Planet
Simpson Chris
Turner Ebury
Press, 471pp This review
first appeared in Third Way, Winter 2005.
For
those not familiar with the work of jumptheshark.com, it
takes its name from the sharkjumping episode of Happy Days
which experts tell us was the demise of a once reasonably
amusing TV series, and the website is devoted to pinpointing
where any given sitcom turns, starting its long
irrecoverable descent into dross. Just in case you thought
the internet was unrelentingly trivial. The authorities
there say that The Simpsons is one of the few that have
never jumped the shark, and Chris Turner agrees.
Be that as
it may, the series that, the cover tells us 'documented an
era and defined a generation' has done all the defining it's
going to do, and it's safe to look back on the Simpsons era
and take stock. Planet Simpsons is the best book that has
been written about the show, and is surely the longest that
ever will be. It's entertaining and thorough, and a helpful
attempt to weigh up the achievement and significance of The
Simpsons. The first
chapter tells the story and tries to analyse the humour.
Half of the following chapters are about the central
characters, and these are rather good. Without reducing them
to stereotypes, Turner argues that they embody the viewpoint
and values of various sections of society, giving the show
its resonance. Homer personifies 'consumer-age America', a
self-absorbed, dumbed-down, coddled civilization around
which the world revolves, but with a heart of gold. Marge
stands for traditional family values, for good and ill, of
the kind that The Simpsons was once supposed to be
demolishing. Bart is apparently the punk ethic. Most
perceptively, Turner argues that Lisa embodies the values of
the shows writers themselves &endash; the 8-year-old girl
with the cultural interests of a Harvard grad, political
passion, environmental commitment and a taste for eastern
spirituality. It's no
surprise that Turner identifies Mr Burns with corporate
America. But this then allows him, in the highpoint of the
book, to judge the Simpsons itself as a corporation as well
as a programme, a question surprisingly lacking from most
discussions. Is it a Trojan horse, subverting commercial
culture from within? Or something more profoundly hollow, a
global empire that paints itself in biting satire and
liberal images, while selling cheaply produced crap to
children? Turner's answer is that its fortunes have been
inextricable from the Fox's network from the start, giving
it unprecedented satirical freedom, without any
counter-cultural soul to sell. Later
chapters explore the show's online following, its attitude
to other countries, celebrity culture and TV, all worth a
read. The footnotes would make a decent book in themselves.
The one weakness is that Turner is so keen to link the show
to its cultural context that he takes vast detours (10 pages
on Radiohead and ironic detachment in the middle of a
chapter on Lisa). But then products of the Simpsons
generation should have no problem hitting the virtual
picture search. just
in case you thought the internet was unrelentingly
trivial
![]()
![]()
![]()
