Authentic Counselling Training

Personality Dissociation:
Subpersonalities and Multiple Personality

 [Under construction: 1 July 2005]

Potential in subpersonalities

An understanding of our own subpersonalities offers considerable scope for understanding ourselves, and similarly other people. For instance, I have come to understand a reason for not coping well with business lunches: the parts of me that value or enjoy eating do not value involvement in business, and those parts of me involved in business neither value nor enjoy eating. Similarly, using the idea of subpersonalities, I can make sense of group hysteria, and religious conversion, and their fragility.

By recognising, exploring and taking notice of my subpersonalities, I can understand why some changes of activity, requiring different subpersonalities, feel seamless, whilst others are so uncomfortable it can take hours for the shift to occur, and then only with extreme difficulty. For instance, I can slip smoothly back and forth between being a business person to being a fast-lane motorway cruiser, despite them having different sets of values. I can ease my way fairly comfortably between being a father and being a house cleaner. By way of contrast, however, I find the transition from father subpersonality to business person subpersonality uncomfortable, but, surprisingly, eased by the fast-lane motorway cruiser; and extreme difficulty migrating from being a counsellor to being a business person, whereas the transition the other way is easy.

What I stand to gain in the long term from a clear understanding of my subpersonalities is the ability to predict with some accuracy how I am likely to experience situations and events. If I can do this for me, then it can also be performed with clients. More radically, I can learn to recognise triggers for subpersonality shifts, and use these to my advantage. No doubt along with many other people, I find I drive more assertively when I play rock music loudly on my car stereo. Carrying chalk and flip chart markers help into my role as a trainer. The `integrationist' model is much less accepting of the use to be made of subpersonalities. It has as its goal the (re-)unification of all subpersonalities. This is an ideological, rather than practical, approach, and appears to me to flow from over-developing the valuable move away from being controlled by subpersonalities about which we know little, towards making use of subpersonalities about which we know much. The following exercise, drawn from Piero Ferrucci (1), underlines the psychosynthesis dynamic towards integration.

Exercise Four

  • Purpose: To integrate a subpersonality and encourage its evolution.
  • Pick a subpersonality on which you have already been working and with which you feel familiar. Then visualise it clearly and in detail.
  • Imagine that you are with this subpersonality in a marvellous garden full of plants and flowers. Look at the flowers, all of which are arranged in exquisite patterns. Sense their perfumes. Feel the vivifying freshness of the air. Hear the sounds of the birds.
  • Experience yourself and your subpersonality, and see how it looks now: it may have changes, or it may be just as before. In any case, give it space and time to absorb the atmosphere of the garden and be vivified by it.
  • Now you come to the centre of the garden. In it you find a rose plant with a closed bud. Both you and your subpersonality watch this bud as it opens very slowly. First the sepals start to spread out and the bud itself is revealed. Then the bud starts to unfold and swell, and you can see the petals opening until the rose has fully blossomed.
  • Both you and your subpersonality sense the fragrance emanating from the very core of this rose. Let yourselves be pervaded by it.
  • Then look at your subpersonality. How does it appear now? And what is now the relationship between the two of you?
  • You can repeat this exercise with more than one subpersonality at a time.

From the integrationist viewpoint of Malcolm Sweeting (2), working with subpersonalities has several benefits:

  1. We learn to recognise our various and contradictory faces and thus undergo a miniature psychoanalysis. In this way we forthrightly own the maternity or paternity of all our parts instead of exiling them into unconsciousness.
  2. We learn to be able to free ourselves from the control of the forces which usually dominate us, throwing us in this or that direction like a ping-pong ball.
  3. We increase our integration by allowing our subpersonalities to become synergistic rather than antagonistic with each other
  4. We can raise each subpersonality to its highest potential and thus discover that every psychological aspect has in itself the seed of its own transformation.
  5. Finally, by peeling off each mask, one by one, we move ever closer to discovering our underlying core self: our true self.

Notice the proposition of a ‘core self'’. Logically, by definition, this true self cannot be our entire self, and must therefore, in some sense or other, itself constitute a subpersonality. The term true self implies other parts are less `true', and therefore less acceptable. One of my goals as a counsellor is to help clients to understand and accept who they are, and find my pluralistic model of greater help in achieving this goal.

References

  1. Ferrucci, P., 1982, What We May Be, London: Turnstone Press.
  2. Sweeting, M., 1991, ‘Subpersonalities’, unpublished document, ‘Imagery in Counselling and Psychotherapy’ course, University of Durham.

Personality dissociation pages: Previous page 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next page

 p.g.h@btinternet.com

This document in all parts is copyright © Peter Hughes from the date of construction given above. Please feel free to make use of them for solely personal purposes. However, should you wish to use them for teaching, training, commercial or other purposes, you are required to ask me first.