FROM
SMALL BEGINNINGS
from
SHIPS
& STEEL - THE STORY OF JOHN BROWN'S
by
Sir Alan Grant
JOHN BROWN was born in 1816, and
was the second surviving son of Samuel
Brown, who was a slater in Sheffield. Samuel Brown was in poor
circumstances
but possessed considerable strength of character, which was inherited
and
afterwards shown to better advantage in a larger sphere by his son.
John Brown acquired what
education he had in a local school, conducted
by a master of old and unacademic type. He kept a school in a garret,
and when
John Brown first came under his rule, his brusque manner of replying to
questions offended the dignity of the 'Master.'
It was a mixed school, another
pupil being a girl three years older than
John Brown, whose name was Mary
Schofield, and she was the
future Lady Brown. It may be said of her that she was a considerable
help to
John Brown in his subsequent career, and at all times took a very keen
interest
in the education of the young. She was very liberal, and assisted many
poor and
distressed persons, which much endeared her to the working classes of
Sheffield. She died in November 1881.
When young Brown reached the age
of 14, his
father wished
to make him a linen draper, but, to his surprise, the boy would not
agree to
such a career. When asked what he wanted to do, his ready answer was,
'I should
like to be a merchant.' His father thought that it would be impossible
for him
ever to attain such a position, but the boy was so determined on this
course
that the father consulted the old schoolmaster, and was surprised to
find that
the schoolmaster backed up the son's idea.
John Brown then entered the
service of a local firm of merchants named
Earle Horton & Co., who traded in the staple wares of Sheffield.
For the
first two years he received no wages, but during the last five years of
his
apprenticeship was paid 6/- per week. At the end of his apprenticeship
his
father gave him a new suit of clothes and a sovereign, telling him that
for the
future he must rely on his own exertions.
In 1836 his employers, who had
in the meantime
entered into the steel trade as producers, removed from Orchard Place
to
Rockingham Street, where they established the Hallamshire works, and
began to
manufacture files and cutlery. The following year, when John Brown came
of age,
he was offered a partnership, but was unable to find the necessary
capital and
had to decline the offer. Mr. Earle, the senior partner, however, on
further
consideration, offered him the factoring part of the business, and John
Brown
managed to persuade his father and a well-to-do uncle to be security
for £500,
which the local bank agreed to advance. He travelled the country
with a
horse and gig, canvassed for orders, and carried his own samples. His
industry
was rewarded, and the business rapidly increased.
Being full of self-confidence,
he now determined
to make his own steel, rather than to retail cutlery made by other
manufacturers. With the consent of his employers, he resigned and
started
entirely on his own account, his first works being small premises in
Orchard
Street. These works prospered and grew so rapidly that he disposed of
his
factoring business and moved to larger premises in Furnival Street, to
which he
gave the name of the Atlas Steel Works. In these works he, at first,
manufactured crucible steel files. The great impetus, however, which
the works
received was due to the very rapid expansion of railways in this
country at
that particular period, which created an almost unlimited demand for
such
things as railway springs, buffers and other accessories.
In 1848 he
invented and patented the conical spring buffer, which soon proved a
great
success both commercially and mechanically. He was obviously so proud
of this
invention, which he looked on as the foundation of his fortune,
that he
incorporated it in the subsequent coat of arms which he assumed when in
due
course he attained knighthood. This is still to be seen on the seal of
the
company.
The first pair of these buffers ever made went to the
Taff Vale
Railway Co., in South Wales, the second to the Glasgow and
South-Western
Railway, the third to the Dublin and Drogheda Railway, and the first
pair used
in England were supplied to the London & North-Western Railway.
A good example of his enterprise
is shown in the following incident. He
was in Edinburgh a few days before the date appointed
for the opening of the new line to Dundee. He called
on the engineer of the line on Saturday, and was told that everything
was ready
except a few sets of brake springs, and there was every prospect of the
opening
ceremony being spoiled
through the default of the contractor in not having these
springs ready. They were wanted by the following Thursday. The engineer
was in
dire straits, but John Brown said, 'You shall have them in time.' He
started
that afternoon by coach for Berwick, took the train to Newcastle and
reached
Sheffield on Sunday afternoon. The
springs were put in hand first thing on Monday morning, and were
finished that
night. He had them packed up and
started
back with them
himself. He went by
rail to Manchester and Fleetwood, from which
station
the mail started for the North. The railway officials, however, refused
to take
such a bulky package in a mail train. John Brown, however, was not to
be
thwarted; he arranged for a horse-box to be attached to the train, and
travelled with the springs himself, arriving in Glasgow on Wednesday
afternoon,
and the springs were duly delivered in time for the opening ceremony.
