|
|
Skingley Skingly Skingsley Skingsly Skinsley
Skinsly Genealogy
|
21 August 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr G.M.W.Mann. Baytrees Burnhams Rd, Lt.Bookham Surrey, U.K. KT23 3AU |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 Matthew SKINSLEY c1750-1797?
|
|
|
|
|
m Jane BROWN 1770
|
|
|
|
Matthew was not baptised at Paglesham but probably moved to that village with his father William and brother Henry sometime before 1770. In this year he married Jane BROWN at Paglesham. The parish registers do not give any occupations,
but he was probably an agricultural labourer, though an occupation connected
with the sea is also possible at Paglesham. Matthew and Jane baptised at least eight children at Paglesham before Jane died in 1826. A Matthew SKINSLY was buried in 1797 at Paglesham but this could have been their son born in 1776. |
C=Christened
|
age DATE MS JB |
EVENT |
|
1749 30Jul1770 21 21 31Mar1771 22 22 Jan1774 25 25 29Sep1776 27 27 8Nov1778 29 29 17Nov1778 29 29 31Mar1782 33 33 11Apr1784 35 35 26Nov1786 37 37 May1792 43 43 4Apr1797 48 48 7Oct1799 50 1Jun1814 65 8Jan1826 77 |
Matthew born? Matthew m Jane BROWN at
Pagleshan; brother Henry a witness son William C at
Paglesham son Harry C at Paglesham son Matthew C at
Paglesham dau Jane C at Paglesham dau Jane buried at
Paglesham dau Mary C at Paglesham dau Sarah C at Paglesham dau Ann C at Paglesham son Samuel C at
Paglesham Matthew SKINSLEY buried
at Paglesham (possibly refers to son Matthew) da Mary m Philip WEST at
Paglesham; sister Sarah witness son Samuel SKINGLEY
buried at Paglesham age 23 Jane SKINSLEY buried at
Paglesham |
b=born m=married d=died
C=Christened B=Buried
Matthew was m at Paglesham in 1779; he was a bachelor and his wife a spinster born c1749. Matthew therefore was probably also born around 1750, but there is no suitable C at Paglesham, where Matthew's marriage in 1770 is the first SKINSLY entry in the register.
In 1771 Henry SKINGSLY also married at Paglesham, and in 1774, a widower William SKINSLEY married a widow Elizabeth DAY. There are then no further SKINGLY marriages for 20 years when the next generation marry. A probable explanation is that the widower William was the father of both Matthew and Henry and they all moved into the parish some time before 1770. Note that Matthew named his first son as William
There is at present no clue to their origin and no baptisms of Matthew and Henry to William around 1750 have been found, [a Matthew SKINGLEY of Roxwell m Anne CLEMENS at Good Easter 31Jan1732]
William SKINSLY 5 was baptised in Paglesham in 1771 son of Matthew & Jane. The baptism is preceded by the following marriage in the Paglesham register:
m 30Jul1770 Matthew x SKINGLEY bch otp & Jane x BROWN spr otp by banns;
wit: John ROGERS, Henry x SKINGLY
C 31Mar1771 Wm s Matthew & Jane SKINGLEY
C ??Jan1774 Harry s Matthew & Jane SKINGSLY
C 29Sep1776 Matthew s Matthew & Jane SKINSLY
C 8Nov1778 Jane d Matthew & Jane SKINSLY B 17Nov1778 Jane SKINSLY
C 31Mar1782 Mary d Matthew & Jane SKINSLY
m 7Oct1799 Philip WEST & Mary x SKINGLY spr otp; w:Sarah x SKINGLY
C 11Apr1784 Sarah d Matthew & Jane SKINSLY
C 26Nov1786 Ann d Matthew & Jane SKINSLY
C ?May1792 Samuel s Matthew & Jane SKINSLY
B 1Jun1814 Samuel SKINGLEY of Paglesham age 23 [B 1791]
B 4Apr1797 Matthew SKINSLEY
this probably refers to Matthew-6 (note that Mary’s sister Sarah witnessed the m of Mary on 1799 rather than Mary’s father Matthew), but could refer to son Matthew born in 1776
B 8Jan1826 Jane SKINSLEY of Paglesham age 77 [B 1749]
this is a suitable age for Jane and there is no other suitable candidate for this burial