“The [British] public is sceptical about the case for building new nuclear power stations, despite concerns that Britain may have to rely on imported gas for future energy needs. Hostility to nuclear power is matched by a belief that renewable sources of energy such as wind farms could fill the gap in energy needs in the next 20 years, the Populus survey finds. It also indicates that politicians are not trusted to tell the truth about nuclear safety. The poll found that 59 per cent of those questioned believe that it would be irresponsible to build more nuclear power stations while problems remain in disposing of nuclear waste … Half of respondents go so far as to say that they believe nuclear power to be unsafe.”
Voters prefer wind farms to new nuclear reactors
London Times, 8 August 2005

Photographic Account Of What Is Left Behind Today
Elena Filatova's Ventures
Into The Chernobyl Exclusion Zones

'Liquidators' were recruited or forced to assist in the cleanup
or the liquidation of the consequences of the Chernobyl accident

"Best everyone can do to keep Chernobyl story active is to pass link of my story to their friends.  People should no just forget Chernobyl happened, like many in government want....  I am a Gamma Girl and I’d still ride [my motorcycle] through empty towns and villages of post apocalyptic land North of Kiev.... With high prices for natural gas and oil, our government has no other choice as to build new reactors, but it is not only in Ukraine, nukes coming to us on a big way, all around the world. Not long ago Tony Blair announced that Great Britain may build new nuclear power plants. In America nuclear program is still frozen after Three Mile accident, but 'The Powers That Be' already seeking approvals at politicians. The problem of victims of Chernobyl is that no one want to see them. Not in here, not in Russia, not in America or Europe. We have different economic and political systems, but greed everywhere is the same.... We’ll never know what effect the radiation is going to have on humans, not as long as money rule the world. Here, if some scientist will publish true research, they will lose their jobs in no time.... I had some problems [when I launched my web site] but I was not in real trouble. Of course, my website bother them, but it didn’t intersect with interests of some particular clan or some financial group.... 'Ghost Town' was on the news in 2004 and I had 3 million unique visitors on my site in April 2004, 2.5 millions in May 2004. Mirrored sites also reported of big traffic. Then papers all around the world start to write that my site is not true and it brought me even more visitors. Now, water has cooled around Chernobyl story, but people still have interest to my web sites. To me it is important to know that my work has permanent value and is not of one day fleeting popularity.... I will continue telling about 'North Wing', the deserted area that is located in neighbouring countries of Belorussia and Russia. I’ve lived in Belorussia and I know the geography and history of a site. I’ve planned something special for 'North Wing', but I doubt I will work on this story in this year. "
Elena Filatova’s Interview With Bikernet (USA)
Bikernet, January 2006

Radiation Hotspots In Ukraine, Belarus, and Russia
Resulting From The Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Accident
(Click On Map To Access Page With Enlarged Version)

"Almost 20 years have passed since the accident and they even didn't start building us a decent sarcophagus.... They have enough means to build new reactors, to bribe news media and politicians all around the world, they rich enough for [artificially] keeping a death toll [statistics] so low for so many years, but they have no means, neither political will to protect people of Europe from nuclear meltdown.... ."
Elena Filatova, 15 September 2005
www.elenafilatova.com

"Plans to build an engineering wonder of the world — a gigantic £300m hangar to prevent a second disaster at Chernobyl — have been stalled by a series of rows between western donors and the Ukrainian government.... The massive structure, officially called the New Safe Confinement, is designed to cover the hastily constructed 'sarcophagus' that encases the highly radioactive remains of Number Four reactor. The sarcophagus was built within months of the disaster, with helicopters lifting slabs of concrete into place to cover the devastated reactor building. An estimated 200 tons of radioactive matter lies within the temporary structure but the sarcophagus and everything within it are contaminated. The European Union and other international donors have spent tens of millions of pounds on stabilising the structure, which many had feared would collapse, releasing its deadly contents in another calamity.... Although most Ukrainians wanted to close down their nuclear industry for years after the accident, four other power stations — including Europe’s largest at Zaporizhya — have continued to operate. Ukraine is dependent for much of its energy, especially gas, on Russia, which quadrupled prices earlier this year as punishment for Ukraine straying away from Moscow’s orbit and cultivating closer ties with the EU and Nato. Developing the country’s nuclear industry has become a priority: Ukraine wants to build up to 13 more reactors for its own needs and to export electricity to western Europe."
Stalled: the Chernobyl rescue Ark
Sunday Times, 23 April 2006