John Brown's existing premises
proving too small, he acquired first one
additional workshop and then another, until in 1853 his works were
being
carried on in four different districts. In 1854, however, what were
then known
as The Queen's Works in Savile Street, owned by Armitage, Frankish
&
Barker, were offered for sale; the site comprised three acres, of which
one
acre was covered by buildings. They were originally built at a cost of
£23,000
but Brown bought them for little more than half that amount. The works
covered
the site of the present Atlas offices and the south department, and
extended
only from Savile Street to the Midland Railway line. The Queen's Head
now
mounted in the entrance hall of the main offices was the keystone of
the arch
over the entrance to the old Queen's Works. This stone was taken down
and
remained in one of the cellars under the main offices until the time of
the
Munich crisis in 1938. As the possibility of war seemed imminent,
orders had been given
for these cellars to be cleared and made available for air-raid
shelters as far
as possible, and it was during this clearance that the stone was
discovered,
and the managing director gave instructions that it should be mounted
in its
present position as an interesting historical relic.
On the 1st January, 1856, the
business was transferred to the new works,
and in honour of the event John Brown, his friends and workpeople,
numbering
about 200, celebrated the occasion. The premises were decorated with
flags,
cannons were fired, the schoolchildren of the district were feasted and
the
workpeople entertained to lunch. Mrs. Brown nee Mary
Schofield,
performed a christening ceremony by dashing a bottle of wine against
the wall,
and naming the premises the 'Atlas Steel and Spring Works.'
In the course of three years the
whole of the three acres were built
upon. A year after John Brown had entered the works he determined to
try his
hand in experimenting with the manufacture of iron fit for conversion
into
steel. Hitherto, this iron had been supplied from Sweden and Russia. In
1857,
in spite of the scepticism of other manufacturers, he began the
manufacture of
iron with six puddling furnaces, one balling furnace, a mill furnace
and two
Nasmyth hammers. The iron proved perfectly satisfactory, and owing to
its lower
price Yorkshire iron had a ready sale amongst his competitors in the
steel
trade. The number of puddling furnaces was then doubled, and he was
soon
producing about 100 tons of iron per week.
The existing works now proved
too small, and he acquired more land on
the north side of the Midland Railway, known for many years as the
North
Department. The first stone of the new works was laid in June 1859. The
iron
made at the Atlas Works was then coming into use for other purposes
besides
conversion by cementation for steel making. Notably, boiler and bridge
plates
were beginning to be made of this Yorkshire wrought iron-for instance,
some of
the plates used for Charing Cross Bridge were manufactured at the Atlas
Works.
A further notable step was now
taken by his decision to produce steel by
the Bessemer process, and it may be of interest to give here a brief
account of
Sir Henry Bessemer's experiments, which led to John Brown making this
decision.
Bessemer was the youngest son of
Anthony
Bessemer, a Frenchman who had
come to this country at the time of the French Revolution, and was a
man of
inventive genius who had been employed at the Mint. Henry Bessemer was
born at
Charlton in Hertfordshire in 1813, and showed his father's qualities at
a very
early age. His talents were diverse, and he was, in fact, the inventor
of the
elongated projectile which eventually superseded the old round
cast-iron shot.
It was his search for stronger material for the projectile and for the
gun that
fired it that determined him to investigate the question of how to
produce
stronger metal. He had no previous experience of the manufacture of
iron and
steel, and had not the least idea of how he was going to set about it.
He
studied metallurgy and found that the process then in use for making
steel by
the Huntsman process had been practised for nearly a century without
any
improvement. He started his experiments in an old factory near St.
Pancras
Station, London, and converted the factory into a small experimental
iron
works. He devoted himself first to improving the quality of cast-iron,
and then
turned his attention to that of steel. Following eighteen months of
experiment
the idea struck him to render cast-iron malleable by the introduction
of blowing air into
molten metal in a crucible by means of a movable
blowpipe he could convert ten or twelve pounds of crude iron into the
softest
malleable condition. This was the genesis of the idea of the Bessemer
convertor. After much experimenting the result was satisfactory. The
new metal
was tried-its quality was good; the problem appeared to be solved.
