Main page and contacts
Main page for Time and Aspect
Martin H. Prior * Formalisation of Aspect: Further Work
36th Linguistic Colloquium, University of Ljubljana, 12th-14th September, 2001
Towards a 'Differential Predicate Calculus'?
| This page provides the Abstract for the above paper and an adaptation of the associated handout for the web. It further links (here and elsewhere) to a general bibliography on Time and Aspect. The paper will eventually be published in Proceedings of the 36th Linguistic Colloquium, held at the Faculty of Philosophy, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, 12th-14th September, 2001. |
Colloquium Site |
| ABSTRACT In a paper given two years ago to the 34th Linguistic Colloquium at Mainz on the The Formal Representation of Aspect, I outlined a model adapting Davidson's Theory of Action to Priorean Tense Logic. My adaptation of the Davidsonian model separated out actions and processes where the process separated out a change or continuation in the state of an object. Thus we might have
P dt($ Q) (Arriving(Q) Ù Object (Q, x))
'x arrived at time dt'
Now I used dt and dt to capture points of time and intervals of time respectively, and I would like to extend the use of d/d to actions and processes themselves. Thus the above formula for 'x arrived' might become
P dt($ f) (Arriving(f) Ù df(x))
Here we capture change over time, relating df and dt, a little like df/dt. In this paper I would like to look more closely at the properties of d and d with respect to both time references and actions and processes. It is this model I shall presume to call 'Differential Predicate Calculus'.
|
0.
The following formula re-caps the representation of the simple past from previous work.
P du ($ Q) (H d u* ($ A) (P* Agent(x, A) Ù Kicking(A,Q))
Ù [Telic Operator] Compl
Object (Q, y)
Ù Through (Q, z)))
x kicked the
ball (y) through the goal-posts (z)
(qv. Tense operators)
1a. du =
~u Ù F +0 u 1b. cu
= u Ù
P -0 ~u
|
Numeric uses y = f(x) y + d y = f(x +d x)
y - g y = f(x -g x)
|
|
Uses conjectured for logical form
|
2a. d u
É du0 Ú du1 |
3a. g u
É cu1 Ú cu0 |
4.
|
|
d, d |
|
g , c |
|
(1) |
dp É d p |
|
cp É g p |
|
(2) |
d p É ~ p |
|
cp É p |
|
(3) |
g p É cp Ú d p (or just p Ú d p ?) |
||
|
(4) |
(d p Ù d q) É d (p Ù q)
but not necessarily |
|
(c p Ù c q) É c (p Ù q)
but not necessarily |
|
(5) |
d (p Ù q) É (d p Ú d q) |
|
g (p Ù q) É (g p Ú g q) |
|
(6) |
d (p Ú q) É (d p Ú d q) |
|
g (p Ú q) É (g p Ú g q) |
|
(7) |
(d p Ù d q) É d (p Ú q) |
|
(g p Ùg q) É g (p Ú q) |
|
(8) |
p É d q É d (p É q) |
|
p É g q É g (p Ù q) Ú g ~ p |
|
(9) |
d (p É q) É d (p Ù q) Ú d ~ p |
|
g (p É q) É g (p Ù q) Ú g ~ p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and what about |
|
|
|
(10) |
d (p Ù q) É (d p Ú (p Ù~d ~p)) |
|
g (p Ú q) É (g p Ú (p Ù~g ~p)) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Comparison of delta and gamma | |
Thumb-nail of above...
|
Click thumb-nail for draft entailments for gamma...![]() |
| This version 13:51 07/04/05 |