Filatova's Interview To Dagens Nyheter
Sweden's Biggest Daily Newspaper

A Contaminated Europe

"The World Health Organization (WHO) should study how the Chernobyl nuclear disaster affected nations other than Belarus, Ukraine and Russia, a report said on Wednesday, citing a lack of data especially for western Europe. 'Although areas of Belarus, Ukraine and Russia were heavily contaminated, most of Chernobyl's fallout was deposited outside these countries,' said the report, which was carried out by independent researchers and commissioned by Rebecca Harms, a German member of the Greens party in the European Parliament. 'Fallout from Chernobyl contaminated about 40 percent of Europe's surface area,' the report said, adding that populations outside the three countries faced 'twice as many predicted excess cancer deaths'. The study predicted roughly 30,000 to 60,000 cancer deaths by the end of this century related to Chernobyl, which it said was significantly higher than estimates by the WHO and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)."
WHO must study Chernobyl's effect on Europe: report
Reuters, 19 April 2006

(Graphic BBC)

"Twenty years after the [Chernobyl] disaster, epidemiologist John Urquhart told the Nuclear Free Local Authorities conference in London on Thursday that he had found an 'almost perfect correlation' between areas where rain from radioactive clouds fell [in the UK], and an 11% increase in infant deaths. Nationwide averages have so far masked the regional increases in infant death rates. But when seen in conjunction with a detailed nuclear fallout map based on meteorological data, a different picture emerges, he said.  The researcher obtained infant death figures from 1983 to 1992 for 200 hospital districts across England and Wales. He found regional increases in infant deaths following the accident, which happened on 26 April 1986, in areas where plumes of rain brought nuclear fallout onto the ground."
Chernobyl linked to British children's deaths
Edie, 23 March 2006

"More than a third of Britain is still contaminated by radioactivity from the Chernobyl disaster two decades ago, and children are getting cancer as a result, an Independent on Sunday investigation has established. Official measurements - published in a report launched in London yesterday - show that at least 34 per cent of the country will remain radioactive for centuries as the result of the accident, which took place 20 years ago on Wednesday. And scientists have found rates of thyroid cancer in children in Cumbria, the worst-affected part of England, rose 12-fold after the catastrophe - and blame fallout from the radioactive cloud that spread from the stricken reactor. This confounds government assurances at the time that the radiation in Britain was 'nowhere near the levels at which there is any hazard to health.'... The report says the radioactive caesium - and the doses of radiation it gives Britons - will only 'decline slowly over the next few hundred years'."
Chernobyl 'still causing cancer in British children'
Independent, 23 April 2006

"The disaster released at least 100 times more radiation than the atom bombs dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Much of the fallout was deposited close to Chernobyl, in parts of Belarus, Ukraine and Russia. More than 350,000 people resettled away from these areas, but about 5.5 million remain. Contamination with caesium and strontium is of particular concern, as it will be present in the soil for many years. After the accident traces of radioactive deposits were found in nearly every country in the northern hemisphere. But wind direction and uneven rainfall left some areas more contaminated than their immediate neighbours. Scandinavia was badly affected and there are still areas of the UK where farms face post-Chernobyl controls."
The Chernobyl Distater 20 Years On
BBC Online, April 2006

"Before Emlyn Roberts, a North Wales sheep farmer, can take any of his lambs to market, he has to call in the government inspectors with their Geiger counters. They scan the animals for signs of radiation because the land they graze is still contaminated from the Chernobyl nuclear disaster which occurred 20 years ago this month. If the radiation levels are too high, the lambs cannot be sold for meat until they have spent time on other land. Mr Roberts is one of 375 British farmers, with more than 200,000 sheep, whose land is still considered 'dirty' and subject to restrictions brought in after radioactive rains brought contamination to Britain in 1986. When the restrictions were established, farmers were told they would apply for only a few weeks, months at most. Twenty years later, many farmers have had to accept that their land could be affected for years to come."
20 years on, Britain still feels the effects of Chernobyl
Daily Telegraph, 1 April 2006

