'Fight Smart' Update - 5 June 2004

Don't Take the Bait - Fight Smart
ANIMATED 911 SUMMARY - CLICK HERE
Who is the enemy?

The Rise And Fall Of Dictatorship
D-Day Hero Warned America Of Rise Of Neo-Conservatives
www.btinternet.com/~nlpwessex/Documents/WATEisenhower.htm
Supreme Allied Commander Dwight Eisenhower
Saw Bush Era Coming
Senior UN Official Accuses US Of Running Dictatorship In Iraq
As CIA Chief Departs And Pope Lashes Bush On Way To D-Day Commemorations

"President Bush has arrived in France for celebrations of the
60th anniversary of the allied World War II D-Day landings in Normandy."
Bush Arrives in France for D-Day Commemorations
VOA News, 05 Jun 2004, 14:06 UTC

Dwight D. Eisenhower
Supreme Allied Commander, D-Day Landings, 6 June 1944
President of The United States, 1953-1961

In 1944 The Free World United Against The Tyranny Of The World's Greatest Military Power
In 2004 History Is Repeating Itself As The Bush Regime Edges Towards Collapse

Let The Criminal Proceedings Begin

"My fellow Americans.... America's leadership and prestige depend, not merely upon our unmatched material progress, riches and military strength, but on how we use our power in the interests of world peace and human betterment... This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience.... we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes.... America knows that this world of ours, ever growing smaller, must avoid becoming a community of dreadful fear and hate, and be, instead, a proud confederation of mutual trust and respect. Such a confederation must be one of equals."
Dwight Eisenhower, Farewell Presidential Address, 17 January1961
(Real Video of Eisenhower Speech - Click here)

"You're either with us or against us in the fight against terror"
President George W Bush
CNN, 6 November 2001

1925

"All propaganda must be popular and its intellectual level must be adjusted to the most limited intelligence among those it is addressed to. Consequently, the greater the mass it is intended to reach, the lower its purely intellectual level will have to be. But if, as in propaganda for sticking out a war, the aim is to influence a whole people, we must avoid excessive intellectual demands on our public, and too much caution cannot be extended in this direction.... all effective propaganda must be limited to a very few points and must harp on these in slogans until the last member of the public understands what you want him to understand by your slogan... Thus we see that propaganda must follow a simple line and correspondingly the basic tactics must be psychologically sound."
Adolph Hitler - 'Mein Kampf', Chapter 6

1939-1945

"During the short time since the war began in Iraq, it has been revealing to watch a corresponding war being waged right here in the Land of the Brave and the Free. The reason I categorize it as war is that it conforms to one of the definitions given in the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language: 'a condition of active antagonism or contention.' The reason I identify it as revealing is that it has exposed just how intolerant certain Americans can be of those who are brave enough to exercise their constitutional right to be free to protest a war that they believe to be immoral and antithetical to the interests of their country, as well as the rest of the world. A rising movement has emerged to protest those who protest the war. And those who suggest that war protesters should simply accept the fact that we are at war and line up to support the president are entitled to freely express their opinion. However, theirs is not a brave position to take, nor does it support the free country they feign to defend. In fact, efforts to condemn, stereotype, marginalize and otherwise silence those who stand in opposition to this war are among the most un-American activities imaginable. Therefore, I call for a protest of those who protest those who protest the war. While pretending to act out of love for their country, these phony 'patriots' need to repeat fifth-grade history class until they gain a better grasp of the principles of freedom that America truly stands for. Meanwhile, those who promote the singularly unimaginative concept of blindly supporting our 'elected' leader are not merely guilty of black-and-white thinking. Their automatic compliance is potentially dangerous. Hermann Goering was the Commander-in-Chief of the World War II Luftwaffe (Nazi air force), President of the Reichstag (German Parliament) and Hitler’s designated successor. As such, Goering remains a symbol of the most horrific example of genocide in human history. Having been captured and put on trial by the Allies after the end of World War II, Goering was found guilty of war crimes and was sentenced to death by hanging at the Nuremberg Trials. Hours before his execution, Goering committed suicide by ingesting smuggled cyanide capsules. During the trial, Gustave Gilbert, a psychologist who published his conversations with the prisoners in the book Nuremberg Diary, interviewed Goering. The following is an excerpt from a conversation Gilbert had with Goering in his cell on the evening of April 18, 1946. Goering: 'Why, of course, the people don’t want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally, the common people don’t want war, neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship.' Gilbert : 'There is one difference. In a democracy the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States only Congress can declare wars.' Goering: 'Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.'... Regardless of your position on the war, there is no denying this basic fact: America is not under attack, and certainly not by Iraq. Yet the Bush administration has been doing its utmost since 9/11 to fan the fires of fear among Americans in an effort to convince us that we are being attacked, all evidence to the contrary notwithstanding."
Protest the protest of the protest
Boulder Weekly, 3 April 2003

