'Fight Smart' Update - 2 April 2002

Don't Take the Bait - Fight Smart
ANIMATED PHOTO ESSAY - CLICK HERE
Who is the enemy?

OK, It's Out In The Open Now
The 'War-Against-Terrorism ' Is About Empire
As Blair Prepares To Meet Bush
www.btinternet.com/~nlpwessex/Documents/WATempire.htm

"Struggling to get a handle on U.S. foreign policy?....Today, America is no mere superpower or hegemon but a full-blown empire in the Roman and British sense. That, at any rate, is the consensus of some of the most notable U.S. commentators and scholars.... Americans are used to being told - typically by resentful foreigners - that they are imperialists. But lately some of the nation's own eminent thinkers are embracing the idea. More astonishing, they are using the term with approval. From the isolationist right to the imperialist-bashing left, a growing number of experts are issuing stirring paeans to American empire. The Wall Street Journal's editorial features editor, Max Boot said: '... the Sept. 11 attack was a result of insufficient American involvement and ambition; the solution is to be more expansive in our goals and more assertive in their implementation' .... Classicists may scoff at the idea that democratic America has much in common with the tyrannical Rome of Augustus or Nero. But the empire camp points out that however unlikely the comparison, America has often behaved like a conquering empire."
New York Times, April 2, 2002

"Tony Blair has provoked alarm and concern within his own party and in several Western capitals by allowing his chief foreign policy advisor to call for a 'new imperialism' to re-order the post-September 11 world.   The call for a 'defensive imperialism', with Western countries, particularly Britain and the European Union intervening abroad to restore order, comes in a pamphlet that has a foreword by Blair himself.   Blair's advisor, Robert Cooper, who represented the British government at the Bonn talks that produced the interim Hamid Karzai administration in Afghanistan, is known to have heavily influenced the British prime minister's foreign policy thinking. Cooper, who argues for a 'post-modern' apartheid-like duality of laws and systems to deal with 'ourselves and the premodern world', says the West will have to employ 'double standards'....He said that like the old empire, Western countries would have to deal with 'old-fashioned states outside the postmodern continent of Europe with the rougher methods of an earlier era - force, pre-emptive attack, deception, whatever is necessary to deal with those who still live in the nineteenth century...' "
BLAIR'S BRITAIN WANTS A RETURN TO 'AGE OF EMPIRE'
Times of India, 28 March 2002
Full Article - Click Here

New York Times
http://www.iht.com/articles/53203.htm

Struggling to get a handle on U.S. foreign policy? For starters, try dusting off your Livy and boning up on the Second Punic War. Or dip into a good history of 19th-century Britain, paying close attention to those dazzling military campaigns in the Middle East - the Battle of Omdurman, say, or the Second Afghan War.

Today, America is no mere superpower or hegemon but a full-blown empire in the Roman and British sense. That, at any rate, is the consensus of some of the most notable U.S. commentators and scholars.

"People are now coming out of the closet on the word 'empire,'" said the conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer. "The fact is no country has been as dominant culturally, economically, technologically and militarily in the history of the world since the Roman Empire."

Americans are used to being told - typically by resentful foreigners - that they are imperialists. But lately some of the nation's own eminent thinkers are embracing the idea. More astonishing, they are using the term with approval. From the isolationist right to the imperialist-bashing left, a growing number of experts are issuing stirring paeans to American empire.

The Weekly Standard kicked off the parade early last fall with "The Case for American Empire," by The Wall Street Journal's editorial features editor, Max Boot. Quoting the title of Patrick Buchanan's last book, "America: A Republic, not an Empire," Boot said, "This analysis is exactly backward: the Sept. 11 attack was a result of insufficient American involvement and ambition; the solution is to be more expansive in our goals and more assertive in their implementation."

Calling for the military occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq, Boot cited the stabilizing effect of 19th-century British rule in the region. "Afghanistan and other troubled lands today," he wrote, "cry out for the sort of enlightened foreign administration once provided by self-confident Englishmen in jodphurs and pith helmets."

Since then, the empire idea has caught on. In January, Charles Fairbanks, a foreign policy expert at Johns Hopkins University, told an audience at Michigan State University that America was "an empire in formation." Last month, a Yale University professor, Paul Kennedy - who 10 years ago was predicting America's ruin from imperial overreach - went further.

"Nothing has ever existed like this disparity of power," Kennedy wrote in the Financial Times of London. "The Pax Britannica was run on the cheap, Britain's army was much smaller than European armies and even the Royal Navy was equal only to the next two navies - right now all the other navies in the world combined could not dent American maritime supremacy. Napoleon's France and Philip II's Spain had powerful foes and were part of a multipolar system. Charlemagne's empire was merely western European in its stretch. The Roman Empire stretched further afield, but there was another great empire in Persia and a larger one in China. There is no comparison." The most extended statement from the empire camp to date is "Warrior Politics: Why Leadership Demands a Pagan Ethos" (Random House, 2001), a recent book by the journalist Robert Kaplan.

Arguing that "times have changed less than we think," Kaplan suggests the nation's leaders turn to ancient chroniclers - as well as Winston Churchill's 1899 account of the British conquest of the Sudan - for helpful hints about how to navigate today's world. He devotes a chapter to the Second Punic War ("Rome's victory in the Second Punic War, like America's in World War II, made it a universal power") and one to the cunning Emperor Tiberius. Granted, the emperor was something of a despot, writes Kaplan. Still, he "combined diplomacy with the threat of force to preserve a peace that was favorable to Rome."