"The after-effects of the nuclear disaster in Chernobyl in the former Soviet Union are still evident in parts of Central Norway, 20 years after the nuclear reactor exploded on April 26th 1986. Due to the wind and weather conditions at the time, parts of Central Norway received a considerable amount of radioactive fallout. Both sheep farms and reindeer herds were affected, and animals feeding on grass are still given special food additives in order to bring the level of cesium down to normal. Up to now, the Norwegian authorities have spent more than NOK 400 million in various efforts to remedy the after-effects of the explosion at the nuclear power plant."
Chernobyl-effect lingers
Norway Post, 25 April 2006

“The [British] public is sceptical about the case for building new nuclear power stations, despite concerns that Britain may have to rely on imported gas for future energy needs. Hostility to nuclear power is matched by a belief that renewable sources of energy such as wind farms could fill the gap in energy needs in the next 20 years, the Populus survey finds. It also indicates that politicians are not trusted to tell the truth about nuclear safety. The poll found that 59 per cent of those questioned believe that it would be irresponsible to build more nuclear power stations while problems remain in disposing of nuclear waste … Half of respondents go so far as to say that they believe nuclear power to be unsafe.”
Voters prefer wind farms to new nuclear reactors
London Times, 8 August 2005

Chernobyl Cover-up

Paul Fusco: A Children's Home in Minsk, 2000
Der Spiegel Online - The Aftermath of the Chernobyl Disaster

"[MEP] Rebecca Harms, who is taking part in Chernobyl+20 NGO conference in Kiyv, the Ukraine, has slammed down on the [UN] International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA, recent statements which considerably diminish the effects of the Chernobyl consequences..... 'They are not independent, they are working in favour or close to nuclear industry, their job is from the very beginning to spread nuclear power all around the world. So they are in favour [of nuclear power], and that has strange results, they made a falsification of the WHO [World Health Organisation] studies concerning the Chernobyl consequences.'”
Member of the European Parliament wants IAEA off Chernobyl subject
Bellona (Norway), 24 April 2006

"The IAEA's nuclear experts say that Chernobyl has claimed 56 lives to date - 47 workers at the disaster site and nine children who have since died of thyroid cancer. In contrast, the Ukrainian National Council on Radiation Protection claims to have documented 34,499 deaths among rescue workers. The United Nations' World Health Organization (WHO) estimated the number of Chernobyl workers who died from radiation exposure or committed suicide at 50,000 - six years ago.... In a resolution dated May 8, 1986, the [Soviet] politburo ordered allowable radiation doses increased by factors ranging from 10 to 50. In a document titled 'Secret Attachment to Item 10' of the minutes, party officials ordered radioactively contaminated meat turned into sausage, using a 1:10 ratio, throughout the territory of most republics within the USSR, including Russia, but 'excluding Moscow.' Under official order number U-2617 C, issued on June 27, 1986, all data relating to Chernobyl, to the treatment of the victims and to the nature and scope of their radiation exposure was classified. Though signed by Yevgeny Shulshenko, a minor official in the USSR's Ministry of Health, the document was sanctioned by senior party officials and smoothed the way for the subsequent suppression, falsification and destruction of evidence. It wasn't until 1989 that Pravda published a map of the contaminated regions, which showed that 70 percent of the fallout from Chernobyl descended upon Belarus, with the remainder falling onto the Ukraine and southern Russia. This meant that 5 million people living in thousands of villages and a few larger cities in the Soviet Union spent three years living in areas exposed to high levels of radiation while oblivious to the risks involved. Many continued to eat home-grown vegetables and the berries and mushrooms they normally gathered in the forests..... according to the foundation 'Children for Chernobyl,' in the past decade doctors have seen a dramatic increase in deformities among young patients from parts of Belarus and the Ukraine that were exposed to high levels of radiation -- including deformed limbs, missing ears, harelips and feet with up to eight toes.... According to one of the results of [a] study, there has been an almost 20-fold increase in the number of infants born with 'spina bifida' (cleft vertebra). These children with genetic defects are the second generation of Chernobyl victims. And they have fuelled a revival of the debate between scientists and doctors in rival camps - between the IAEA and its opponents. The first round of the debate centered on thyroid cancer. Beginning in 1990, Fred Mettler, a radiologist at the University of New Mexico and a man with years of experience on the pro-nuclear side of radiation damage assessment, began researching the consequences of the Chernobyl reactor accident for the IAEA. In a study he published in 1991, Mettler claimed that there were none, not even children with radiation-induced thyroid cancer. The next year, the British scientific journal Nature published studies showing a dramatic rise in the incidence of thyroid cancer in contaminated regions not far from Chernobyl, and it was revealed that Mettler also had access to the same data from Belarus and the Ukraine. It was clearly an embarrassing revelation for Mettler and the IAEA, but not embarrassing enough to put an end to their relationship. In its most recent report dated September 2005, submitted to the United Nations as part of the 'Chernobyl Forum,' the IAEA has this to say about the issue of genetic defects: 'No evidence was found whatsoever for genetic anomalies that could be attributed to radiation exposure.' One of the authors of the report was none other than Fred Mettler."
The Pompeii of the Nuclear Age
Der Spiegel, 17 April 2006

