Hamilton and Iran-Contra
"......former
Congressman Lee Hamilton, chairman of the House select
committee investigating the Iran-contra affair, was shown ample
evidence against Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush, but he did
not probe their wrongdoing. Why did Hamilton choose not to
investigate? In a late 1980s interview aired on PBS 'Frontline,'
Hamilton said that he did not think it would have been 'good for
the country' to put the public through another impeachment trial.
In Lee Hamilton's view, it was better to keep the public in the
dark than to bring to light another Watergate, with all the
implied ramifications. When Hamilton was chairman of the House
committee investigating Iran-contra, he took the word of senior
Reagan administration officials when they claimed Bush and Reagan
were 'out of the loop.' Independent counsel Lawrence Walsh and
White House records later proved that Reagan and Bush had been
very much in the loop. If Hamilton had looked into the matter
instead of accepting the Reagan administration's word, the
congressional investigation would have shown the public the
truth. Hamilton later said he should not have believed the Reagan
officials. However, today, George W. Bush is considering appointing Hamilton
UN ambassador."
Uncovering the Florida
cover-up: The good fight continues
A Past Look, 25 December, 2000
"One of the key congressional
Republicans fighting this rear-guard action was Rep. Dick
Cheney
of Wyoming, who became the ranking House Republican on the Iran-contra investigation. Cheney already enjoyed a favorable
reputation in Washington as a steady conservative hand. Cheney smartly exploited his
relationship with Rep. Lee Hamilton, D-Ind., who was chairman
of the Iran-contra panel. Hamilton cared
deeply about his reputation for bipartisanship and the
Republicans quickly exploited this fact. A senior committee
source said one of Cheneys top priorities was
to block Democrats from deposing Vice President Bush about his Iran-contra knowledge. Cheney 'kept trying to intimidate
Hamilton,' the source said. 'He kept saying if we go down that
road, we wont have bipartisanship.' So, Hamilton gave Bush a
pass.
The limited investigation also gave little attention to other
sensitive areas, such as contra-drug
trafficking and the public diplomacy operation. They
were pared down or tossed out altogether. Despite surrendering to
Cheneys demands time and
again, Hamilton
failed,
in the end, to get a single House Republican to sign the final
report. Only three moderate Republicans on the Senate side
Warren Rudman, William Cohen and Paul Trible agreed to
sign the report, after extracting more concessions. Cheney and the other Republicans
submitted a minority
report
that denied that any significant wrongdoing had occurred."
Covering Up Iran-Contra -
Robert Parry
Consortium News, 5 November 2000
Robert Parry is an
investigative reporter who broke many of the Iran-contra stories
for The Associated Press and Newsweek
"[November 13, 1987] The designated congressional
committees filed their joint report on the Iran-Contra affair.
Wyoming Representative Richard Cheney, the senior Republican
member of the House Select Committee to Investigate Covert Arms Transactions
with Iran,
helped steer the joint committees to an impotent result. George Bush was totally
exonerated, and was hardly mentioned. George Bush, when
President, rewarded Dick Cheney by appointing him U.S.
Secretary of Defense, after the Senate refused to confirm John
Tower."
Chapter -XVIII- Iran- Contra
'George
Bush: The Unauthorized Biography'
by Webster G. Tarpley & Anton Chaitkin
Bush and the
Iran-Contra arms and drugs scandal - click here
Bush, Harken, BCCI and the Contras - click here
Bush, Harken, BCCI and Bin Laden - click here
Drugs And The Bogus 'War Against Terrorism'
"Around
the same time as the destruction of the Project X records,
President Bush was completing the long-running cover-up of the Iran-contra scandal. On Christmas Eve 1992, he
issued pardons to former Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger and
five other Iran-contra defendants. The pardons effectively ended
the Iran-contra investigation and spared leading
Republicans, including Gen. Colin Powell, the embarrassment of
having to testify at the Weinberger trial about their earlier
deceptions. After leaving office, Bush himself refused to submit
to an interview with Walsh that might have established what Bush
and his aides actually did during the Iran-contra
operation."
