| AP1 |
Heather to arrange appointment of accountants. |
Nobody will agree to do this. Heather
suggested she does the accounts and we have an independent accountant audit them. This is
fine for a company of this size. Discharged. |
| AP2 |
Tony to re-arrange CPM/Mike May meeting. |
Done. Meeting held. Actions below |
| AP3 |
Tony and Stephen to write to Fairclough Homes
and CPM reminding them of our requirements |
Done |
| AP4 |
All committee members to advise on the fees
they each paid to CPM in 1999. |
Most could not find, but Sophia advised she
paid pro-rate for year, at 54p per day |
| AP5 |
Tony and Stephen to write to MP, Fairclough,
and local Councillors re play area. |
Not done. To be carried forward. |
| AP6 |
Sophia to contact Councillors Botten &
Turner |
Done. Coun. Botten gave same responses as
previously given to Tony basically he understands our plight but can do nothing for
us. |
| AP7 |
Stephen to contact Mike May to obtain plan of
the proposed play equipment and tree plan |
Done not yet received |
| AP8 |
Stephen to contact Godstone Farm as possible
recipient of play equipment. |
Done. Not interested. |
| AP9 |
Stephen to propose plan for gate, and costing. |
Stephen showed proposed plan for gate. All
committee agreed this was good, and of interest. Costing to be firmed up, but approx
£1700 |
| AP10 |
Stephen to arrange signage for speed limit. |
Ordered. Cost approx £100 for 2 signs |
| AP11 |
Heather to pull together full list of names,
phone numbers and e-mail addresses for Close. |
Not done. Carried forward. |
| AP12 |
All committee members to liaise with their
"group" for the barbecue arrangements. |
Done. Great success. |
CPM/Fairclough Homes Meeting (summary of actions detailed by Stephen Messenger (SM))
(Full meeting notes available from Tony Newton)
Drainage: SM requested the as built drawings for both the foul and surface water
drainage systems. Mike May (MM) agreed to supply.
Manhole Keys: SM requested that Fairclough supply two sets of manhole keys. MM
agreed (at later committee meeting it was agreed Tony Newton (6) and Sophia Sinnos (11)
would hold.)
Drain cleaning: MM agreed that Fairclough would arrange jet washing of the
surface water system and cleaning out of back inlet gulleys.
Pumping Station: MM agreed to supply copies of warranties for pump. Also to
provide name of supplier, and drawing and pump spec. Also to provide suggested contact for
24 hour repair contractor. MM said the pump cost only £5000, but will confirm details. SM
sceptical that such a pump is good enough for the workload.
Landscaping: Committee complained of poor condition of landscaping and common
land, and that many shrubs, and most trees, had died. Also complained about stones and
metal in the ground. MM agreed it was unacceptable, and would arrange contractors to
return and repair/remove. Also agreed grass areas were poor, and the verges also need
repair. MM to arrange with Walton Landscapes to return and repair, including stone removal
and reseeding.
Trees/Shrubs: MM agreed to provide copies of landscaping plans for the
development, to allow residents to produce a marked up plan of what has died. Walton
Landscapes to then make good/replace.
Standpipe: MM agreed that a standpipe should have been installed, and agreed to
do this at Faircloughs expense. Brockwood residents committee (BRC) would then pay
via management fees.
Street lighting: CPM/MM agreed to ensure all bulbs are same colour, and run to
same timings.
Site gates: MM said Fairclough will not supply gates, but that Brockwood
residents could buy and install their own.
Play equipment: MM advised the play equipment is still a condition of the
Section 106 legal agreement for the site. They will have to be installed. MM agreed to
hold off on this until December, but was adamant they will not pursue an amendment to the
planning. BRC will have to make their own application, and MM agreed to supply a copy of
the planning consent, and relevant Section 106 Clause to facilitate this application.
Brockwood Residents Association Company Structure: MM agreed to have Fairclough
lawyers draw up resignations of the two Fairclough Directors, and transfer to residents.
MM suggested, and BRC agreed, this should take place after all outstanding issues
corrected and agreed by both parties.
CPM role: CPM confirmed that they were managing agents and as such placed the
sub contract packages for all maintenance issues. Until the Management Company is passed
to the residents they take their instructions from Faircloughs. David Hockley denied he
had seen any letters of complaint from SM. SM agreed to re-copy.
CPM "performance": BRC said CPMs landscaping contractor was
doing a poor job, and rarely visited only 3 noted occasions. Each time only part of
the grass areas attended to. DH said 3 visits was obviously sufficient to keep the grass
in check. BRC said this may be true, but only as the grass is so poor! DH to check
frequency of visits with contractor.
Hard Landscaping: SM said several kerb stones and many block pavers had settled
badly. MM said workers would return to repair all these areas. SM suggested MM provide a
plan so BRC could mark offending areas.
Play area.
We again discussed the play area, and agreed the only course of action seems to be to
go along with Mike Mays suggestion (above) to seek an amendment to the Section 106
agreement ourselves. Tony and Steve to arrange this when details arrive from Mike May. (AP2.1)
This action will cost £190, and also would probably entail amendments to
residents legal documentation. Action to all committee to ask for £10 from each
residence to pay for this application. Balance towards speed signage. (AP2.2)
Gate
Stephen showed an example plan of a gate he had dawn up. Committee agreed this
looked viable. Approx. cost would be £1700 so would clearly need a full vote from
residents, and, as we have no reserves, separate funding. Diagram to be circulated with
minutes, and discussed with residents. (AP2.3)
Strategy for removing CPM
- Fairclough must resign. In hand.
- Stephen tabled an alternative price structure. To be debated more fully next meeting.
- Suggested buying a lawnmower, and residents cutting grass ourselves. Needs to be on a
rota basis, but from volunteers. Stephen to investigate prices of large mower with
mulching facility. (AP2.4)
- Stephen agreed to store the mower in his garage.
- Bonfire Night
Conversation at the summer barbecue suggested residents would like to have a Bonfire
night event on the Close. Committee discussed and agreed: To be held on Sunday 5th
November, 5.00pm or 6.00pm
- No bonfire just fireworks. Ian Frazer can apparently supply fireworks. Tony to
discuss (AP2.5)
- Food: To be simple, and centrally supplied, rather than all residents chip in. Residents
to pay.
- Soup: Mary Newton; Jacket potatoes: Sophia Sinnos; Burgers: Stephen Messenger
- Drinks: Residents to bring bottles
- Sophia agreed to use her garage for food if weather is inclement.
- Costs to be advised when residents have expressed interest. (AP2.6)
- Reminder of committee/household "ownership"
Other issues.
Simon agreed to look into setting up a web site for the Brockwood residents
association (AP2.7).
Date of next meeting:
17 October 2000, 8.00pm 11 Foxon Close.
Key Action points for residents to discuss with their committee member (see 8)
above)
AP2.2 All residents to pay £10 per household to fund Section 106 planning application
AP2.7 All residents to advise if they wish to attend bonfire evening event, and how
many attending.
AP2.3 All residents to examine gate plans, and advise of their opinion.
All by Saturday 14 October 2000
Tony Newton
Chairman, Brockwood Residents Association
10 October 2000