![]()
As a counsellor, I work with the subpersonalities of
a counselling client when the client finds it helpful. There
are three simple ways in which clients find it helpful to address their subpersonalities. An understanding of subpersonalities helps clients:
Once a client understands something of the concept of subpersonalities,
and recognise some of their own, they are easily able to understand their own
contradictory behaviour, thoughts and emotions. No counselling client with whom
I have worked in this way has failed to grasp this. Behaviour, thoughts and
emotions which are otherwise incomprehensible, pose
more of a difficulty. However, working in a client-centred fashion, I attempt
to stay in the client's frame of reference, which means that together we can
affirm behaviour, thoughts and emotions which are less
acceptable when censored by the vehicle of the subpersonalities
used most of the time. It feels good when a client spontaneously realises a
principal need or strength of a subpersonality that had previously been considered only troublesome.
The third use which clients make of understanding their subpersonalities is becoming more aware of what is
involved for them in making decisions. When a client recognises that different subpersonalities are bound to be pulling in different
directions, then it becomes obvious that, rather than
simply feeling uncomfortably torn, an agenda has been set, and constructive
work can be done to address the needs of different subpersonalities.
In addition to these points, some clients, when recognising particular subpersonalities, or "bits of themselves" as I
tend to say, feel liberated to go and `be that subpersonality' for a while, in the appropriate
environment. This pluralistic approach is empowering, and can allow clients to
gain confidence in situations in which a silent voice had formerly carped.
By way of contrast, the following exercise, drawn from Piero Ferrucci (1), is
typical of the `integrationist' position. It starts from a state of altered
awareness (walking through countryside), and is therefore communicating that I
may be expecting, or be expected, to work with hidden parts of myself. A strength of the exercise is that it will allow the ‘transformation’
or reframing of poor quality features of the subpersonality
into high quality features. The weakness of the exercise for me is that the
frame of reference remains ‘I’, and is a form of personality totalitarianism.
![]()
![]()
This
document in all parts is copyright ©