Der Spiegel Photo Gallery: The Aftermath of the Disaster - Children In Belarus

"United Nations nuclear and health watchdogs have ignored evidence of deaths, cancers, mutations and other conditions after the Chernobyl accident, leading scientists and doctors have claimed in the run-up to the nuclear disaster's 20th anniversary next month. In a series of reports about to be published, they will suggest that at least 30,000 people are expected to die of cancers linked directly to severe radiation exposure in 1986 and up to 500,000 people may have already died as a result of the world's worst environmental catastrophe.... The new estimates have been collated by researchers commissioned by European parliamentary groups, Greenpeace International and medical foundations in Britain, Germany, Ukraine, Scandinavia and elsewhere. They take into account more than 50 published scientific studies. 'At least 500,000 people - perhaps more - have already died out of the 2 million people who were officially classed as victims of Chernobyl in Ukraine,' said Nikolai Omelyanets, deputy head of the National Commission for Radiation Protection in Ukraine. '[Studies show] that 34,499 people who took part in the clean-up of Chernobyl have died in the years since the catastrophe. The deaths of these people from cancers was nearly three times as high as in the rest of the population.' 'We have found that infant mortality increased 20% to 30% because of chronic exposure to radiation after the accident. All this information has been ignored by the IAEA and WHO. We sent it to them in March last year and again in June. They've not said why they haven't accepted it. Evgenia Stepanova, of the Ukrainian government's Scientific Centre for Radiation Medicine, said: 'We're overwhelmed by thyroid cancers, leukaemias and genetic mutations that are not recorded in the WHO data and which were practically unknown 20 years ago.'... In the Rivne region of Ukraine, 310 miles west of Chernobyl, doctors say they are coming across an unusual rate of cancers and mutations. 'In the 30 hospitals of our region we find that up to 30% of people who were in highly radiated areas have physical disorders, including heart and blood diseases, cancers and respiratory diseases. Nearly one in three of all the newborn babies have deformities, mostly internal,' said Alexander Vewremchuk, of the Special Hospital for the Radiological Protection of the Population in Vilne. Figures on the health effects of Chernobyl have always been disputed. Soviet authorities covered up many of the details at the time. The largest radiation doses were received by the 600,000 people involved in the clean-up, many drawn from army conscripts all over the Soviet Union."
UN accused of ignoring 500,000 Chernobyl deaths
Guardian, 25 March 2006

Soviet document classifying as secret all information about Chernobyl accident, including health conditions
Click Here To Download (971k)

"Up to 8,000 Russians have died from the Chernobyl nuclear disaster 20 years ago, health officials said today, amid an ongoing dispute over the number of deaths and long-term health effects caused by the accident. Vladimir Demidov, a Health Ministry official charged with Chernobyl matters, said between 7,000 and 8,000 Russians died as a result of the accident, and some 60,000 have been declared disabled because of the sustained damage to their health."
Up to 8,000 Russians died from Chernobyl accident: Official
ZeeNews (India), 25 April 2006