If that sounds familiar, you've got the right idea. "Our future leaders could do worse than be praised for their tenacity, their penetrating intellects and their ability to bring prosperity to distant parts of the world under America's soft imperial influence," Kaplan writes. "The more successful our foreign policy, the more leverage America will have in the world. Thus, the more likely that future historians will look back on 21st-century United States as an empire as well as a republic, however different from that of Rome and every other empire throughout history."

Classicists may scoff at the idea that democratic America has much in common with the tyrannical Rome of Augustus or Nero. But the empire camp points out that however unlikely the comparison, America has often behaved like a conquering empire. As Kennedy put it, "From the time the first settlers arrived in Virginia from England and started moving westward, this was an imperial nation, a conquering nation."

America's imperial behavior continues today. "The United States has bases or base rights in 40 countries," he said. "In the assault on Al Qaeda and the Taliban, they moved warships from Britain, Japan, Germany, Southern Spain and Italy."

Today, the empire scholars acknowledge that America tends to operate not through brute force but through economic, cultural and political means. The idea seems to be that it is easier to turn other people into Americans than for Americans to make war on them.

"We are an attractive empire, Boot said. And that, empire enthusiasts say, is the reason to root for a Pax Americana. In an anarchic world, with rogue states and terrorist cells, a globally dominant United States offers the best hope for peace and stability, they argue.

"There's a positive side to empire," Kaplan said. "It's in some ways the most benign form of order."

Did Sept 11 victims die for Enron? - 8 March 2002

Terrorist reprisals are all but certain now that the U.S. has launched its military campaign to 'eradicate' terrorism. For this reason, a proven solution to terrorism is especially urgent. Please follow the link below, read carefully, and act decisively. There is no other effective defense against terrorism.
Please click here

'Peace Against Terrorism' - The Turning Point - 14 March 2002

Congressman Dennis Kucinich - Peace And Nuclear Disarmamant A Call To Action

Interview - Kucinich In Terms of a Democracy

Additional Press Reports of Interest - 2002

Pearl Slaying Suspects to be Tried in Secret
(And is this why?) GN Online Pearl was probing spy agencies' role
Bush Amends Terror Doctrine
MIDEAST TERROR WAR ADDS URGENCY TO CARLYLE GROUP CONTROVERSY
Israeli Spying in the US chronology
Taiwan-gate The scandal that threatens to destroy the Bush White House
Greg Palast on Theft of the Presidency
The Case for Sedition High Crimes of the Bush Cabal (Part 1), by Al Martin
Oprah Declines Bush Afghan Invite
Thousands Protest Possible US Action
Bush Usurps Congress, Appoints Foes of Campaign Finance Reform and Civil Rights
Bush Vows to Seek Conservative Judges
Don't always trust what they tell you in the war on terror
US to help oil-rich Azerbaijan defend Caspian Sea boundary
Bush comes to shove
Senator Lieberman Seeks Enron Contacts from White House, Energy Task Force
US rejects world court for fear of partisan lawsuits
Americans covertly training Kazakh troops
The US Army Secretary's Business
Protestors decide to bankrupt the World Bank
US offers Turkey Iraqi oilfields
Baghdad-Kuwait Accord — Support Is Rebuff to Bush's Efforts
Energy Industry's Recommendations to Bush Became National Policy
Europe's Anger at U.S. Reaches Boiling Point
Defiant Prodi warns of US rift
Momentum growing for inquiry into oddities of September 11
Another Top Microbiologist Dies - 12 In The Last Five Months
Bush Administration Orders New Generation Nuclear Weapons
Administration `hid something' in Enron case
Heavy editing of energy papers criticized
Crony Capitalism Goes Global
Enron Scandal Linked to Terrorist Threat
William Rivers Pitt Enron The Slow Burn
Reality, Pentagon style
C.I.A. & DRUGS
Milosevic and the Impeachment of President Clinton, Part 2
Al-Qaeda's Satellite Phone Records Revealed - No Calls To Iraq
Chicago Tribune Pipeline politics taint U.S. war
Berezovsky's Film Broadcast by Latvian Television Station
Propaganda, American-style
Bush and Hitler Is History Repeating Itself!
BRAZIL QUESTIONS SEPT 11 STORY; THE CFR FREAKS OUT
Bush Administration Signals End To Open Government
The CIA's Death Squad Body Count Continues to Pile Up
Britain accused on terror lab claim
Pentagon backs off after suggesting new evidence of link between Somalia and al-Qaida
Enron Pipedreams Buried in Afghanistan
STUNNING DEPTHS OF GOVERNMENT COLLABORATION WITH ENRON REVEALED
NATO crimes in 1999. war against Yugoslavia
Bush Employs Iran - Contra Veterans
THE LUST FOR BLOOD AND OIL
Bush Flatly Refuses to Hand Over Energy Papers
US Military Might - The Facts
UNITED NATIONS-NO PROOF SADDAM GASSED THE KURDS

NLPWessex War on Terrorism Archives - click here

  NATURAL LAW PARTY WESSEX
nlpwessex@bigfoot.com
www.btinternet.com/~nlpwessex

Back to Home Page