Kissinger, Unocal, Enron and Cheney
"In
November 2001, the Washington Post examined the history of the
Unocal pipeline in a story headlined 'How Afghanistan Went
Unlisted as Terrorist Sponsor.' That story also mentioned
Kissinger's role: 'Unocal appealed to the Taliban and received
assurances that it would support a $4.5 billion project rivaling
the trans-Alaska pipeline. The deal promised to be a boon for the
Taliban, which could realize $100 million a year in transit
fees.' But Unocal also needed U.S. backing. To secure critical
financing from agencies such as the World Bank, it needed the
State Department to formally recognize the Taliban as
Afghanistan's government. 'Unocal hired former State Department
insiders: former secretary of state Henry A. Kissinger, former special U.S. ambassador John
J. Maresca and Robert Oakley, a former U.S. ambassador to
Pakistan.' Zalmay Khalilzad, an Afghan-born former Reagan State
Department adviser on Afghanistan, entered the picture as a
consultant for a Boston group hired by Unocal. Khalilzad and Oakley had dual roles
during this period because the State Department also sought their
advice. Khalilzad is now one of President Bush's top advisers on
Afghanistan.' Which makes me wonder whether Kissinger should be asking questions -- or
answering them."
Oh,
Henry
Salon.com, 3 Dec
2002
"And an
FBI source told The Enquirer: 'Enron and Unocal dumped hundreds of millions of
dollars into Afghanistan and the Taliban. The pipeline would
relieve our dependence on Saudi Arabia -- and Enron would make
billions."
Enron gave Taliban $millions
National Enquirer, 4 March 2002
"A
captured Al Qaida document reveals that US energy companies were secretly negotiating with the
Taliban to build a pipeline. The document was obtained by the
FBI but was not allowed to be shared with other agencies in order
to protect Enron. Multiple sources confirm that
American law enforcement agencies were deliberately kept in the
dark and systematically prevented from connecting the dots before
9/11 in order to aid Enrons secret and immoral Taliban
negotiations.... in January 2001, Vice President Cheney allegedly reinstated the
intelligence block and expanded it to effectively preclude any
investigations whatsoever of Saudi-Taliban-Afghan oil
connections. Former FBI counter-terrorism chief John ONeil
resigned from the FBI in disgust, stating that he was ordered not
to investigate Saudi-Al Qaida connections because of the Enron pipeline deal. [Former Federal Prosecutor John
Loftus] has confirmed that it was ONeil who originally
discovered the AL Qaida pipeline memo after the Embassy bombings
in Africa."
What Congress Does Not Know
about Enron and 9/11
John Loftus, Press Release, 31 May 2002
Kissinger
Should Be Giving, Not Taking, Evidence At The 911 Inquiry
Kissinger,
The Caspian Sea and Afghanistan
Some Questions About 911 That Should Be Put Directly To Kissinger Himself - click here
"Armitage's
Caspian knowledge is not second hand. In addition to his work for
his own consultancy Armitage became a founding Director of the
US-Azerbaijan Chamber of Commerce in 1996 along with a formidable
phalanx of captains from the oil industry including Unocal
President John Imle. At the time the Chamber extended
'deep appreciation to the following companies which have
contributed to its establishment: Amoco, BP America, Chevron,
Exxon, Mobil, Occidental, Panalpina, and Unocal.'
Not too many internet start up companies there. Other interesting
characters who have held positions with this innocuous-sounding
oil industry funded organisation include: James Baker,
Dick Cheney,
Henry Kissinger,
Brent Scowcroft,
John Sununu,
and Richard Perle
."
What Did Britain
Know About 911?
