![]()
If a client (or a group of people) wants to work with subpersonalities,
the first stage is encourage identification of (not with) a major subpersonality. Only by becoming acquainted with our major subpersonalities can we turn them from being in control of
us to being utilised by us. To begin with, it is helpful to work with only a
few subpersonalities at a time, to avoid confusion
for a client or group participant unfamiliar with the concept.
There are several routes into recognising subpersonalities.
Most, drawing on psychosynthesis, make use of
imagery. My own experience of these techniques, which are
explained below, is very pleasant. However, my
experience of presenting the concept of subpersonalities
to hesitant, vulnerable clients as well as to suspicious, down-to-earth group
members, from within an imagery framework is that it is encouraging them to
accept the validity of a new and unfamiliar idea as a result of, at best
playing childish games, and at worst, engaging in an activity of which they
consider themselves incapable. Many people seem to find it hard to trust
their imagination. In response, over a period of years, I have developed two
techniques to avoid the overt use of imagery.
When counselling individual clients I employ a technique similar to the
Empty Chair Technique used by gestalt practitioners. In this, having encouraged
some loose identification of "a particular bit of" the client, I talk
increasing to the subpersonality with which we are
working. Using fairly intense rapport-building skills,
I encourage the client to speak to me from that subpersonality,
and also periodically reflect on what we are discovering. I do not attempt to
explain what is happening because reception of such an explanation would be
likely to precipitate a further subpersonality shift
in the client, which would defeat the object.
When working with groups of people, I do not know what subpersonality
is being explored by each group participant. I use a
structured set of questions, to which group participants respond individually
(usually on paper). The questions are structured to
lead inwards, the more challenging ones towards the end. A feature of the
questions is their ordinariness. This is because I am keen for participants to
expose for themselves to, and to work with, parts of themselves
that are real and everyday for them, as distinct from those parts which are
hidden from view. Subpersonalities play a major role
in the ordinary life of most people, and there is no need to sideline interest
in subpersonalities by making them too distant.
At the end of the exercise, after the feedback, I distribute copies of the
questions on paper. During the exercise, however, I deliver the questions
orally. This has a number of advantages. First, I can sense
the pace of the group, and whilst each group member is working alone, there
remains an awareness of the group by the group, offering safety in an
unfamiliar task (occasionally I preface the exercise with a brief relaxation
sequence in order to reduce anxiety) and reducing the possibility of a
participant's over-identification with the subpersonality
being explored. Second, I use the sound of my voice and the sequence of
words to alter the level of awareness of many of the participants. This gradual
process encourages the suspension of disbelief, and helps the participants to
become increasingly aware of their interior life.
I do not attempt to start the exercise from a state of altered awareness as
this would not only set the exercise apart from normality, but would also
encourage the participants to lose touch with their ‘everyday self’ (or ‘group
self’). Third, I can tailor the vocabulary I use to the group, so that with
health care professionals I tend to use a more formal register than that which
I use with Community and Youthwork students. The
following sets out the kind of things I say.
· This exercise has been designed to help identify principal subpersonalities. You can probably work successfully on only one subpersonality at a time, although you may find that, to begin with, you conflate two or more. Worry not, for as you continue to work with them, they will become increasingly differentiated.
· Think of yourself doing something that you often or typically do. Something that has a usualness about it for you, in that you do not feel as though you are acting out of character. As you think about you doing that, or being that, or being in that situation, what words or phrases come to mind? To carry out the exercise, you may find it helpful to use a pen and paper.
· Go through the questions sequentially, for they are designed to lead you inwards. The questions are of value in making subpersonalities concrete and explicit. After you have been through the list once, skim each of the responses again to see if you wish to add anything to your responses. Do not be anxious if you find yourself unable to write much or anything in response to the odd question, as this is normal. One of the points about subpersonalities is that they are partial, and by their nature incomplete.
· Unless otherwise made clear, the term ‘you’ is used to indicate that part of the whole you about which you now are thinking: you in that frame of mind, you in that subpersonality.
The following questions are likely to become helpful only once several subpersonalities have been identified and
described.
I have taken the following exercise from the late Malcolm
Sweeting (1), who developed it from Piero Ferrucci
(2). The exercise is more typical of those used with people who are familiar
with personal development. The exercise demands a high level of self-awareness,
as well as a mental fluency or even agility. Part of my reservation about this
method is that it connects more weakly with ‘how I am in real life’.
![]()
![]()
This
document in all parts is copyright ©