| Clear
water hunters
Wouldn’t
it be great if you could actually SEE your quarry taking the bait? Well
Hugh Pollard does exactly that by stalking his quarry, in the process
he’s seen some fascinating aspects of pike behaviour
Not
many pike anglers may have the opportunity of seeing their intended quarry,
and then, hopefully, inducing it to take our bait, but my experiences of
stalking pike suggest that we can gain a useful insight into pike behaviour
by watching them in clear water.
I am
fortunate to live in Hampshire, famed for it’s clear chalk streams, but
many Southern fisheries including gravel pits, rivers and canals are often
of sufficient clarity to make stalking a viable possibility.
For
many years I have had a passion for stalking fish - be it Stillwater trout
in lakes, grey mullet in harbours or pike in clear water. However my pursuit
of pike by stalking really started by accident in September 1997. I decided
I would try some deadbaiting on a local pit. On walking around the bank,
wearing a peaked cap and Polaroids, I noted that the water was gin-clear
and although the sun was fairly low in the sky, I could see the bottom
quite easily up to ten to fifteen yards from the bank- at least where it
was clear of thick ribbon weed. I saw a number of jacks on my walk and
I therefore decided to use a mobile approach with one rod, the absolute
minimum of other tackle and that I would try to catch any fish I could
see.
I
started in a favourite deadbait ‘hotspot’ – a corner swim shaded
by trees. Thick weed at about ten yards meant that I could only cast wobbled
bait to the weed edge and then watch it flutter to the bottom before starting
my retrieve. Second cast and I watched a fish, that I guessed to be about
eight pounds, follow the sprat in towards the bank, I let the bait lie
on the bottom and for what seemed an age, (probably only about five minutes),
I watched the pike circle my bait, inspecting it before slowly retreating
to the cover afforded by the weed. I wondered whether a change of bait
could induce a more favourable response and quickly changed to a fresh
dead rainbow trout. As soon as I cast this out the pike reappeared from
the wall of weed and followed my bait in. However this time only a few
seconds after the trout had settled on the gravely bottom I saw the pike
tilt down in the water and ‘suck’ it in. After seeing the gills flare
I struck hard.
This
spirited fish weighed a shade over fifteen pounds and gave me more pleasure
than many larger specimens. A valuable lesson learnt here was that it is
very easy (almost the rule) to under estimate the size of fish lying even
about six feet down in clear water. However there really is no substitute
for experience in assessing the size of fish while stalking.
Ideal
conditions
Most
of my clearwater piking since has been on a local canal but my experiences
here would apply to other types of venue. Stalking is easiest when it is
sunny, when there is little wind and when the sun is higher in the sky
(in other words in the middle of the day in the Winter). These conditions
tend not to be the best for catching fish but it is usually possible to
stalk pike to some degree even on grey and windy days because many fish
lie in the margins and these are often sheltered from the wind by backside
cover.
Essential
stealth
Like
any method of stalking stealth is essential and perhaps even more so with
pike fishing because of their keenness to lie under the cover of overhanging
trees or alongside marginal rushes. Also, if the water is slightly coloured,
as is often the case in the winter after rain, one’s vision may be limited
to just the first few yards from the bank.
Pike,
even large ones may be just under one’s feet and they may not be seen until
they break cover. It is always worth having a few casts in “hotspots” as
pike may be drawn from this cover when they were previously unseen. Some
days (usually during less favourable weather conditions) I can walk along
the canal without seeing any pike and on other days I have seen as many
as a dozen or so good fish in a half-mile stretch. The fish are clearly
there all the time but holed up under cover when not feeding. This explains,
I believe, the fact that if you can see them you stand a very good chance
of catching them because one is seeing feeding fish. On a number of occasions
I have also caught good fish by ‘fishing blind’ particularly at dusk, in
a spot where I had seen probably the same fish earlier.
In
fact I have now adapted my deadbaiting to deliberately fish where I have
seen good fish move in the past with greatly improved results. So what
do I do if I have seen a fish I would like to catch? Well, I watch to see
if the fish is on the move or not. If it is stationary, I will lower a
deadbait under a float, fished about three feet over-depth, no more than
a foot in front of the target fish. (Unfortunately there is a live bait
ban on my local canal as their use could be devastatingly effective). Some
fish will spook as soon as they see the bait, (I suppose that it must be
rather unnatural for one’s dinner to land on one’s nose), and if this happens
it is best to wait for the pike to come to rest again, and then recast
at least six feet in front of the pike. Many fish however, do take the
bait seconds after it has settled on the bottom – see enclosed photo of
a 19lb fish that did just that.
Patrol
routes
For
pike which are on the move one has to guess their patrol route and cast
well ahead of it to get one’s bait nicely settled on the bottom before
hopefully, the pike swims right to it. One memorable fish, when I cast
bait at it, would swim to the far bank of the canal, and when I cast to
it there it would appear at the near margin. This cycle happened about
four times but as the light started to fade, I cast out two baits – one
to the near bank and one to the far bank and sat back. This fish eventually
took my far-margin bait some two hours after I had first seen it – a fish
over 19lb – a personal best for me from the canal at that time.
I
have watched fish swim cautiously round and round the bait inspecting it
(or the trace?). One such 20lb-plus fish spent about twenty minutes doing
this before eventually swimming away at high speed. I feel sure that it
was hungry but it definitely detected that something was amiss with my
presentation. I think it may have also bumped into my mono. going up to
my float. As a result of this experience I now float-ledger a deadbait
with at least one swan shot eighteen to twenty-four inches above the trace
swivel to tether some line to the bottom near to the bait.
Using
this set-up, on those occasions that a fish inspects the bait for a long
time one can gently lie the rod down on the bank and step away from the
edge – to avoid spooking the pike. After all if you can see the pike it
can almost certainly see you too. One can then watch the float for an indication
of a take with the odd surreptitious look to check that the fish is still
in the vicinity.
For
some reason popped-up baits have not worked for me with this style of fishing
but I do believe that it is often worth critically- balancing the bait.
I have seen a number of fish apparently trying to inhale my bait with mouth
open and gills flaring but without my bait being taken in. Perhaps the
rest of the terminal tackle causes some extra resistance or maybe the treble
hooks end up under the bait and partially snag the canal bed- particularly
over a weedy bottom. I critically balance my baits for stalking either
with air –injecting or by placing small pieces of wine cork down the bait’s
throats. I do not believe there are any ill consequences to the pike of
using cork, as the pike never get a chance to swallow the bait as I always
strike as soon as I see the target fish close it’s mouth.
I
urge you to try stalking pike, as this visual method is always exciting
– I know as my Polaroid’s keep steaming up at the critical moment when
a good fish is about to take my bait!
This article was first
published in Pike & Predators magazine |