2000

"Not since 'Mein Kampf' has a geopolitical punch been so blatantly telegraphed, years ahead of the blow. Adolf Hitler clearly spelled out his plans to destroy the Jews and launch wars of conquest to secure German domination of world affairs in his 1925 book, long before he ever assumed power. Despite the zigzags of rhetoric he later employed, the various PR spins and temporary justifications offered for this or that particular policy, any attentive reader of his vile regurgitation could have divined his intentions as he drove his country -- and the world -- to murderous upheaval. Similarly -- in method, if not entirely in substance -- the Bush Regime's foreign policy is also being carried out according to a strict blueprint written years ago, then renewed a few months before the Regime was installed in power by the judicial coup of December 2000. The first version, mentioned in passing here last week, was drafted by a team operating under then-Defense Secretary Dick Cheney in 1992. It set out a new doctrine for U.S. power in the 21st century, an aggressive, unilateral approach that would secure American domination of world affairs -- 'by force if necessary,' as one of the acolytes put it. When the Dominators were temporarily ousted from government after 1992, they continued their strategic planning with funding from the military-energy-security apparatus and right-wing foundations. This culminated in a new group, the aptly-named Project for a New American Century (PNAC). Members included hard-right players like Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Zalmay Khalilzad (now 'special envoy' to the satrapy of Afghanistan) and other empire aspirants currently perched in the upper reaches of government power. In September 2000, PNAC updated the original Cheney plan in a published report, 'Strengthening America's Defenses.'  In this and related documents, the earlier precepts were reiterated and refined. The plans called for unprecedented hikes in military spending, the plantation of American bases in Central Asia and the Middle East, the toppling of recalcitrant regimes, the militarization of outer space, the abrogation of international treaties, the willingness to use nuclear weapons and control of the world's energy resources. And the present course of action was clearly set forth: 'The United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein.' But Iraq is just a stepping stone. Iran is next -- indeed, Cheney, Rumsfeld and the PNAC team say that Iran is 'perhaps a far greater threat' to U.S. oil hegemony. Other nations will follow, including Russia and China. In one way or another -- by military means or economic dominance, by conquest, alliance or silent acquiescence -- they must all be brought to heel, forcibly prevented from 'challenging our leadership or even aspiring to a larger regional or global role.'"
Dark Passage
Moscow Times, 20 September 2002

2001

".... it is clear the US authorities did little or nothing to pre-empt the events of 9/11. It is known that at least 11 countries provided advance warning to the US of the 9/11 attacks. Two senior Mossad experts were sent to Washington in August 2001 to alert the CIA and FBI to a cell of 200 terrorists said to be preparing a big operation. The list they provided included the names of four of the 9/11 hijackers, none of whom was arrested... All of this makes it all the more astonishing - on the war on terrorism perspective - that there was such slow reaction on September 11 itself. The first hijacking was suspected at not later than 8.20am, and the last hijacked aircraft crashed in Pennsylvania at 10.06am. Not a single fighter plane was scrambled to investigate from the US Andrews airforce base, just 10 miles from Washington DC, until after the third plane had hit the Pentagon at 9.38 am. Why not? There were standard FAA intercept procedures for hijacked aircraft before 9/11. Between September 2000 and June 2001 the US military launched fighter aircraft on 67 occasions to chase suspicious aircraft. It is a US legal requirement that once an aircraft has moved significantly off its flight plan, fighter planes are sent up to investigate.... The evidence again is quite clear that plans for military action against Afghanistan and Iraq were in hand well before 9/11.... Given this background, it is not surprising that some have seen the US failure to avert the 9/11 attacks as creating an invaluable pretext for attacking Afghanistan in a war that had clearly already been well planned in advance.... the PNAC blueprint of September 2000 states that the process of transforming the US into 'tomorrow's dominant force' is likely to be a long one in the absence of 'some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor'. The 9/11 attacks allowed the US to press the 'go' button for a strategy in accordance with the PNAC agenda which it would otherwise have been politically impossible to implement. The overriding motivation for this political smokescreen is that the US and the UK are beginning to run out of secure hydrocarbon energy supplies."
Michael Meacher, former Blair government Minister - 'This war on terrorism is bogus'
Guardian, 6 September 2003

