Subscribe to planetgrrl updates

  

   the sites: life | babe | dear planetgrrl | grrls in rock | net junkies | big brother 

Home
Film
Books
Education
Finances
Grrls Articles
EcoGrrl

  Email PlanetGrrl Life

Back to PlanetGrrl Central for more sites ...

[ PLANETGRRL.COM ]

Copyright © 1998-2004 PlanetGrrl. All rights reserved. Revised: 08/02/00

 

 

 

Small Time Crooks

[ Back To Grrls Articles ]

Small Time Crooks

reviewed by Katie

Woody Allen’s latest film might be one to which you can take that friend of yours who has always hated his “Oh my God, I mean, how did I end up sleeping with a beautiful young woman whilst writing a great new novel” style of plot creation.

Synopsis: Bunch of unaccomplished criminals headed up by Ray Winkler (Allen) embark on plan to rob local bank, only to end up cookie millionaires thanks to the cooking of Tracey Ullman. (Frenchy Winkler - Tracy doesn’t play herself – although it might have been more amusing if she had!) Having made their millions they enter polite society and Frenchy’s love of “art” and determination to be accepted by high society as a patron of the art begins to drive a wedge between her and Ray. Soon she is buying ridiculously priced art, traveling around Europe and eating in the best society accompanied by Hugh Grant and the masked laughter of the socialites she’s trying to impress.

It’s nice to see the world in which Allen loves to set his plots being criticised for once. And, difficult as it is for us Brits to see Tracy Ullman as a superstar, she is perfect in the role as Allen’s naïve yet sassy wife. She delivers excellent one liners and there is some classic slapstick at points, in fact I laughed out loud. Properly. Not just a chortle believe you me!

So why is it that I wasn’t that impressed by the film as whole? Could it have the hackneyed, boring and frankly racist characterisation of the uber-baddy (as far as this film can have one) as an upper class Englishman in the form of Hugh Grant and complete with accent? Could it have been that I felt that the film’s themes had all be explored before? Could it have been that it all felt a little too obvious how the plot would unfold? I don’t know I’m afraid.

It’s not that I wouldn’t advise you to go and see it. Do go and see it. Enjoy it. But don’t blame me if you feel at the end that it was missing an indefinable completeness that was almost, nearly, just about within its grasp.

Katie

 

                                                                           Copyright © 1998-2004 PlanetGrrl.
                                                                         All rights reserved. Revised: 08/01/04