|
<
Main Page
Excavations at the Cluniac priory of Castle Acre, Norfolk, England
| |
Excavation of a group of structures
south-west of the priory church at the Cluniac Priory of Castle Acre
in Norfolk uncovered a unique grain-processing plant comprising a
garner (granary), a barn, a kilnhouse, a malthouse and a brewhouse.
The stone phase of the standing buildings was commenced during the
mid-fourteenth century and at least two periods of reconstruction
occurred before the Dissolution. |
|
|
This plant was placed
south-west of the Priory claustral buildings on a slight slope down
to the the River Nar, a small river that provided the priory with
the greater part of its water supply via the monastic drain.
The buildings were placed around three sides of a courtyard with
the open side towards the east. On the accompanying map you can
find the locations of the Priory and the surrounding archaeological
features with the grain processing complex and the monastic drain
that runs alongside it to the north marked with letters A-E. At
the start of the excavation the buildings appeared as scrub-covered
mounds with only one structure recognisable. This is marked B on
the map and survived with some its walls still standing to some
four metres high because it had been used as a cowshed up to about
a hundred years ago.
|
This was the first building to be excavated
and proved to have been a two-storey structure with the wooden upper floor
supported by six massive wooden pillars. These had long since rotted away
but the stone bases for them were still in position. Outside the southern
wall were the footings for a flight of wooden steps that led up to the
entrance to the upper floor. External buttresses built with some architectural
pretension shows that it was no mean building. Windows in the northern
and southern walls provided a free flow of air that kept the ground floor
well ventilated while the northern-eastern corner of the building was
built on a massive flint platform alongside the monastic drain. This was
puzzling since there was no obvious need to build on the edge of the drain,
the site could have been placed several metres further south.
An analogy for this building at Bradford-on-Avon, Wiltshire, England is
much smaller but it still stands complete and dates from much the same
time. It too is a monastic building and has a pillared upper floor, in
this case stone pillars, and originally did not have a fully walled ground
floor thus allowing a free flow of air beneath the upper floor. It was
a garner (granary) as was the building at Castle Acre.
To the west of the garner at Castle Acre Priory was a structure some fifty
metres long that had been remodelled on two occasions so its latest phase
was narrower than the first. It is marked C on the plan. The main consideration
of the builders in each of the phases was to maintain a junction with
the building to the south, marked D. In the final phase a little corridor
was placed between the two.
C had a plaster floor in each of its phases, one of only two such floors
in the plant to be so favoured. All the other floors were earth. On its
latest floor lay the northern gable of building D on top of tiles from
the roof. It was surprisingly undamaged by its fall: all the elements
of its construction lay in their relevant positions despite having crashed
through the southern wall of C. After some days' thought, it became plain
that this could only have happened if C had no upper wall to speak of
and this proved to be the case for building C was half-timbered, its stone
wall standing originally, as it still does in some places, to the full
height of some 1.2 metres and above that was a timber-framed and wattle-and-daub
construction which was no real obstacle to the gable fall.
D housed a grain-drying kiln, its brick base still in position. It is
clear that the grain, still in sheaves, having first been carried into
Building C, was threshed there on the smooth plaster floor and then passed
through the junction between C and D to be dried, sacked up in the lower
part of D and then carried across the courtyard up the steps to be stored
in the upper floor of the garner.
The building to the south was a combined malthouse and brewery. At the
western end and alongide the southern wall were the bases of two malting
kilns, neither shown on the plan, which were used for drying the malt
which was steeped and dried to the correct condition on the upper floor
of the brewery. This floor has not survived but is assumed to have been
the other smooth plaster floor. After malting the malt was placed in the
mash tun and steeped in hot water. We still use the term 'mashing' in
some parts of England to describe the process when tea is allowed to stand
in the pot after the boiling water has been poured onto the tea leaves.
After mashing the liquid was placed in a copper and boiled with flavourings
which after the fifteenth century were hops and before were various hedgerow
plants like 'alewort'.
After boiling the beer was rapidly cooled in vats which have not survived
and then casked up in barrels made probably in the small annexe beside
the brewery to the south. This would have been the cooperage.
Only the bases of the mash-tun and the three coppers have survived. The
vessels themselves, being made of lead, would have been speedily salvaged
after brewing ceased along with the pipes and pumps used to move the liquid
around the brewery.
To the north of the garner was the priory drain which carried a stream
of water from the river, through the priory enclosure, and back into the
river further west, a journey of nearly a mile. Excavation of this drain
discovered a sluice gate north of Building C and a basin to the north
of Building B. The drain had been deepened and canalised and the reason
why Building B had been built on the edge of the drain was to allow sacks
of grain and barrels of beer to be slung out of a doorway overlooking
the drain down into boats moored below. These boats passed through the
sluice gate when there was sufficient head (flash, the local term) of
water, down to the River Nar and thence to King's Lynn, a major North
Sea port at the time. From there it is possible that the beer, at least,
crossed the North Sea.
Commercial activities were common in monasteries. St Gall, in Switzerland,
had three breweries, only one of which brewed for home consumption, while
elsewhere in Europe, there is evidence at St Trond and Corbie.(1) In England,
Westminster, a great Benedictine house, was a brewing monastery, while
Welsh Cistercian abbeys were engaged in beer production. Strata Florida
and Llantamarn sold theirs retail in local pubs! Other Cistercian monasteries
involved themselves in wool, timber and iron production as a means of
maximising the incomes from their estates. (2)
(1) Maguelonne Toussaint-Samat: History of Food (p. 181)
(2) David H Williams: The Welsh Cistercians (1984)
|
|