"One of the most experienced researchers into the Chernobyl disaster has broken his silence to warn European leaders that flirting with nuclear power 'is folly of the first order'. The views of Yuri Bandazhevsky have cost him his reputation as one of the former Soviet Union's most respected scientists and earned him a five-year stint as a prisoner of conscience in Belarus, where contradicting the government line is always a risk.... After years of studying corpses in the mortuaries of Gomel and collecting what available statistics there were on still-births in the affected zones, he concluded that exposure to the radioactive element caesium-137 was causing far more deaths than was generally realised. Six months after being freed, Mr Bandazhevsky is speaking out again now that he sees that nuclear power is once again becoming acceptable in western Europe. 'Not just because of Chernobyl but also because of nuclear testing around the world, the stratosphere holds huge amounts of caesium,' he said. 'To start re-engaging in full-scale nuclear power as Europe seems determined to do is folly of the first order.' An investigation by 100 scientists acting under the auspices of nine United Nations bodies and published last year said that fewer than 50 people died as an immediate result of the accident. It said that the eventual number of deaths attributable to longer-term radiation was unlikely to exceed 9,000. But Greenpeace issued a report by 52 scientists that put the number of terminal cancer cases at 93,000 and said that a further 200,000 might already have died of radiation related illnesses in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus alone. Mr Bandazhevsky, too, rejected the UN study. 'The authors want to draw a line under Chernobyl,' he said. 'The report humiliates the people who suffered from this catastrophe.' Mr Bandazhevsky said that vital information had been suppressed first by the Soviet authorities then by the Belarussian government.... Mr Bandazhevsky used to be a member of five academies of science. Now he is shunned by colleagues who are now too frightened to be seen consorting with him..."
Chernobyl scientist warns of 'nuclear folly'
Daily Telegraph, 24 April 2006

"Ukrainians maintain that tens of thousands of people have died of radiation-related illnesses. After the disaster the city of Pripyat, which housed Chernobyl’s workers and their families, was emptied of inhabitants. Today it has a chilling, post-apocalyptic look to it."
Stalled: the Chernobyl rescue Ark
Sunday Times, 23 April 2006

"The long-term effects of the Chernobyl disaster have been severely underestimated with a new study estimating that the nuclear explosion could eventually cause up to 66,000 deaths from cancer - 15 times more than the formal figures released last September. Nearly 20 years after the world's worst industrial accident, the report suggests the impact of the 1986 nuclear disaster on the UK and the rest of the world may never be fully realised. The Other Report on Chernobyl, otherwise known as Torch, comes ahead of this Wednesday's anniversary. It was co-written by Dr Ian Fairlie and Dr David Sumner."
Chernobyl deaths 'up to 66,000'
Scotsman On Sunday, 23 April 2006

"'The real harvest of Chernobyl is just beginning. Breast, lung and stomach cancers are just beginning to appear, and they are going to increase,' Fairlie told journalists in the European Parliament, adding that the latency period for cancers is 20-50 years."
EU Greens accuse IAEA of underestimating Chernobyl effect, demand new evaluation
Kiev Post, 19 April 2006

"Greenpeace activists tried to deliver samples of radioactive soil taken from Chernobyl to the headquarters of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna yesterday, on the eve of the 20th anniversary of the nuclear disaster. ....The action was meant to 'highlight the IAEA’s continued downplaying of the consequences of the 1986 Chernobyl disaster,' the worst civilian nuclear accident in history, and the continued risk of contamination in the area, Greenpeace, a non-governmental organisation (NGO), said in a statement. About 30 activists brought the two one-kilogram samples, carried for safety reasons in a 250-kilogram concrete container, to the United Nations in Vienna, headquarters to the IAEA, but were turned away. 'The IAEA refused to accept the samples,' Greenpeace campaigner Jan Vande Putte told AFP..."
‘IAEA downplaying Chernobyl’
The Peninsula (Qatar), 25 April 2006