"You're either with us or against us in the fight against terror"
President George W Bush
CNN, 6 November 2001

"It is completely possible for the USA to take revenge against terrorists and continue to crush terrorism, month after month, and year after year, but the net result will be a chain of destruction from both sides. We would never like to compare President Bush with Hitler, but if the World War starts from this, what else could be the interpretation? .... In the beginning, when Hitler started his war, all of Germany was with him..... If the government and people of the USA think they can destroy terrorism by starting to destroy terrorists, they should understand that any step in the direction of destruction will have destructive repercussions and will only help to create waves of destruction in time. This is a universal Law of Nature—action and reaction—'As you sow, so shall you reap.'  It is a matter of truthfully facing the facts. The President of the US and the people of all the NATO alliance countries should understand that any war, anywhere, by anyone, will make the reality of war perpetual, as it has been throughout the ages. Wisdom in this scientific age demands eliminating the cause of all wars. We are making these logical inferences because we have a solution."
Maharishi Mahesh Yogi
Proposal for World Peace - Open Letter to President Bush Published In
Washington Post, 23 September 2001
The New York Times, 23 September 2001
International Herald Tribune, 25 September 2001
(click here to view letter, and here and here for more details of proposal)

2002

"Iraq can be seen as the first battle of the fourth world war. After two hot world wars and one cold one that all began and were centered in Europe, the fourth world war is going to be for the Middle East."
Former Director of the CIA, James Woolsey
NATO conference, Prague, November 2002

"This is like being at a Nazi rally.”
Karle Rove, President Bush's political strategist,
as he watches the crowd erupt to Bush making the ceremonial first pitch at a baseball game in
the New York Yankees stadium October 2001
'The Inside story of US cabinet at war'
London Times, 23 Nov 2002

"In an interview with The Times George Soros, the billionaire American financier, accused the Bush Administration of deliberately manipulating the aftermath of September 11 to promote an authoritarian right-wing agenda. Mr Soros singled out Mr Ashcroft’s treatment of [alleged 'dirty bomber'] Padilla, an American citizen who is being held indefinitely as an 'enemy combatant' and denied further access to judicial process. 'I feel that what happened was that Ashcroft basically detonated a ‘dirty bomb plot’,' Mr Soros said. 'The plot is his. The detonation is his. The Bush Administration is exploiting the terrorist threat for its purposes, to generate fear and to overcome constitutional constraints on the use of force.' Mr Soros, who grew up in Hungary under the Nazis, said that the public mood in the US made it difficult to defend civil liberties, but that people should remember the lessons of the 1940s."
Padilla 'travelled in central Asia looking for bomb material'
London Times, 14 June 2002

"The same issues that were placed before the German people in 1933 are now before us, and our grandchildren may one day implore us to explain our silence in the face of a vicious tyranny. It will do you no good to plead the statist’s claim that the current totalitarian structures and unilateral war against the entire world were occasioned by events of September 11th. Just as Adolf Hitler was able to convert the burning of the Reichstag into the raison d’etre for his military campaigns and domestic police-state, George Bush has been exploiting the World Trade Center attacks to advance a political agenda that goes far beyond the brutalities of early September..... There is scarcely a pip being squeaked anywhere in the major media over any of this.... Our experience with Nazi holocaust films may cause us to shake our heads in disbelief over such revelations [in Germany] – after all, Nazism has come to symbolize as heinous a form of tyranny as we can imagine. But how different is our mindset from that of the Germans who, in 1933, watched as their police state was rapidly put into place and who, fifteen years later, could not imagine that anything untoward had taken place? "
When Didn’t They Know It, and What About You?
Butler Shaffer, Southwestern University School of Law, 13 June 2002