The British
Association met at
Cheltenham
shortly after the conclusion
of his experiments and Bessemer read a paper before it
entitled 'The Manufacture of Malleable Iron and Steel without Fuel.'
This paper
created great interest, but the process was regarded with considerable
doubt by
the steel industry generally. Numerous overtures, however, were made to
Bessemer for permission to work the process in this country. The
engineers of
Ebbw Vale ironworks offered £50,000 for the patent, but this was
declined.
Henry Bessemer divided Great Britain into five iron districts, and
announced
that he wanted one iron master in each district to have so great an
interest in
the result of his invention that he would always work with him, instead
of
against him.
The proposal was accepted
by
five different iron masters, who paid £ 10,000 each, one of them being John Brown.
The Dowlais Iron Company were
the first to take out a licence, and it was arranged that Bessemer
should
advise them as to the details of working the process.
A Bessemer convertor was set up, but to the surprise' of
everybody the metal produced turned out to be completely useless, so
that the
invention which was at first received with triumph was, two months
later,
declared to be impracticable.
After many further
experiments Bessemer found that the failure was due to the presence of
phosphorus, from which Blaenavon pig, the iron used purely by chance in
his
first experiment, was exceptionally free. In consequence of this
discovery it
was decided that Swedish iron would form a more satisfactory basis
owing to its
freedom from this deleterious element.
At, that time
Sheffield
manufacturers were selling steel at £60 per ton, whereas Bessemer
could buy
Swedish iron at £7 per ton, and by blowing it for a few minutes
in the
convertor, could produce material of equal quality at a much lower
cost.
Various other difficulties arose, and it was not until manganese was
used that
Bessemer steel became really satisfactory. Bessemer found, however,
that if he
wanted to make his success assured it was necessary for him to erect
works
himself, rather than rely on licencees, whose works were not under his
control,
and he therefore bought land adjacent to the North department of John
Brown’s
works in Sheffield.
It will be realized
from what
has been said that Bessemer steel was
still regarded with a considerable amount of scepticism in various quarters. John
Brown, however, was convinced
that the Bessemer
process would be very advantageously employed on a large scale,
and he and Mr.
John Devonshire Ellis, his partner, visited
Henry
Bessemer, their next door
neighbour, and as a
result
decided, to put down a large plant for the Bessemer process. As
previously
mentioned, he was one of the five ironmasters who, immediately after
the first
announcement of the process, agreed to give a large sum for the right
to work
in his district, but when it was found that the first expectations were
not
realised he had, along
with the others, abandoned the project.
By 1859, however,
John Brown had
decided to
give up the production of steel from puddled iron and to change over
entirely
to the Bessemer process, Bessemer having proved in his own works that
steel
could be produced at £20 per ton less than the cost of
manufacture by the
puddling process. He therefore took out another licence from Henry
Bessemer,
for which he paid a Royalty of £1 per ton on steel rails and £ 2
per ton on steel for other- purposes. As soon
as the production of this cheap steel was satisfactorily
established at the
Atlas Works, John Brown perceived that it was far better than iron for
rails,
and he was the first manufacturer to make rails of Bessemer steel; this
was in
1860. Although he immediately obtained very large orders for export,
particularly from Russia, the innate conservatism of the, British
railways
hampered the introduction of steel rails in this country.
There is a legend to the effect
that John
Devonshire Ellis, 'one dark arid stormy night,' took a gang of his own
works
platelayers and surreptitiously removed one of the iron rails of the
Midland
Railway line which ran through between the North and South Departments
of the
Atlas Works, just opposite the present road to the works from the main
office
entrance. He substituted a Bessemer steel rail of the same section, and
by
daylight the job was completed. He said nothing about this to the
railway
company, but about six months later he
was asked by one of the Midland
Railway engineers to come and look at a rail which was showing no signs
of the
normal wear, whereas the iron rails on each side of it had worn down in
the
usual manner. He then confessed to the railway authorities what he had
done,
and it was this rather bold experiment which eventually led to the
introduction
of steel rails throughout the system, and subsequently to all the
other
railways.
While the new works were thus making rapid
strides, John Brown was
busily engaged in laying the foundations of another industry, which
soon became
a large consumer of iron and with which his name will be for ever
associated.
