WHAT THE BLAIR SEPTEMBER DOSSIER ACTUALLY SAID
"What I believe
the assessed intelligence has established beyond doubt is
that Saddam has continued to produce chemical and biological weapons, that he continues in his efforts to develop nuclear weapons.... I am in
no doubt that the threat is serious and current....the document discloses that his
military planning allows for some of the WMD to be ready within 45 minutes of an order to
use them.... The threat posed to international peace and security, when WMD are in the hands of a brutal and aggressive regime like
Saddams, is real.... We must ensure that he does not get to use the weapons he has...."
Foreward by the Prime Minister,
The Right Honourable Tony Blair MP
IRAQS WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION THE
ASSESSMENT OF THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT
September 2002
"This chapter
sets out what we know of Saddam Husseins chemical,
biological, nuclear and ballistic missile programmes, drawing on all the available
evidence. While it takes account of the results from UN inspections and other publicly
available information, it also draws heavily on the latest
intelligence about Iraqi efforts to develop their programmes and capabilities since 1998. The main conclusions [include] that....
Iraq has a useable chemical and
biological weapons capability, in breach of UNSCR 687, which
has included recent production of chemical and biological
agents... Iraq continues to work on developing nuclear weapons, in breach of its
obligations under the Non-Proliferation Treaty and in breach of UNSCR 687. Uranium has been sought from Africa that has no civil nuclear
application in Iraq... Iraqs military
forces are able to use chemical and biological weapons, with command, control and logistical arrangements in
place. The Iraqi military are able to deploy these weapons within 45 minutes of a decision to do so...."
IRAQS WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION THE ASSESSMENT OF THE BRITISH GOVERNMENT
(Blair's 'September Dossier' 2002)
Click here to download September dossier
"In
contradiction to Dr Kelly, the government's leading expert with access to the underlying
intelligence, the foreword to the document comprises an unqualified assertion by the Prime Minister that at the
time of the production of the September dossier Saddam Hussein had chemical and biological
weapons. This was stated to be 'beyond doubt' based on 'assessed intelligence'. The Prime
Minister was certain, whilst the country's leading expert had 'no
idea'. On the basis of this dossier, and the
follow-on one in February - itself based in large part on material copied from a ten year
old student thesis - Members of Parliament voted for war.... Would MPs have voted for war
had they known that the government's leading expert... considered the only current risk to
be a 30 per cent chance that Iraq had chemical weapons. And would they have voted for war
had they realised that the principal documents submitted to the UN as evidence of Iraq's
nuclear ambitions were exposed as forgeries barely 10 days earlier?....."
Iraqgate 2003
'Fight Smart', Special Report, October 2003
'Fight Smart' Special Report
David Kelly and Scott
Ritter Contents |
|
Not
enough time to read the full 100 plus page report? |
"President Bush, asked about the Niger
issue at a news conference during his visit to South Africa, did not answer directly but
said that he was 'certain that Saddam Hussein had a weapons of mass destruction
programme'. Like Mr Blair, he has dropped the assertion that
Iraq actually had weapons. Both now say that it had a
'programme.' "
Did Iraq try to get African uranium?
BBC Online 9 July
| Background Media Links For This 'Fight Smart' Report |
| CIA challenged reliability of Blair September dossier before it was published |
| What the Blair September dossier actually said |
| The lies are leaking |
| The Italian connection |
| Right wing think tanks that pushed unknowing US public into war for oil |
| Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and Perle at the heart of this agenda |
| British complicity - 'Operation Rockingham' |
| 'Dark Actors' - The death of Dr Kelly and what he knew |
| Why Britain has gone along with all of this |
| How the media let humanity down - The General Kamel episode and other deceptions the press ignored before the war |
"There is
no longer any serious doubt that Bush administration officials deceived us into war. The
key question now is why so many influential people are in denial, unwilling to admit the
obvious.... even people who aren't partisan Republicans shy away from confronting
the administration's dishonest case for war, because they don't want to face the
implications."
Denial and Deception
New York Times, 24 June 2003
Including
A Vision For Transforming America - 24 March 2003
This Is Our Prime Minister - 23 Feb 2003
What Is Happening To Britain
And America? - 9 Feb 2003
The 911 Omar Sheikh Files - 2 Jan
2003
'October Surprise 2002' - Life After The US Constitutional Coup - 31 Oct 2002
What Did Britain Know About 911? - 28 Aug 2002
Why Did Bush Not Act On Sept 11? - 9 May 2002
World Peace Offered From Hiroshima - 22 April 2002
Did Sept 11 victims die for Enron? - 8 March 2002
CIA provided funds to financiers of Sept 11 bomber - 18
Nov 2001
NATURAL LAW PARTY WESSEX
nlpwessex@btinternet.com
www.btinternet.com/~nlpwessex