"In our name, the government has brought down a pall of repression over society. The president's spokesperson warns people to 'watch what they say'. Dissident artists, intellectuals, and professors find their views distorted, attacked, and suppressed. The so-called Patriot Act - along with a host of similar measures on the state level - gives police sweeping new powers of search and seizure, supervised, if at all, by secret proceedings before secret courts. In our name, the executive has steadily usurped the roles and functions of the other branches of government. ... There is a deadly trajectory to the events of the past months that must be seen for what it is and resisted. Too many times in history people have waited until it was too late to resist. President Bush has declared: 'You're either with us or against us.' Here is our answer: We refuse to allow you to speak for all the American people. We will not give up our right to question. We will not hand over our consciences in return for a hollow promise of safety. We say not in our name. We refuse to be party to these wars and we repudiate any inference that they are being waged in our name or for our welfare. We extend a hand to those around the world suffering from these policies; we will show our solidarity in word and deed. We who sign this statement call on all Americans to join together to rise to this challenge. We applaud and support the questioning and protest now going on, even as we recognise the need for much, much more to actually stop this juggernaut."
Prominent Americans have issued this statement on the war on terror
Guardian, 14 June 2002

2003

"There's a disturbing irony in a U.S. administration that claims it intends to establish democracy in Iraq - yet all the while systematically dismantling democracy at home. Access to information about government actions, the ability to share that information with other citizens and the right to protest government policies are all fundamental to a representative democracy. Open government and open records are not popular concepts with the Bush administration. Yet they are essential to a citizenry that wishes to participate in helping the government select a wise direction in both domestic and foreign policies. Attorney General John Ashcroft, with the blessing of the Bush administration, has stifled the flow of information and its sharing - in the name of national security. Crucial government Web sites have been shut down. Access to presidential records has been dramatically limited. Freedom of Information Act requests for government documents have been denied or the documents heavily blacked out. The president and the attorney general have both refused to give proper congressional committees the information they have requested. These House and Senate committees are supposed to exercise oversight in regard to the Department of Justice. President George W. Bush has forced peaceful protesters into so-called Free Speech Zones - out of sight and hearing of the president - as he passes by in his motorcade. Only those cheering citizens who support Bush and his policies are allowed curbside to be seen by the president..... In a recent interview, now retired General Tommy Franks, who led the U.S. military invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, told the men's lifestyle magazine Cigar Aficionado that if the United States were hit with a weapon of mass destruction that inflicted large casualties, the Constitution would probably be discarded in favor of a form of military government. Such a statement from a former four-star general may be meant to prepare the American people for the end of their constitutional form of government, the end of democracy. Because Franks said it, however, doesn't mean it will happen. The Constitution has survived more than 200 years of wars and serious threats to the nation. Franks's statement may be a scare tactic or a political trial balloon to see how the American public reacts. In either case, the general's comment reveals his own doubts about the inner strength and will of the American people - to uphold the rule of law and to trust the document that has made their nation great, the U.S. Constitution."
Dismantling US Democracy
International Herald Tribune, 23 December 2003

2004

"Lakhdar Brahimi, wrapping up his U.N. mission to bring an interim government to Iraq, looked a little tired and disheartened Wednesday as he said the compromise he negotiated was the best possible under American control. When the U.S.-appointed Governing Council announced this week that it had selected a new prime minister, Brahimi seemed to be caught flat-footed. The man tapped for the post, Iyad Allawi, has close ties to the CIA. Almost immediately after being named prime minister, he called for the United States to keep its troops in Iraq, a position unpopular with many Iraqis. Asked how big a role the American administration had in forming the government and selecting the prime minister and president, Brahimi reminded reporters that American Ambassador L. Paul Bremer runs things in Iraq. 'Bremer is the dictator of Iraq,' he said. 'He has the money. He has the signature.' He later added: 'I will not say who was my first choice, and who was not my first choice ... I will remind you that the Americans are governing this country.'"
UN's Brahimi: Bremer the 'Dictator of Iraq' in Shaping Iraqi Government
Knight-Ridder, 3 June 2004

"CIA Director George Tenet resigned yesterday citing 'personal reasons.' Tenet, who was the second longest serving director of Central Intelligence, informed Bush of his decision in an hour-long White House meeting Wednesday night. In what The New York Times describes as an 'almost bizarre' announcement, the president revealed the news in a hurriedly arranged appearance before television cameras before leaving on a trip to Europe.... Despite his claims, many analysts say that Tenet is a fall guy for an administration plagued by accusations of misconduct. In recent months, the Bush administration has attempted to lay much of the blame for its false claims about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, its handling of 9/11 and its justification for the war in Iraq on Tenet. The move also came amid a storm over an alleged Pentagon leak of highly classified intelligence to US-backed Iraqi exile leader Ahmad Chalabi. After the announcement, Chalabi charged that Tenet himself was behind the allegations against him"
Fall Guy for the Bush Regime? CIA Director George Tenet Resigns
Pacifica Radio, 2 June 2004