He was the pioneer of rolled armour plate making, not only in Sheffield
but in
the United Kingdom. Although the first plate was actually rolled by the
Park
Gate Iron and Steel Company of Rotherham, who obtained the first
Admiralty
contract for this work, this firm only continued their process for some
five
years, and it was John Brown and Ellis between them who
developed the armour industry. It is interesting to recall the
controversy
which appeared in the press at the time of Mr. J. D.
Ellis's death in 1906. The following
letter appeared in the Manchester Guardian, dated
November
13th, 1906, from Mr. James Johnston:–
Sir-In your memorial
notice of the late J. D. Ellis, Sheffield, you say that 'the first
armour plate
was rolled at the Atlas Works in 1859.' This is not correct. The first
armour plates
were rolled at Samuel Beale & Co's (now Park Gate Iron & Steel
Company)
Park Gate Ironworks, Rotherham, five or six years prior to the
above-named
date, for the floating battery Terror, built by Messrs. Palmer
Bros. at
Jarrow in 1853 or 1854 for use in the Crimean War, then raging. Messrs.
Palmer
in the first instance bought plates 11 in. thick and welded four of
them
together under a steam hammer to make armour plates for covering the
battleship
they were then building for our Government.
The plates made by this process
had to be planed on the surface to get
them even and uniform in thickness, rendering the process an expensive
one.
The then manager (Mr. Sanderson,
I think) of Messrs. Beale's Works
suggested to Messrs. Palmer that he could roll these plates 4 in.
thick, and so
save welding and planing the surfaces, and, the Government having
approved, the
remainder of the plates were made in that way.
When chief engineer
of the Park Gate Works, over 25 years ago, I replaced
the original armour plate mill by a larger one for producing ordinary
boiler
and ship plates, and some of the old hands working for me at that time
told me
of the Sunday visits paid by officials of the Atlas Works to Park Gate,
to make
sketches of the rolling mill, the heating furnaces, and the apparatus
for
handling the heavy plates.
Yours &c.
JAMES
JOHNSTON, C.E.
OAK BANK AVENUE,
MANCHESTER.
The first British battleship
fitted with armour plate was the Warrior,
the construction of which ship started in 1859, although the French
had
previously built the Gloire, so that we were three years
behind them. On
one of his Continental tours John Brown asked permission to go on board
the Gloire
but was refused. However, he made as minute an examination of the
exterior
of the vessel as he could, and found that the plates were 5 ft. long by
2 ft. wide by 4t in. thick, and were made by
hammering. He was convinced that he could make thicker, larger and
finer plates
by rolling, and took the step of erecting a rolling mill in which to
manufacture
a 5-ton armour plate.
In 1862 experiments were made at
Portsmouth with four plates forged in the Government dockyards and one
rolled
plate manufactured at the Atlas Steel Works, and the Brown plate
carried off
all the honours at the subsequent trials.
The same year Lord Palmerston, then Prime Minister, went
to
Sheffield on a special visit to John Brown, who was then living at
Shirlehill
House at Sharrow, and witnessed the rolling of a plate at the Atlas
Works.
By 1867 it was reported that
three-quarters of the ironclads of the
British Navy were defended by armour plates made at the
Atlas Works.
In the
development of his armour plate plant he
expended £200,000 and by 1867 the works covered an area of 2 I
acres. The
number of men employed in 1857 was 200, and in 1867, 4,000. In the
first year
of his business he turned over about £3,000, and in the last
mentioned year
nearly one million. It will be readily understood that the financing of
such a
large concern was a big strain on the resources of a single individual,
and in
1864 John Brown and his two partners, J.D. Ellis and W. Bragge, turned
the
concern into a limited liability company, with a capital of
£1,000,000. For
many years before this date Mr. Ellis had the greatest difficulty in
scraping
together enough money at the end of the week to pay the ever-increasing
wages
bill, and it was only owing to the sagacity of Mr. Barber, the manager
of the
Sheffield Banking Company, that the large concerns of this date, who
were all
over-trading, were enabled to carry on. Mr. Barber used to enquire what
orders
they had, and if he was satisfied with the stability of their customers
he used
to advance sufficient money week by week to enable the works to
continue. This
state of affairs could, obviously, not go on indefinitely, and the
passing of
the Limited Liability Company's Act provided an opportunity for the
various
large steel firms to obtain adequate financial resources.
Ships & Steel - The
Story of John Brown's by Sir Alan Grant, Michael Joseph, 1950
Return
to other Sir John Brown pages on this site
Return to site homepage