Jemima: The Future

[Under development 6 February 2005]

Snail rule: 0.5K

Guessing the future does not feel straightforward for anyone. No-one knows what is round the corner. However, there is no template from which to map out the years to come. To illustrate this point, I shall pull out of the air, at random, three points. Most parents can expect:

1. to send their child to school;

2. to give their child a bicycle, and

3. to take their child away on holiday with them.

Most parents anticipate that their child will have the same kinds of expectations as they themselves did as children. Past experience has inadequately prepared us, and is only a meagre guide, for bringing up Jemima. For instance, Jemima's schooling is a highly political matter, because she is sent out of county, and financial cutbacks at any time in the next six years could mean that appropriate educational provision is withdrawn. Jemima goes to school on a daily basis. She attends Northern Counties School for the Deaf in Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Jemima will never be able to ride a bicycle. Instead, our concern is how to get her access to an appropriate wheelchair. Her motor control is insufficient to cope with an electric wheelchair (although she would like one), and so all her locomotion is dependent on the presence and help of other people. The size of a wheelchair demands a large car boot, and lifting Jemima into and out of a car seat demands the kind of access available only in an MPV: so we had to buy an MPV (Toyota Picnic). More recently, lifting her in and out of the Picnic became problematic, and we were left with little option but to buy an adapted vehicle that carries her in her wheelchair (a wheelchair adapted VW Sharan).

Going on holiday, particularly overseas, takes phenomenal planning and information gathering: checking out wheelchair access in advance for every hotel we book, every tourist attraction we wish to visit (e.g. Warwick Castle is almost completely inaccessible for wheelchairs), and many restaurants in which we intend to eat. For instance, we recently visited Venice, and I must have contacted more than two dozen hotels, and obtained the details for as many again, to locate a hotel we could afford and could accommodate a person in a wheelchair. I even made telephone calls to the US to check out details of hotel elevators, the width of bedroom doors, and how many steps were at the front entrance (not all Venetian hotels start on the ground floor!). This is the same for all wheel-chair bound people, and reveals that there is an implicitly exclusionist assumption that runs through British (and European) society. Disabled people should not have to be grateful that facilities are provided for them. Unless appropriate facilities are their right, then disabled people are, de facto, being excluded.

The latest Big Problem has been how to transport Jemima by aeroplane. Until now, she has travelled strapped into her car seat, which, in turn, is strapped into the airline passenger seat. However, she is getting too big for her car seat and requires a new, larger one. There is no way in which a larger car seat is going to fit into an airline passenger seat. I telephoned British Airways and asked their advice. I was told that either Jemima could be "tied to the airline passenger seat or else travel on a stretcher." (Were the Victorians less enlightened even than this?) I hope that someone from British Airways reads this web page one day and asks themselves: "How would I feel about this response if it were my child being considered?" It would seem that neither the airlines nor any manufacturers fear any loss of revenue by ignoring the needs of people who cannot sit unsupported.

Almost until her ninth birthday, we lived in a three bed-roomed, semi-detached house. Jemima's furniture and equipment take up a lot of room and we ran out of space. As she gained weight, albeit slowly, carrying Jemima up and down the stairs has become increasingly problematic, and there were several falls that could have been catastrophic. A through-the-floor wheelchair lift was the only way to deal with the situation, which would have required considerable modifications to the house. A downstairs toilet was also becoming essential. A walk-in shower would be of value when it becomes too difficult to lift her in and out of the bath. We drew up plans with a builder to modify the house for Jemima's needs. However, the modifications would have run to almost half the value of the house, and would not have added to the value of the property. There was no grant-funding to be had (I know because I applied). There was, therefore, little choice but to move to a bungalow. Many modifications will be necessary, such as a wheelchair ramp to the front door, a walk-in shower, and environmental controls so that Jemima does not have to be attended to constantly. However, the problems associated with living in a two-storey house with stairs have now evaporated.

Birds rule: 1K

  p.g.h@btinternet.com

Jemima: sitemap

Peter Hughes: Introduction