Fight
Smart, 28 Aug 2002
"The Caspian area is there to
be exploited. Oil, natural gas. One pipeline was planned through
the southern Balkans, the split-apart area formerly called simply
Yugoslavia. Standing in the way was a strongman, Slobadan
Milosevic, who took over more or less with the demise of
long-time dictator Marshal Tito who with an iron fist kept the
ethnic and religious groups in check. Milosevic was once
considered charming and popular. Toppling him started with the Henry Kissinger
design of wrecking the Yugoslav banks. Kissinger & Associates
have been a nest of clever snakes fronting for Big Oil and
dictators and butchers worldwide. So, building
on the natural friction between ethnic and religious groups in
Yugoslavia, became the excuse for
the U.S./British attack on the Belgrade government... If not so
bloody and tragic, the whole event would be laughable... Who
would rightfully dare prosecute the U.S./British leaders as war
criminals? The International tribunals, made up of yesmen and
cowards, are a dead letter. "
THE PIPELINE PLOTS, PART ONE
Sholnick's Report, 1/9/2002
US secretly armed Bosnian muslims to fight Serbs - BBC
report
US gave green
light to Hezbollah terrorists in Yugoslavia - Dutch Government
report
"War against terrorism? Not
really. Reminder: it's all about oil. A quick look at the map is
all it takes. It's no coincidence that the map of terror in the
Middle East and Central Asia is practically interchangeable with
the map of oil. There's Infinite Justice, Enduring Freedom - and
Everlasting Profits to be made: not only by the American
industrial-military complex, but especially by American and
European oil giants. Where is the realm these days of former US
secretary of state James Baker, former national security adviser
Brent Scowcroft, former White House chief of staff John Sununu
and former defense secretary and current Invisible Man Dick
Cheney? They are all happily dreaming of, and working for, the
establishment of Pipelineistan.... If the US controls the sources
of energy of its rivals - Europe, Japan, China and other nations
aspiring to be more independent - they win. This explains why
pipelines from the Caucasus to the West have to be
America-friendly - ie Turkish or Macedonian - and not
'nreliable', meaning Russian-controled. Washington, always, has
to control everything: that's what Brzezinski and Henry Kissinger always
said. The same goes for the military bases in Saudi Arabia, and
now in Pakistan and Afghanistan. There's no business like war
business. Thanks to war against Iraq, the US has its military
bases in the Persian Gulf. Thanks to war against Yugoslavia, the
US has its military bases in Bosnia, Kosovo and Macedonia. Thanks
to war against the Taliban, the US is now in Turkmenistan,
Uzbekistan, Pakistan and Afghanistan. Not to mention the base in
Incirlik, Turkey. The US is also in the Caucasus - in Georgia and
Azerbaijan. Iran, China and Russia are practically encircled.
There's no business like show business. Raise the curtains. Enter
Pipelineistan."
Pipelineistan, Parts 1 and 2
Asia Times, 26 January 2002
"The sudden availability of
2.8 trillion cubic feet per year of gas previously committed to
the Russian pipeline system propelled [President] Niyazov [of
Turkmenistan] from an obscure Central Asian strongman to a
central figure in an intricate geopolitical drama that has drawn
in Washington, Tehran, Moscow and assorted regional capitals.
While the prize
in the Caspian is an energy
patch whose size is believed by many to exceed those in Alaska
and the North Sea, the overarching issue is how to get the
commodity out of landlocked Central Asia. The politics of
pipelines seems as tangled as the routes themselves, and each
route carried its own treacherous obstacles. But a simple
ambition had come to unify American policy in the region: Tap the
Caspian mother lodes while giving as little leverage as possible
to Russia in the north and Iran in the south..... To State
Department strategists, the perfect pipeline out of Dauletabad
lay in a different direction: from Turkmenistan across Afghanistan
to Pakistan, connecting the gas resources of Central Asia to the
surging economies of South Asia. Such a line would deprive Iran
of transit fees for Turkmen gas crossing its territory while
capturing the South Asian gas market coveted by Iran.... A Unocal link had strong appeal for Niyazov.
Afghanistan was in turmoil. A big American oil company could draw
on the political muscle of the United States to promote
Turkmenistan's energy interests. In
October 1995, both Bulgheroni and Imle [of Unocal]
followed Niyazov to New York for the opening of the U.N. General
Assembly. Each expected to be chosen to build the Afghan
pipeline, according to sources close to the two men. On Oct. 21,
the nod went to the Americans as Niyazov announced the selection
of Unocal.
Looking on at the announcement ceremony was former secretary of
state Henry A.
Kissinger, now a Unocal consultant...