"President Bush confirmed on Thursday that he had consulted a private lawyer to see if he needed legal advice to deal with the grand jury investigation into how the identity of an undercover C.I.A. officer was revealed. At issue is who told the syndicated columnist Robert D. Novak last summer that Valerie Plame, the wife of the former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV, was an officer with the Central Intelligence Agency. Mr. Novak attributed the information to two 'senior administration officials.'... At the time, the White House was unhappy because Mr. Wilson had publicly questioned the president's statement in his 2003 State of the Union address that Saddam Hussein had sought to purchase uranium in Africa. Under federal law, disclosure of the identity of an undercover intelligence officer can be a felony."
Bush Confirms He's Consulted Lawyer on C.I.A. Agent Inquiry
New York Times, 4 June 2004

The Bush Family History
A Long Association With Dictatorship

"The president of the Florida Holocaust Museum said Saturday that George W. Bush's grandfather derived a portion of his personal fortune through his affiliation with a Nazi-controlled bank. John Loftus, a former prosecutor in the Justice Department's Nazi War Crimes Unit, said his research found that Bush's grandfather, Prescott Bush, was a principal in the Union Banking Corp. in Manhattan in the late 1930s and the 1940s. Leading Nazi industrialists secretly owned the bank at that time, Loftus said, and were moving money into it through a second bank in Holland even after the United States declared war on Germany. The bank was liquidated in 1951, Loftus said, and Bush's grandfather and great-grandfather received $1.5 million from the bank as part of that dissolution. 'That's where the Bush family fortune came from: It came from the Third Reich,' Loftus said.... The World War II experience points out how easy it was then -- and remains today -- to hide money in multinational funds. That money flows into American politics today, he said, from 'a series of multinational corporations behaving like pirates. They don't care about ideology; they care about money.'... Loftus' speech left many in tears. 'I am absolutely shocked,' said Nancy Krauss of Punta Gorda. 'I wish this would have come out before the election. My husband voted for Bush. I don't think he would have voted for him if he would have known.'"
Author links Bush family to Nazis
Herald Tribune Newscoast, 11 November 2000

"....while President Bush publicly embraced the community of holocaust survivors in Washington last spring, he and his family have been keeping a secret from them for over 50 years about Prescott Bush, the president's grandfather. According to classified documents from Dutch intelligence and US government archives, President George W. Bush's grandfather, Prescott Bush made considerable profits off Auschwitz slave labor. In fact, President Bush himself is an heir to these profits from the holocaust which were placed in a blind trust in 1980 by his father, former president George Herbert Walker Bush. Throughout the Bush family's decades of public life, the American press has gone out of its way to overlook one historical fact - that through Union Banking Corporation (UBC), Prescott Bush, and his father-in-law, George Herbert Walker, along with German industrialist Fritz Thyssen, financed Adolf Hitler before and during World War II. It was first reported in 1994 by John Loftus and Mark Aarons in The Secret War Against the Jews: How Western Espionage Betrayed the Jewish People. The US government had known that many American companies were aiding Hitler, like Standard Oil, General Motors and Chase Bank, all of which was sanctioned after Pearl Harbor. But as The New York Times reporter Charles Higham later discovered, and published in his 1983 groundbreaking book, Trading With The Enemy; The Nazi American Money Plot 1933-1949, 'the government smothered everything during and even after the war.'... However, Prescott Bush's banks were not just financing Hitler as previously reported. In fact, there was a distinct business link much deeper than Mr. Higham or Mr. Loftus knew at the time their books were published. A classified Dutch intelligence file which was leaked by a courageous Dutch intelligence officer, along with newly surfaced information from U.S. government archives, 'confirms absolutely,' John Loftus says, the direct links between Bush, Thyssen and genocide profits from Auschwitz. The business connections between Prescott Bush and Fritz Thyssen were more direct than what has been previously written. This new information reveals how Prescott Bush and UBC, which he managed directly, profited from the Holocaust. A case can be made that the inheritors of the Prescott Bush estate could be sued by survivors of the Holocaust and slave labor communities. To understand the complete picture of how Prescott Bush profited from the Holocaust, it is necessary to return to the year 1916, where it all began...."
Heir to the Holocaust
Clamour Magazine, 6 May 2002