Covering Up Iran-Contra -
Robert Parry
Consortium News, 5 November 2000
Robert Parry is an
investigative reporter who broke many of the Iran-contra stories
for The Associated Press and Newsweek
"In
a remarkable new book, Firewall: The Iran-Contra Conspiracy and
Cover-up, [Judge Lawrence] Walsh [special prosecutor in charge of the complex
investigation into President Reagan's foreign policy
mis-adventures] details his six-year battle to break through the
'firewall' that White House officials built around President
Reagan and Vice President Bush after the Iran-contra scandal
exploded in November 1986. For Walsh, a lifelong Republican who
shared the foreign policy views of the Reagan administration, the
Iran-contra experience was a life-changing one, as his
investigation penetrated one wall of lies only to be confronted
with another and another -- and not just lies from Oliver North
and his cohorts but lies from nearly every senior administration
official who spoke with investigators. According to Firewall, the
cover-up conspiracy took formal shape at a meeting of Reagan and
his top advisers in the Situation Room at the White House on Nov.
24, 1986. The meeting's principal point of concern was how to
handle the troublesome fact that Reagan had approved illegal arms
sales to Iran in fall 1985, before any covert-action finding had
been signed. The act was a clear felony -- a violation of the
Arms Export Control Act -- and possibly an impeachable offense...
everyone at the meeting knew that Reagan had approved those
shipments through Israel... Bush, who had been told of the
shipment in advance by McFarlane, said nothing. Casey, who [had]
requested that the president sign the retroactive finding to
authorize the CIA-facilitated delivery, said nothing. [NSC
adviser John] Poindexter, who had torn up the finding, said
nothing. Meese asked whether anyone knew anything else that
hadn't been revealed. No one spoke.... When Shultz returned to
the State Department, he dictated a note to his aide, Charles
Hill, who wrote down that Reagan's men were 'rearranging the
record.'...The story might have stopped there but for the work of
Walsh and his small team of lawyers. Yet Walsh's investigation
was hampered from the start by congressional rashness and
hostility from key elements of the media.... Walsh's
investigation broke through the White House cover-up in 1991-92.
Almost by accident, as Walsh's staff was double-checking some
long-standing document requests, the lawyers discovered hidden
notes belonging to Weinberger and other senior officials. The
notes made clear that there was widespread knowledge of the 1985
illegal shipments to Iran and that a major cover-up had been
orchestrated by the Reagan and Bush administrations.... The
Republican independent counsel also infuriated the GOP when he
submitted a second indictment of Weinberger on the Friday before
the 1992 elections. The indictment contained documents revealing
that President Bush had been lying for years with his claim that
he was 'out of the loop' on the Iran-contra decisions. The
ensuing furor dominated the last several days of the campaign and
sealed Bush's defeat at the hands of Bill Clinton. Walsh had
discovered, too, that Bush had withheld his own notes about the
Iran-contra affair, a discovery that elevated the president to a
possible criminal subject of the investigation. But Bush had one
more weapon in his arsenal. On Christmas Eve 1992, Bush destroyed
the Iran-contra probe once and for all by pardoning Weinberger
and five other convicted or indicted defendants. 'George Bush's
misuse of the pardon power made the cover-up complete,' Walsh
wrote. 'What set Iran-contra apart from previous political
scandals was the fact that a cover-up engineered in the White
House of one president and completed by his successor prevented
the rule of law from being applied to the perpetrators of
criminal activity of constitutional dimension."