The defeat of the Kabul government by Taliban fundamentalist
guerrillas in late 1996 brought Unocal
new hope of cutting a deal in Afghanistan...... "
Gas Pipeline Bounces Between Agendas
Washington Post, 10 Ocotober 1998
"Evidently Kissinger's
long-standing connections with oil firms doing business in the
Gulf region are of no concern, either [following his appointment
to Chair the 911 inquiry]. Two petroleum companies were mentioned
in the Times the other day, but nobody dared ask the man whether
he still works for them or any other oil-related businesses. What
about Unocal?
In 1995, Kissinger
showed up for the signing
ceremony in New York that sealed Unocal's
agreement to build a $2 billion, 1,000-mile pipeline from the gas
fields of Turkmenistan through Afghanistan to Pakistan. The
torturous negotiations leading to that aborted deal -- including
Kissinger's cameo -- are fully described in Chapter 12 of
'Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil & Fundamentalism in Central
Asia," by Ahmed Rashid, an authoritative journalist who now
works for the Wall Street Journal. Unocal eventually withdrew
from Turkmenistan, amid charges of bribery and
influence-peddling. (Working for the rival bidder at the time was
Saudi prince Turki al-Faisal, director of the kingdom's
intelligence agency.) What makes that old story interesting again
is the role of Unocal's
partner, described in the Los Angeles Times in May 1998 as 'a
small and mysterious Saudi company called Delta Oil Co. Ltd.' At
the time, Unocal
and Delta were cultivating the friendly leaders of the Taliban to
win approval for their pipeline... In November 2001, the
Washington Post examined the history of the Unocal
pipeline in a story headlined 'How Afghanistan Went Unlisted as
Terrorist Sponsor.' That story also mentioned Kissinger's
role: 'Unocal appealed
to the Taliban and received assurances that it would support a
$4.5 billion project rivaling the trans-Alaska pipeline. The deal
promised to be a boon for the Taliban, which could realize $100
million a year in transit fees.' But Unocal
also needed U.S. backing. To secure critical financing from
agencies such as the World Bank, it needed the State Department
to formally recognize the Taliban as Afghanistan's government. 'Unocal
hired former State Department insiders: former secretary of state
Henry A.
Kissinger, former special U.S.
ambassador John J. Maresca and Robert Oakley, a former U.S.
ambassador to Pakistan.' Zalmay Khalilzad, an Afghan-born former
Reagan State Department adviser on Afghanistan, entered the
picture as a consultant for a Boston group hired by Unocal.
Khalilzad and Oakley had dual roles during this period because
the State Department also sought their advice. Khalilzad is now
one of President Bush's top advisers on Afghanistan.' Which makes
me wonder whether Kissinger
should be asking questions -- or answering them."
Oh,
Henry
Salon.com, 3 Dec
2002
"Kissinger is today a member of the
Pentagon's DefensePolicy Board, appointed at the invitation of
its chairman, Richard Perle. Perle is one of the notorious
members of Washington's 'Wolfowitz cabal' which is leading the
pack for turning the 'war against terrorism' into World War
III...."
Kissinger And Other Taliban Apologists Now
Lead Drive For War Against Islam
Executive Intelligence Review, 13 Nov 2001
Timeline - US Foreign Policy in Afghanistan - 1995
Back To '911 Cover-Up Wobbles'
The Watergate Tradition - 911 And The Kissinger Files |
|
| 1. Kissinger, Unocal, Enron and Cheney | 5. Kissinger as liar and war criminal |
| 2. Kissinger, Daddy Bush and Iraq | 6. Hamilton and the 'October Surprise' cover-up |
| 3. Daddy Bush and Iran-Contra | 7. Hamilton and the Iran-Contra cover-up |
| 4. 'Watergate', Daddy Bush and Kissinger | 8. Other US Government 'joke' investigations and cover-ups |
What Did Britain Know About 911?
- 28 Aug 2002 |
|
America In Crisis 'October Surprise 2002' - Life After The US Constitutional Coup - 31 Oct 2002 |
|
NATURAL LAW PARTY
WESSEX
nlpwessex@btinternet.com
www.btinternet.com/~nlpwessex