"The April 26, 1986 Chernobyl disaster, the most catastrophic nuclear accident in history, was not so bad after all--or so claims a recent report produced by an international team of scientists convened by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).... Richard Garwin, an internationally renowned physicist and IBM fellow emeritus at the Thomas J. Watson Research Center, calls the report 'deliberately misleading,' arguing that it overlooks evidence that contradicts some of its conclusions. (The report prompted Garwin to respond with a pointed rebuttal, published by UPI on November 9, 2005 and available at the Garwin Archive on the web site of the Federation of American Scientists.) Garwin's criticism centers on what he sees as a glaring omission--the report's failure to cite the findings of a 1993 study produced by the U.N. Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), which estimated that the worldwide 'collective effective dose' from the Chernobyl accident was about 600,000 man-sieverts. He also refers to a report published last summer by the National Academy of Sciences on the effects of ionizing radiation, which concludes that each dose of whole-body radiation causes a lethal cancer at the rate of 0.04 cancer deaths per sievert of exposure. Taken together, these findings point to a much higher death rate than that publicized by the Forum. 'Although it is impossible to identify these 24,000 among the many tens of millions of people who would die from similar cancers from natural causes over the same period,' Garwin noted in his UPI op-ed, 'those deaths are nevertheless a consequence of the radiation release.' Garwin, a nuclear power advocate, calls this omission a 'terrible scandal,' arguing that it lets the industry off the hook.... David Marples, a historian at the University of Alberta who has written several books about the Chernobyl disaster and has done extensive field research in the affected regions, also contests some of the Chernobyl Forum's figures. He finds the report consistent with earlier studies produced by the IAEA, which he says have attempted to minimize the health consequences of radiation exposure while highlighting other factors, like psychology, economics, and living standards. One new feature, says Marples, is the long overdue acknowledgement that the accident caused an outbreak in thyroid cancers among people who were children at the time. According to the report's summary, there have been 4,000 such cases, which are often caused by drinking milk contaminated with radioactive iodine... Len Ackland, the Bulletin's editor at the time of the accident and currently a journalism professor at the University of Colorado, also sees a larger--albeit bleaker--message in the report. Twenty years later, he observes, the prevailing problems at the time of the accident are still with us: 'There is the intimate connection between nuclear energy and nuclear weapons proliferation, and we have yet to overcome the problem of the susceptibility of complex systems to human error. Chernobyl remains the symbol of these dark sides of nuclear power."
Chernobyl: Hardly the last word
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, March/April 2006 pp. 14-16 (vol. 62, no. 02)

What Use Are More Nuclear Reactors?

A Non-Nuclear Future?
Sweden To Switch To Oil Free Economy Without Nuclear

"Sweden recently announced plans to become the world's first oil-free economy within 15 years, without building a new generation of nuclear power stations... "
India, China and the yellowcake supply problem
The Age (Australia), 31 March 2006

Renewable Energy - The Swedes Are Serious About It
Sweden Plans To Go Oil-Free By 2020 With No New Nuclear Power Stations - Click Here

A Non-Nuclear Future?
UK Parliament Launch of ISIS 2006 Energy Report

The Institute of Science in Society Science Society Sustainability http://www.i-sis.org.uk

General Enquiries sam@i-sis.org.uk  Website/Mailing List press-release@i-sis.org.uk ISIS Director m.w.ho@i- sis.org.uk

This article can be found on the I-SIS website at http://www.i- sis.org.uk/PLOIER.php

ISIS Press Release 20/04/06 Which Energy? Parliament Launch of ISIS 2006 Energy Report First Announcement Energy options for a post fossil-fuel world Global warming is accelerating towards the point of no return while fossil fuels are fast depleting. Time and energy resources are both running out. This Report brings together the science, ethics, economics, safety and politics of available energy options to help us make the right choices for a cleaner, greener, healthier, wealthier and more fulfilling life without fossil fuels. “A brilliant Report, full of new information and ideas!” Sponsored by dozens of civil society organisations, politicians and citizens around the world Read the executive summary here: http://www.i- sis.org.uk/ISIS_energy_review_exec_sum.pdf The Report will be available at the Launch Conference Chair by: Tim Yeo, MP for Suffolk South, Chair of Commons Environmental Audit Committee Speakers Peter Ainsworth, MP for East Surrey, Shadow Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Secretary Prof. George Chan, scientific advisor to the government of Mauritius, recipient of several international awards for energy innovation Dr. Mae-Wan Ho, scientific adviser to Third World Network, Director of ISIS and first author of ISIS Energy Report Rt Hon Michael Meacher, MP for Oldham West and Royton, ex Minister for the Environment responsible for negotiating the Kyoto Protocol and other key international agreements for energy and sustainability Alan Simpson, MP for Nottingham, Chair of All Party Warm Houses Group, recently nominated for ITN EcoHero Award Time & Date: 10:00h – 12:30h, Thursday 25 May 2006 Venue: Committee Room 6, House of Commons, Westminster, London SW1A 0AA Admission is free, but places are limited and will be assigned on a first come first serve basis. Please reserve your place immediately by sending us your name and details E-mail: energyconference@i-sis.org.uk Telephone: 0208-452-2729/0207-272-5636 Mail: Energy Conference, ISIS, PO Box 51885, London NW2 9DH

'PEAK OIL'
GLOBAL ENERGY CRISIS LOOMING
Click Here For More Information
www.btinternet.com/~nlpwessex/Documents/energycrisis.htm

NATURAL LAW PARTY WESSEX
nlpwessex@btinternet.com
www.btinternet.com/~nlpwessex