Firewall: Inside the
Iran-Contra Cover-up - Robert Parry
Consortium News, 1997
Robert Parry is an
investigative reporter who broke many of the Iran-contra stories
for The Associated Press and Newsweek
"I
don't know of anything in the Clinton Administration that
resembles what happened in the Reagan Administration where North
and Poindexter were blamed for running away and doing something
on their own, when in fact, they had been tacitly authorized to
do it either by the President himself, or by implication -- and
when the secretary of defense had written notes exposing the
cover up and nevertheless denied having them both to Congress and
to the Independent Counsel.... I never granted immunity to
[Oliver North and John Poindexter]. Congress did it. I begged
them not to do it. I told them that if they did it, they would
jeopardize the case."
Judge Walsh Interview
INVESTIGATING A PRESIDENT: A CHAT WITH LAWRENCE WALSH
Time Magazine, 28 February 2002
"Walsh's
team had discovered that Weinberger's handwritten notes disproved
Bush's claim that he had been 'out of the loop' and proved that
Weinberger knew full well about $25 million in Saudi
contributions to the contras.... According to Brosnahan, the
trial would have shown that Weinberger knew as early as summer
1985 that President Ronald Reagan had personally authorized
missile shipments to Iran in violation of the Arms Control Export
Act, and that this potentially impeachable act was concealed by
constructing a false record. 'The August [1985] meeting [of
Reagan's National Security Council] discussed having Israel send
the missiles to Iran and replenishing them out of U.S. stocks,'
says Brosnahan. 'Weinberger is responsible for all missiles. The
secretary of defense is the guy.'... Bush subsequently killed the
Weinberger trial (scheduled to start last January) by pardoning
him and five other Iran-contra figures.... This past spring,
emboldened by anti-Walsh sentiment, former President Bush balked
at an earlier understanding that he would submit to unrestricted
Iran-contra questioning after the 1992 election. Having been
pummeled in the media over the length and cost ($36 million-plus)
of his investigation, Walsh shrank from the ugly battle that
would have ensued if he'd tried to drag Bush before a grand jury.
Walsh lost the public-relations battle, even as he finally
exposed the lies that protected the Oval Office from the
consequences of President Reagan's illegal acts. Though Walsh
could finally prove initial crimes and the obstruction of
justice, official Washington didn't want to hear about it.
Iran-contra was too old, too complicated.... But in the context
of helping to pry loose proof of White House wrongdoing, Walsh
has accomplished a remarkable feat: he has salvaged an important
part of American history, so that future generations might
understand the strange events that occurred inside the U.S.
government in the 1980s. It's clear that the full truth on
Iran-contra will never be told. But considering White House
dishonesty, congressional timidity, and the press corps'
complacence, Lawrence Walsh did his best. He wrested from a
determined White House cover-up a substantive if incomplete
accounting of history. He has proven himself no loser."
The White House cover-up that
no one wants you to understand - Robert Parry
Mother Jones, January 1993
Robert Parry is an
investigative reporter who broke many of the Iran-contra stories
for The Associated Press and Newsweek
How one of the two brains behind the Iran-Contra scandal [Poindexter] this week became one of America's most powerful men - Guardian, 18 February 2002
"The
Iran-Contra scandal can be traced to the October Surprise during
the 1980 Presidential election between incumbent Jimmy Carter and
Ronald Reagan"
October Surprise and Iran-Contra - click
here
Back To '911 Cover-Up Wobbles'
The Watergate Tradition - 911 And The Kissinger Files |
|
| 1. Kissinger, Unocal, Enron and Cheney | 5. Kissinger as liar and war criminal |
| 2. Kissinger, Daddy Bush and Iraq | 6. Hamilton and the 'October Surprise' cover-up |
| 3. Daddy Bush and Iran-Contra | 7. Hamilton and the Iran-Contra cover-up |
| 4. 'Watergate', Daddy Bush and Kissinger | 8. Other US Government 'joke' investigations and cover-ups |
What Did Britain Know About 911?
- 28 Aug 2002 |
|
America In Crisis 'October Surprise 2002' - Life After The US Constitutional Coup - 31 Oct 2002 |
|
NATURAL LAW PARTY
WESSEX
nlpwessex@btinternet.com
www.btinternet.com/~nlpwessex