"Prescott Bush, the grandfather of the US president George W bush, during WW2 had financial links with the nazis, thanks to whom he made his fortune as a banker.... Prescott Bush was a director and shareholder of the United Banking Corporation, which acquired from the nazi industrialist Fritz Thyssen, the Consolidate Silesian Steel Corporation, where prisoners from Auschwitz worked. During the summer in 1942, this was reported in the American press and the US government examined the books of UBC. On the 20th of October, the government commenced action against the company under the trading with the enemy act (sic) which Franklin D. Roosevelt enacted a week after the attack on Pearl Harbor in December 1941."
Bushes and The Nazis
Newsweek Magazine (Polish Edition), 9 June 2003

"....The Nazi army had been equipped by Flick, Harriman, Walker and Bush, with materials essentially stolen from Poland......In many ways, Bush's Hamburg-Amerika [shipping] Line was the pivot for the entire Hitler project....Certain actions taken directly by the Harriman-Bush shipping line in 1932 must be ranked among the gravest acts of treason in this century.  The U.S. embassy in Berlin reported back to Washington that the 'costly election campaigns' and 'the cost of maintaining a private army of 300,000 to 400,000 men' had raised questions as to the Nazis' financial backers. The constitutional government of the German republic moved to defend national freedom by ordering the Nazi Party private armies disbanded. The U.S. embassy reported that the Hamburg-Amerika Line was purchasing and distributing propaganda attacks against the German government, for attempting this last-minute crackdown on Hitler's forces....The executive board of the Hamburg Amerika Line (Hapag) met jointly with the North German Lloyd Company board in Hamburg on Sept. 5, 1933. Under official Nazi supervision, the two firms were merged. Prescott Bush's American Ship and Commerce Corp. installed Christian J. Beck, a long-time Harriman executive, as manager of freight and operations in North America for the new joint Nazi shipping lines (Hapag-Lloyd) on Nov. 4, 1933. According to testimony of officials of the companies before Congress in 1934, a supervisor from the Nazi Labor Front rode with every ship of the Harriman-Bush line; employees of the New York offices were directly organized into the Nazi Labor Front organization; Hamburg-Amerika provided free passage to individuals going abroad for Nazi propaganda purposes; and the line subsidized pro-Nazi newspapers in the U.S.A., as it had done in Germany against the constitutional German government....Two months before moving against Prescott Bush's Union Banking Corporation, the U. S. government ordered the seizure of all property of the Hamburg-Amerika Line and North German Lloyd, under the Trading with the Enemy Act..... For his part in the Hitler revolution, Prescott Bush was paid a fortune."
George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography
by Webster G. Tarpley & Anton Chaitkin

"The Bush Hitler Project" - Click Here

Ex-CIA Chief Predicted 'Peak' Oil Crisis In 1999 CFR Paper - 23 May 2004
Where Was The US Airforce On 911? - 25 April 2004
The Silence Of George Tenet - 911 And The Israeli-Russian Connection - 18 April 2004
From Macedonia To Enron - Rice Must Explain Pre-911 National Security Priorities - 5 April 2004
American Sponsored Islamic Jihad In Yugoslavia - 27 March 2004
Is Bush Camp Preparing Another 'October Surprise' For The 2004 US election? - 21 March 2004
911 Inquiry Must Investigate US Military Command, Intelligence Services, and Cheney - 24 Feb 2004
Hutton And The Libyan Black Gold Rush - 8 Feb 2004
Hussein Kamel And The Big Anglo-American Deception - 4 Jan 2004
Iraq: British Government admits to 'Operation Mass Appeal' - 28 Dec 2003
Iraqgate 2003 - Dr Kelly and 'Operation Rockingham' - 19 Oct 2003
A Vision For Transforming America - 24 March 2003
This Is Our Prime Minister - 23 Feb 2003
What Is Happening To Britain And America? - 9 Feb 2003
The 911 Omar Sheikh Files - 2 Jan 2003
'October Surprise 2002' - Life After The US Constitutional Coup - 31 Oct 2002
What Did Britain Know About 911? - 28 Aug 2002
Why Did Bush Not Act On Sept 11? - 9 May 2002
World Peace Offered From Hiroshima - 22 April 2002
Did Sept 11 victims die for Enron? - 8 March 2002
CIA provided funds to financiers of Sept 11 bomber - 18 Nov 2001