the house directed the
large glazed wall to the south, southeast.
This was evolved to give maximum benefit from, and enjoyment
of, sunlight and passive solar gain, without overheating in summer.
The first dawn rays quickly heat up the house and, as the
sun moves around into the hottest time of the day, the house presents
its solid and translucent faces, when the late afternoon sun is
collected in the gallery.
The house is fully naturally cross- ventilated and generously
day lit. The chimney
acts as an integral part of the natural ventilation system in summer
as a passive stack.
The decision to use concrete was aided by the presence of a concrete
plant directly across the road from the site.
Minimal transportation was therefore involved and maximum
use of local resources. In
addition, recycled fill material below the slabs and secondhand
timber from the old demolished house for the concrete formwork shuttering
was used extensively. Also
demolishing the numerous outbuildings, consolidating the dwelling
into a single building and an adjacent shed, in one corner of the
site, returned the maximum amount of land back to nature. The SAP
rating is 85 with U values for the roof of 0.2 W/m2K and 0.3 W/m2K
for the walls and 1.8
W/m2K for the glazing. The annual energy consumption of 105Wh/m2K.
The building systems are designed to receive photovoltaic solar
panels, rainwater storage and use of an adjacent well for water
supply. After extensive
studies, none of these are viable at present but it will be simply
a matter of time before the connections are made.
|
| Materials |
The
sparse interiors are kept bare and painted white.
The ‘quality’ of fittings is less than a normal ‘semi’ -
all profligate elements that are usually found in architect designed
houses are simply left out. They are not relevant to the concept.
The concentration of ‘quality’ is in the space itself and
the relationship to light.
The decision was that the fixed budget would be better spent
on the spatial
aspects of the building, rather than on designer taps and frills.
|
| Lighting |
The
quality of changing natural daylight has been a major driving force
in formulating the design and was evolved through large study models.
The bedrooms and bathrooms are totally top lit by a long
slot against the curved northwest wall - lighting up the wall opposite
from the entrance to each room. The gallery lighting is from a continuous
translucent clerestory window.
The full height glass wall lights the garden room.
This is combined with a restrained lighting scheme, which
illuminates the back wall of the garden room, accentuating the curve.
All artificial light in the gallery and bedrooms
comes from the glazed areas so that artificial lighting echo’s
the natural lighting.
|
| Colour |
The house is white
- It reflects the traditional whitewashed walls of Wiltshire buildings.
The building’s continuous white curves create and accentuate the
spaces, modeling the building and signaling the times of the day
and seasons of the year. All surfaces of the building are white
except the chimney and end shear walls-the prime structural elements,
which are left as raw concrete.
The floor is grey carpet. Colour is added by the loose items
that are changed every season.
The colours chosen are strong colours to react to the seasons,
red for winter , yellow for spring, blue for summer and as a contrast
Autumn is monochrome. Towels,
cushions, bed linen, tablecloths, tablemats, vases, etc are faithfully
changed at the end of each season.
Only one colour is introduced at a time so the theme runs
through the whole house.
|
| Artwork |
Artwork in the Gallery
is mainly by the children. Also paintings by Jenni Newman and Rose
Shorrock,
The main Triptych in the Garden room is by Jenni Newman
|
| Dimensions |
Area 400m2. Glass
wall 24m long. Overall length of garden side crescent 36m. Ceiling
heights; Garden
room 3.4m, Bedrooms 2.3 and Gallery 4.8m.
|
| Contract |
The project was negotiated
against a fixed detailed elemental cost plan with Dove Brothers,
a subsidiary of the O’Rourke Group.
The design was evolved over a six-month period between the
design team and the contractor and all co-ordinated drawings were
issued before work commenced on site.
There were only a few minor variations during construction.
All the specialist subcontractors were negotiated on a similar,
successful basis with thedesign being prepared directly with the
subcontractors
|
| Contractors |
Main contractors
|
DoveBrothers
Ltd |
|
| |
Concrete
|
O’Rourke
Group |
|
| |
M&E
|
Drake &
Scull |
|
| |
Glass wall
|
MAG
|
|
| |
Rooflights
|
Vitral/Laird
Cross |
|
| |
Clerestory
glazing |
Reglit
|
|
| |
External
wall |
CCS Scotseal
|
|
| |
Roof
|
Fenland
|
|
| |
Fireplace
|
A W Knight
|
|
|
Metalwork |
Nic Greening
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Programme
|
Property
Purchased |
March 1994 |
|
| |
Concept
Design |
June 1994
to December 1995 |
|
| |
Planning
Application |
January
1996 |
|
| |
Planning
Permission |
June 1996
|
|
| |
Start of
Negotiations with Dove Brothers |
July 1996
|
|
| |
Start on
Site |
March 1997
|
|
|
Completion
|
December
1997 |
|
| |
|
|
|
| Consultants
|
Structural
Engineers |
Ove Arup
and Partners |
Tony
Fitzpatrick
Adrian Falconer |
| |
Services
Engineers
|
Roger Preston
and Partners |
Trevor
Farnfield
Kevin Reed
Chris Munn |
| |
Quantity
Surveyor |
Davis Langdon
and Everest |
Paul
Morrell
Erland Rendell |
|
Construction |
Dove
Brothers |
Ray O'rourke
Andy Holt
|
| |
|